Invest 91L,E Caribbean,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #3

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#381 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:06 pm

dwg71 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Image
Finally the models begin to look more sensible.


What is your definition of sensible?? This an "invest" at this time, models are far from sensible, just because this run show a more west/gulf track doesnt make it more "right".
uh, yes it does. With the ridge to the north I never thought this would turn north and then become a fish as they were showing earlier. Now that they have finally realized this, they are more sensible looking, because they will probably be more accurate.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#382 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:07 pm

wxman57 wrote:Here's a neat picture of 91L. I've been in bed the past 4 hours with a very sore back muscle. Got up to take a peek and thought it looked like a TS. But the spin appears to be aloft. Just goes to show how deceiving satellite imagery can be when trying to locate an LLC.

Image


Looking interesting. 8-)
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#383 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:07 pm

SHIFOR is a purely statistical model.

Where I view guidance from is not something I would post publicly. However, it usually shows up on the model plots posted here from Johnathan Vigh
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146181
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#384 Postby cycloneye » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:08 pm

SPECIAL TROPICAL DISTURBANCE STATEMENT
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
300 PM EDT WED AUG 9 2006

REPORTS FROM AN AIR FORCE RECONNAISSANCE PLANE INDICATE THAT THE
TROPICAL WAVE NEAR THE LESSER ANTILLES DOES NOT HAVE A CLOSED
SURFACE CIRCULATION. HOWEVER...THE POTENTIAL STILL EXISTS FOR THIS
SYSTEM TO BECOME A TROPICAL DEPRESSION DURING THE NEXT DAY OR SO.
SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS WITH GUSTY WINDS TO TROPICAL STORM FORCE
ARE STILL POSSIBLE AS THE WAVE MOVES ACROSS THE LESSER ANTILLES
TODAY AND TONIGHT.


In case anyone didn't see the statement posted at the other page here it is.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#385 Postby deltadog03 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:10 pm

well, models are not very good right now because its just forming or whatever...BUT**** these model track are MUCH more plausible now because this thing is weak and its going into the carribbean atleast.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

#386 Postby miamicanes177 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:10 pm

Trugunzn wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:something to get the kids excited

SHIFOR makes this a major hurricane in 5 days


Do you have a link to the SHIFOR? That might show its track also? Thanx
I'll give you a link. It is public. SHF5 can be found here...18Z should update in the next hour. http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... nsity1.png
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#387 Postby Grease Monkey » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:13 pm

Looks like it's becoming disorganized again?
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5201
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#388 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:14 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:something to get the kids excited

SHIFOR makes this a major hurricane in 5 days



Thanx, although I wish this would be pointing out to sea as opposed to Mexico... If it's going to be heading toward land, then I'd like to see may be a fast moving tropical storm out of it(as to limit the flood damage), hurricane, then head it out to sea...
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5201
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#389 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:17 pm

Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Here's a neat picture of 91L. I've been in bed the past 4 hours with a very sore back muscle. Got up to take a peek and thought it looked like a TS. But the spin appears to be aloft. Just goes to show how deceiving satellite imagery can be when trying to locate an LLC.

Image


Looking interesting. 8-)



yea I know people are screaming at me for calling it a depression, but man that looks good, alot better than most depressions I see. That is why I say it may be upgraded to storm status and skip the depression phase once it develops a LLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#390 Postby senorpepr » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:17 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
Trugunzn wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:something to get the kids excited

SHIFOR makes this a major hurricane in 5 days


Do you have a link to the SHIFOR? That might show its track also? Thanx
I'll give you a link. It is public. SHF5 can be found here...18Z should update in the next hour. http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... nsity1.png


Technically, it's not public. You just happen to have access to it.

Just like the AFDs and NHC discussions, and JTWC advisories......
0 likes   

User avatar
TheEuropean
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1797
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Voerde, Germany
Contact:

#391 Postby TheEuropean » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:18 pm

Now NRL corrected 91L to 30 kt and 1010 mb.

I don't think it will be upgraded today, it has to slow dwon a bit at first.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#392 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:18 pm

Grease Monkey wrote:Looks like it's becoming disorganized again?
no it still looks good, but a closed LLC can not form yet due to the speed of the storm. There needs to be a 32mph west surface wind right now for this to close off. Once (and IF) that happens, this should become a TD or TS.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

#393 Postby miamicanes177 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:20 pm

senorpepr wrote:
Technically, it's not public. You just happen to have access to it.

Just like the AFDs and NHC discussions, and JTWC advisories......
Well I'm glad we have access because I'm a big fan of the weather and its fun to get this kind of information. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#394 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:22 pm

Claudette

07 / 0000 11.1 53.5 1010 25 tropical wave
07 / 0600 11.8 55.3 1010 30 "
07 / 1200 12.6 57.5 1010 30 "
07 / 1800 13.2 59.8 1010 35 "
08 / 0000 13.7 62.0 1009 35 "
08 / 0600 14.0 64.8 1009 40 "
08 / 1200 14.4 67.6 1009 40 "
08 / 1800 14.8 70.0 1006 45 tropical storm
09 / 0000 15.0 72.0 1001 50 "
09 / 0600 15.1 74.4 1003 60 "
09 / 1200 15.3 76.5 1004 55 "
09 / 1800 15.8 78.6 1002 55 "
10 / 0000 16.1 80.3 1002 55 "
10 / 0600 16.6 81.7 998 55 "
10 / 1200 17.5 82.8 988 70 hurricane
10 / 1800 18.6 84.1 1003 55 tropical storm
11 / 0000 19.7 85.5 1010 50 "
11 / 0600 20.4 86.3 1009 50 "
11 / 1200 21.1 87.2 1009 50 "
11 / 1800 21.8 88.2 1009 45 "
12 / 0000 22.6 89.2 1008 45 "
12 / 0600 23.3 90.2 1007 45 "
12 / 1200 23.9 90.7 1006 45 "
12 / 1800 24.6 90.9 1008 45 "
13 / 0000 24.9 91.5 1003 45 "
13 / 0600 24.9 91.9 1005 45 "
13 / 1200 25.1 92.1 999 50 "
13 / 1800 25.3 92.2 995 50 "
14 / 0000 25.6 92.2 991 55 "
14 / 0600 26.0 92.3 993 55 "
14 / 1200 26.7 92.6 991 55 "
14 / 1800 27.3 93.0 989 60 "
15 / 0000 27.7 93.6 988 60 "
15 / 0600 27.9 94.6 987 65 hurricane
15 / 1200 28.3 95.5 982 75 "
15 / 1800 28.6 96.9 984 70 "
16 / 0000 28.5 98.2 995 50 tropical storm
16 / 0600 28.5 99.4 999 40 "
16 / 1200 28.8 100.8 1003 35 "
16 / 1800 29.3 102.6 1007 35 "
17 / 0000 29.9 104.3 1014 30 tropical depression
17 / 0600 30.5 106.0 1016 25 remnant low
17 / 1200 30.9 107.7 1016 25 "
17 / 1800 dissipated
15 / 1530 28.3 96.2 979 80 minimum pressure
11 / 1000 20.8 86.9 1009 50 landfall at Puerto Morelos, Mexico
15/ 1530 28.3 96.2 979 80 landfall at Matagorda Island, Texas
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23019
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#395 Postby wxman57 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:23 pm

I do agree that the models now look much more "sensible". The BAM models, as I have said, did not know that the ridge north of 91L would be increasing with time, so they turned it WNW across the DR/Cuba. The dynamic models, on the other hand, had seen the ridge and forecast a much more westerly path.

Here's a model plot I just made. Note that many of the dynamic models indicate a track south of west toward the 4-5 day time frame as the ridge to the north strengthens.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#396 Postby WindRunner » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:23 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Grease Monkey wrote:Looks like it's becoming disorganized again?
no it still looks good, but a closed LLC can not form yet due to the speed of the storm. There needs to be a 32mph west surface wind right now for this to close off. Once (and IF) that happens, this should become a TD or TS.


Actually, any west wind is good enough, it's just that it is going to take more energy (strength of spin) to counteract the quick forward motion. A 32mph storm-relative west wind is what we need, which would be a 5-10mph ground-relative west wind.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#397 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:25 pm

Claudette first advisory:

REPEATING THE 5 PM EDT POSITION...15.0 N... 71.3 W. MOVEMENT
TOWARD...WEST NEAR 29 MPH. MAXIMUM SUSTAINED
WINDS... 50 MPH. MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1006 MB.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#398 Postby stormtruth » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:25 pm

I wonder if it will form and then discard all clothing like crazy Christopher :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5201
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#399 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:26 pm

wxman57 wrote:I do agree that the models now look much more "sensible". The BAM models, as I have said, did not know that the ridge north of 91L would be increasing with time, so they turned it WNW across the DR/Cuba. The dynamic models, on the other hand, had seen the ridge and forecast a much more westerly path.

Here's a model plot I just made. Note that many of the dynamic models indicate a track south of west toward the 4-5 day time frame as the ridge to the north strengthens.

Image


well, at least this emliminates a USA threat and hopefully where it hits in Mexico won't be populated in case there's flooding....

Actually, it may not even make it in the gulf based on those models, might be one of those ones that emerge back into the Pacific, this seems more likely..
Last edited by ConvergenceZone on Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

#400 Postby Normandy » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:26 pm

Moving at this speed, its impossible for it to be declared a TD. If it closed off, it would be a strong TS probably because its minimum wind would be in the 30-35 mph range on its south side.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blown Away, cycloneye, Google Adsense [Bot], ouragans and 37 guests