99L Invest E of Windwards,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #2

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#321 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:00 pm

This wave looks DOA for the Carib. as far as any TC development is concerned, next.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#322 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:02 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:This wave looks DOA for the Carib. as far as any TC development is concerned, next.
ok, well as long as the NHC says this could become a TD, I don't think it should be written off.
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#323 Postby Frank2 » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:04 pm

Derek, I have to stay with my original gut feeling that this is (was) nothing more than an ITCZ disturbance - even the below loop shows the remnant circulation center on the tail of the area of convection soon to be crossing into South America:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/catl/loop-avn.html

I didn't say it because I know as much (my just being an admin/met tech person back in those days), but, it (the ITCZ disturbance factor) was something that I was frequently told by some at the old NHEML/NHC who are now either retired or have passed on (John Hope, Stan Wright, Dr. Rosenthal, etc.)...

One time in the Summer of '81, we were all excited about an area of disturbed weather northeast of Puerto Rico, and, we even worked all night, waiting for the system to develop, but, Dr. Rosenthal came into the office the next morning, at his usual time (since he was more sensible than we), took one look at a visible photograph, and said, "Go home, Frank!"

Needless to say, he was right - the system did not develop...

May they all rest in peace...

Frank
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#324 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:09 pm

Frank2 wrote:Derek, I have to stay with my original gut feeling that this is (was) nothing more than an ITCZ disturbance - even the below loop shows the remnant circulation center on the tail of the area of convection soon to be crossing into South America:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/catl/loop-avn.html

I didn't say it because I know as much (my just being an admin/met tech person back in those days), but, it (the ITCZ disturbance factor) was something that I was frequently told by some at the old NHEML/NHC who are now either retired or have passed on (John Hope, Stan Wright, Dr. Rosenthal, etc.)...

One time in the Summer of '81, we were all excited about an area of disturbed weather northeast of Puerto Rico, and, we even worked all night, waiting for the system to develop, but, Dr. Rosenthal came into the office the next morning, at his usual time (since he was more sensible than we), took one look at a visible photograph, and said, "Go home, Frank!"

Needless to say, he was right - the system did not develop...

May they all rest in peace...

Frank


that is not the remant circulation ... it is about 46w 9.5 N
I do however agree that it is caught in the ITCZ but from the looks of it .. it maybe trending away we will have to watch it
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#325 Postby Frank2 » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:18 pm

Yes, that's the one I was referring to - it's on the tail end of ITCZ convection...

Frank
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#326 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:18 pm

ok well i think we are seeing the beginnings of the center closing off.. well at least that is the though t right now.. that boundry i have been talking about is bending north and looks to be breaking a bit.. and again the trend continues .. we will be seeing a developming system as is moves away from the ITCZ

one more the the center that i pointed out appears to getting better organized and there is increases convection right on the NW side of it and i also see lots of clouds and moisture being pulled in the the SW and S side now where before it was not happening http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-rgb.html

center 9.5 N 46.2 west
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#327 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:20 pm

http://image.weather.com/images/maps/tr ... 20x486.jpg

SSTs are warm enough for development, all we need is for the SAL to stop harrasing this poor wave.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#328 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:21 pm

Frank2 wrote:Yes, that's the one I was referring to - it's on the tail end of ITCZ convection...

Frank


yes ok but one key point it is a little further north .. of the boundry or ITCZ to its WSW the boundry to its north or the rest of the wave axis is coming around to a more typical postion for a system that is developing..

but the trend must continue .. we need to watch for that boundry to or the system to move away from the ITCZ..
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#329 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:24 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:ok well i think we are seeing the beginnings of the center closing off.. well at least that is the though t right now.. that boundry i have been talking about is bending north and looks to be breaking a bit.. and again the trend continues .. we will be seeing a developming system as is moves away from the ITCZ

one more the the center that i pointed out appears to getting better organized and there is increases convection right on the NW side of it and i also see lots of clouds and moisture being pulled in the the SW and S side now where before it was not happening http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-rgb.html

center 9.5 N 46.2 west
I see that too. I think this is trying to get it's act together.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#330 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:26 pm

Looking better:

Image
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#331 Postby Frank2 » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:27 pm

I really don't believe it'll develop, but, we'll see...
0 likes   

trendal
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:43 pm

#332 Postby trendal » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:29 pm

Pressure still dropping on buoy 41041...down to 1012.9mb
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#333 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:32 pm

The NHC have this at 1011mb according to a 2PM. Looks like 99L is trying to get better organized. I still need some more proof that this is organizing.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#334 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:34 pm

ok everyone its going ... i believe that we are seeing the process right now... the center is closed off... i am seeing banding inwards on the westside of that boundry i have talking about i also see banding coming in from the SW which was not there just 4 hours ago... i also see small popcorm showers NW of that boundry which was not there before do to that boundry .. the signs are there .. we need to keep a eye on it as well as the convection right near the center that is now tight... has continued to increase
0 likes   

kenl01
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:35 am

#335 Postby kenl01 » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:35 pm

This system reminds me of Fran of 1990, which remained far to the south. It eventually dissipated after its remnants moved into Venezuela after entraining dry air from the south into the circulation. Plus there was also some shear in progress as it moved into the Southern Caribbean.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#336 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:40 pm

Looking better?

What am I missing. All I see is a relatively weak tropical wave that is unable to produce convection near the wave axis
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#337 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:42 pm

Derek, I'm just wondering. Are you always negative about waves no matter how good they look?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#338 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:45 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:Derek, I'm just wondering. Are you always negative about waves no matter how good they look?
yeah, I noticed that too. Derek, why do you give nothing a chance?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#339 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:46 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Looking better?

What am I missing. All I see is a relatively weak tropical wave that is unable to produce convection near the wave axis


that may be changing.....
i can see a defined center at 46.2 w 9.5N .. which has not been present at all.... the boundry/ ITCZ that has been sitting on its west side is lifting north and there is more convection beginnig to fire right around the center.... as well on the other side of the boundry i can see inflow on the west and Sw side which again as not been present .. since its location with the ITCZ.. but the overall circulation looks better..
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#340 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:48 pm

Its probably because none of the invests out here have made it...but this ones different. Were closer to August now, shear is low, convection is makeing a comeback and the low is beginning to close off...I think this ones gonna make it
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 33 guests