Forecasting Chris - Most Difficult Storm in a Long Time
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23693
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Forecasting Chris - Most Difficult Storm in a Long Time
This thread is not meant to bash the NHC. I think they do a terrific job at what they do but this is the first time in a long time they COMPLETELY were wrong on their forecast for Chris.
I think Chris shows that although we have made great progress over the years in tropical forecasting, we are still a LONG way from really understanding these systems and it is what makes the tropics so suspenseful and entertaining.
Comments?
I think Chris shows that although we have made great progress over the years in tropical forecasting, we are still a LONG way from really understanding these systems and it is what makes the tropics so suspenseful and entertaining.
Comments?
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:59 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes
Well, if they made a mistake it was not in sticking with their first TCD:
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2006/di ... .001.shtml?
I know everyone loves the computer models, but, sometimes you just have to go with your first impression...
Frank
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2006/di ... .001.shtml?
I know everyone loves the computer models, but, sometimes you just have to go with your first impression...
Frank
Last edited by Frank2 on Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
are you kidding? That would have been an even bigger mistake. Are you forgetting that Chris was once a 65mph TS?Frank2 wrote:Well, if they made a mistake it was not in sticking with their first TCD:
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2006/di ... .001.shtml?
I know everyone loves the computer models, but, you just have to go with your first impression...
Frank
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23693
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Frank2 wrote:Well, if they made a mistake it was not in sticking with their first TCD:
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2006/di ... .001.shtml?
I know everyone loves the computer models, but, you just have to go with your first impression...
Frank
Indeed Frank it was short-lived, the models nailed it here.
THE CENTER OF THE DEPRESSION IS LOCATED NEAR THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE
CONVECTIVE MASS...DUE TO WESTERLY SHEAR RESULTING PRIMARILY FROM
STRONG EASTERLIES IN THE LOWER TROPOSPHERE. THE UPPER ENVIRONMENT
AHEAD OF THE DEPRESSION IS COMPLICATED...AND THE EVOLUTION OF A
LARGE UPPER-LOW JUST EAST OF THE BAHAMAS WILL BE IMPORTANT TO THE
FUTURE OF THE DEPRESSION. SOME GUIDANCE...PARTICULARLY THE
UKMET...SUGGESTS THAT THIS UPPER LOW WILL KEEP A STRONG WESTERLY
SHEARING FLOW IN PLACE IN THE PATH OF THE DEPRESSION. OTHER GLOBAL
MODELS RELAX THIS FLOW...BUT IT MAY NOT MATTER MUCH...AS THE SYSTEM
CONTINUES TO DEAL WITH A VERY DRY AIR MASS. THE GFDL MODEL
DISSIPATES THE SYSTEM...AS DO ALL OF THE GLOBAL MODELS. THE SHIPS
MODEL SHOWS A VERY SLOW DEVELOPMENT TREND...BUT PERHAPS THIS MODEL
CANNOT APPRECIATE JUST HOW FRAGILE A SYSTEM THE DEPRESSION IS RIGHT
NOW. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST FOLLOWS THE GLOBAL MODEL GUIDANCE THAT
SUGGESTS THIS CYCLONE MAY BE SHORT LIVED.
0 likes
- Aquawind
- Category 5
- Posts: 6714
- Age: 62
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
- Location: Salisbury, NC
- Contact:
This isn't the first time mistakes were made. They are made for every storm just to what degreee. .. When it get's right down to forecasting is a descision from interpretation like everyone else. I am sure they would agree it wa a low confidence situation due to the conflicting models and enviroment. Most people were completely wrong about Chris like 2005 and what the temp is going to be at their house in 4 hours..
Amazes me how people think this is so damn easy.. Many think they understand how to read the sattelites and data..most have no clue and this was shown during Chris as well..
Amazes me how people think this is so damn easy.. Many think they understand how to read the sattelites and data..most have no clue and this was shown during Chris as well..
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23693
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Aquawind wrote:This isn't the first time mistakes were made. They are made for every storm just to what degreee. .. When it get's right down to forecasting it's descision from interpretation like everyone else. I am sure they would agree it wa a low confidence situation due to the conflicting models and enviroment. Most people were completely wrong about Chris like 2005 and what the temp is going to be at their house in 4 hours..
Amazes me how people think this is so damn easy.. Many think they understand how to read the sattelites and data..most have no clue and this was shown during Chris as well..
I agree Paul some good points as we move on here in the 2006 season....
0 likes
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, but forecasting 30kt, 30kt, 30kt for the storms whole life would have been a huge mistake considering it was up to 55 knots yesterday.Frank2 wrote:No, I'm not - read Paragraph 2 all the way to the end...
Frank
Past performance has no indication on future results... It could have had 180MPH winds and decrease to where it is now and it doesn't change the what its facing.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests