Tropical Storm Chris

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
jabber
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 5:36 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC (former Boynton Beach, Fl)

#2841 Postby jabber » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:38 pm

Ok if this track contiunes... the GFDL rules. Who would have thought...
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9485
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#2842 Postby ROCK » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:39 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:so he is not really moving south?



Man, its like a bad roller coaster or soap opera, isnt it....... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#2843 Postby jasons2k » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:39 pm

Couldn't resist - I just keep staring at the radar loops. If I'm interpreting this correctly, the feeder bands to the NW of the convection are feeding into the LLC - which would be located on the NW side of the blob and the mid-upper level rotation. The 'blob' of convection keeps dropping to the SW towards PR but the LLC isn't moving south much at all. I wonder if when we see the first visibles if we will have an exposed center.
Last edited by jasons2k on Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Rieyeuxs
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

#2844 Postby Rieyeuxs » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:40 pm

From the NHC 11pm discussion:

CHRIS HAS BEEN PERSISTENTLY PRODUCING VERY DEEP CONVECTION NEAR THE
CIRCULATION CENTER THIS EVENING...WITH CLOUD TOPS AS COLD AS -80C.
WSR-88D RADAR IMAGERY FROM SAN JUAN DURING THE PAST FEW HOURS HAS
DEPICTED A CIRCULATION NEAR 25000 FT IN ALTITUDE. THE LAST FIX FROM
THE AIR FORCE RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT AT AROUND 00Z LOCATED THE
LOW-LEVEL CENTER A LITTLE WEST OF THAT FEATURE...WITH A CENTRAL
PRESSURE OF ABOUT 1007 MB. THE ADVISORY INTENSITY REMAINS 50 KT.

Questions. When they are talking about the deep convection near the circulation center, are they talking about the MLC at 25000 ft? I guess my question is that they're talking about a circulation center with cold clouds (good for development) but then they're talking about the LLC west of that. Wouldn't that already indicated the decoupling? I was wondering since Derek was talking about an exposed LLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#2845 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:40 pm

jabber wrote:Ok if this track contiunes... the GFDL rules. Who would have thought...
well one thing to keep in mind is that this storm has been north of the GFDL for the last few days, thus it hasn't really been following the model perfectly.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#2846 Postby Stratosphere747 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:43 pm

I'm a bit excited to see something like this occur, if in fact this is what is happening. Only enhances the learning process.

Sometimes you have to quite worrying about where the storm is going to be in 7 days, and look at what it's doing during the present moment....;)
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#2847 Postby f5 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:44 pm

my name is Chris i'm not weakening at all at my computer
Last edited by f5 on Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6114
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#2848 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:45 pm

me neither
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#2849 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:48 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:The WV loop shows the situation perfectly:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-wv.html

Looks like the system to the NE of Chris is shoving southward. Seems like a complex situation may be setting up though. After it moves southward it could be drawn back NW on the backside of this system. Confusing. I see no signs of decoupling on this loop though (no LLC moving out of the convection mass).


How are you going to see a LLC on a WV loop?
I don't know. Figured it might be like Alberto where you could pick out the swirl.


You will never see a LLC on water vapor (unless it is an eye). You must look at visible or nighttime ir (channel 2).
0 likes   

User avatar
MississippiHurricane
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 648
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:20 am
Location: Hanover, Maryland
Contact:

#2850 Postby MississippiHurricane » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:50 pm

Well, MY name is Chris and im weakening (or so you think) muhahahahaha
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#2851 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:50 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:The WV loop shows the situation perfectly:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-wv.html

Looks like the system to the NE of Chris is shoving southward. Seems like a complex situation may be setting up though. After it moves southward it could be drawn back NW on the backside of this system. Confusing. I see no signs of decoupling on this loop though (no LLC moving out of the convection mass).


How are you going to see a LLC on a WV loop?
I don't know. Figured it might be like Alberto where you could pick out the swirl.


You will never see a LLC on water vapor (unless it is an eye). You must look at visible or nighttime ir (channel 2).
your right AFM. You can see the LLC much clearer on shortwave IR. It looks like it IS moving away from the MLC like you said. Things should get interesting now.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-ir2.html
0 likes   

User avatar
MississippiHurricane
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 648
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:20 am
Location: Hanover, Maryland
Contact:

#2852 Postby MississippiHurricane » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:51 pm

Geez how many ppl are named Chris on here?
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#2853 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:55 pm

i am...anyway, i think we are about to see a neked LLC going around 280 degrees and a MLC going around 200 degrees.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#2854 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:56 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:your right AFM. You can see the LLC much clearer on shortwave IR. It looks like it IS moving away from the MLC like you said. Things should get interesting now.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-ir2.html


We could very well have a naked swirl by morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#2855 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:57 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:your right AFM. You can see the LLC much clearer on shortwave IR. It looks like it IS moving away from the MLC like you said. Things should get interesting now.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-ir2.html


We could very well have a naked swirl by morning.
Do you think this could come back like Alberto did once it reaches a more favorable environment to it's west?
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

Who name is Chris

#2856 Postby f5 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:58 pm

me and my eyes are weakening for the night
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#2857 Postby JonathanBelles » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:58 pm

ive ben gone since 11 why will we have a naked swirl?
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#2858 Postby Stratosphere747 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:58 pm

Looks like it is already becoming exposed AFM...
0 likes   

jhamps10

#2859 Postby jhamps10 » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:58 pm

it may.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#2860 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:59 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:your right AFM. You can see the LLC much clearer on shortwave IR. It looks like it IS moving away from the MLC like you said. Things should get interesting now.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-ir2.html


We could very well have a naked swirl by morning.
Do you think this could come back like Alberto did once it reaches a more favorable environment to it's west?


yeah...better gain some lattitude though
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests