CMC Showing a hit on N.O.

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
caneman

#21 Postby caneman » Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:56 pm

jschlitz wrote:I think y'all really should look at some models other than the CMC and the NAM. I can't count the number of phantom systems they've both developed this year. Just some advice.


Tell me which one you would count on then. This is very possible. We'll see if we get consistency
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

Re: CMC Showing a hit on N.O.

#22 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:57 pm

caneman wrote:http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/cmctc2.cgi?time=2006081712&field=850mb+Vorticity&hour=Animation


All I have to say is:

After what happened last year, I pray to God this doesn't verify. I honestly do.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8247
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#23 Postby jasons2k » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:06 pm

tailgater wrote:
jschlitz wrote:
tailgater wrote:
jschlitz wrote:Doesn't look right to me at all. That's a strange path for a NOLA hit as well, esp. in August. CMC has been forming phantom systems all season.

I'm not sure why you think that's a strange path, but on a side note we are probably the safest ones if it should come to fruition, this for out, what are chances. 8-)


B/C it brings the system from South America almost due north to NOLA. Very unlikely in August. Maybe in late September or early October, but it would be very unusual for a system to track that vertically with the easterlies still firmly in place.

Camille for one, and it shows it moving pretty much NW it's entire track In Late Sep. and Oct almost everything is a recurve.


Camille formed near 20N. The only system I can find that formed south of 15N in the Carribean and moved north to NOLA was in Sep-October 1915.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#24 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:09 pm

jschlitz wrote:
tailgater wrote:
jschlitz wrote:
tailgater wrote:
jschlitz wrote:Doesn't look right to me at all. That's a strange path for a NOLA hit as well, esp. in August. CMC has been forming phantom systems all season.

I'm not sure why you think that's a strange path, but on a side note we are probably the safest ones if it should come to fruition, this for out, what are chances. 8-)


B/C it brings the system from South America almost due north to NOLA. Very unlikely in August. Maybe in late September or early October, but it would be very unusual for a system to track that vertically with the easterlies still firmly in place.

Camille for one, and it shows it moving pretty much NW it's entire track In Late Sep. and Oct almost everything is a recurve.


Camille formed near 20N. The only system I can find that formed south of 15N in the Carribean and moved north to NOLA was in Sep-October 1915.
The CMC doesn't really look to "develop" this into a real system until it reaches 18-21N.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#25 Postby Stratosphere747 » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:10 pm

Can't wait until the operational 2160 hr runs start next year. Will be much easier to plan out the hurricane season.....
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8247
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#26 Postby jasons2k » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:11 pm

caneman wrote:
jschlitz wrote:I think y'all really should look at some models other than the CMC and the NAM. I can't count the number of phantom systems they've both developed this year. Just some advice.


Tell me which one you would count on then. This is very possible. We'll see if we get consistency


The CMC closes the system off in 12-18 hours. Sorry, I don't think that's possible. If the GFS and NOGAPS jump on board as well, then I'll pay attention, but not a single run of the NAM and CMC.

I want to clarify something, I'm not saying something can't or won't develop. I just think the models are latching onto this too quickly, and these two models have a history of making something out of nothing, that's all.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8247
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#27 Postby jasons2k » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:19 pm

FWIW I just saw a post by WxGuy1 - a Pro Met. - in another thread that is VERY pertinent to this discussion:

"Yup. I've NEVER take ANY 384hr forecast seriously, and I'd be extremely hesitant about even taking a 48hr forecast of a currently undeveloped storm seriously. Humans have a hard enough time forecasting cyclone initiation, and models aren't any better most of the time." - WxGuy1
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

#28 Postby tailgater » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:28 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
jschlitz wrote:
tailgater wrote:
jschlitz wrote:
tailgater wrote:
jschlitz wrote:Doesn't look right to me at all. That's a strange path for a NOLA hit as well, esp. in August. CMC has been forming phantom systems all season.

I'm not sure why you think that's a strange path, but on a side note we are probably the safest ones if it should come to fruition, this for out, what are chances. 8-)


B/C it brings the system from South America almost due north to NOLA. Very unlikely in August. Maybe in late September or early October, but it would be very unusual for a system to track that vertically with the easterlies still firmly in place.

Camille for one, and it shows it moving pretty much NW it's entire track In Late Sep. and Oct almost everything is a recurve.


Camille formed near 20N. The only system I can find that formed south of 15N in the Carribean and moved north to NOLA was in Sep-October 1915.
The CMC doesn't really look to "develop" this into a real system until it reaches 18-21N.

This shows surface reflection better, and I agree jschlitz nothing to worry about and I don't think anyone is.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/tcgengifs/cmc/20 ... 2/slp0.png
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4839
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#29 Postby ronjon » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:34 pm

The NAM I agree is one of the most agressive cyclone developers amongst the pack of models. CMC comes in a close second. So I'm very skeptical. With that said, the latest 18Z GFS does show a low pressure system in the western caribbean. It appears to lose it as the system moves up into the GOM but I think there may be something here to eyeball over the next week. "Tis the season. Oh, and weren't the CMC and NAM the first models to develop Alberto. And isn't the NAM doing the best job on the low pressure off the coast of SC. Just some random thoughts. :lol:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#30 Postby Cyclenall » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:34 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:Can't wait until the operational 2160 hr runs start next year. Will be much easier to plan out the hurricane season.....

I never heard about operational models that go out 2160 hr that will be starting next year. More information on this would be great.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#31 Postby Scorpion » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:38 pm

Cyclenall wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:Can't wait until the operational 2160 hr runs start next year. Will be much easier to plan out the hurricane season.....

I never heard about operational models that go out 2160 hr that will be starting next year. More information on this would be great.


:lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

#32 Postby tailgater » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:49 pm

Scorpion wrote:
Cyclenall wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:Can't wait until the operational 2160 hr runs start next year. Will be much easier to plan out the hurricane season.....

I never heard about operational models that go out 2160 hr that will be starting next year. More information on this would be great.


:lol:

Yeah that would give us 3 mths. to evacuate.
0 likes   

duris
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:21 am
Location: New Orleans

#33 Postby duris » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:59 pm

No way! I'd have to buy a Uhaul truck or 18 wheeler for everything my wife would want to take with 3 mos. warning. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#34 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:35 pm

ronjon wrote:The NAM I agree is one of the most agressive cyclone developers amongst the pack of models. CMC comes in a close second. So I'm very skeptical. With that said, the latest 18Z GFS does show a low pressure system in the western caribbean. It appears to lose it as the system moves up into the GOM but I think there may be something here to eyeball over the next week. "Tis the season. Oh, and weren't the CMC and NAM the first models to develop Alberto. And isn't the NAM doing the best job on the low pressure off the coast of SC. Just some random thoughts. :lol:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Besides, realize that the NAM was developing Alberto into a major in the Caribbean.

Not unless I see model agreement that last several runs, will I be interested. That's usually my motto. Even so, the big guns are usually the Euro and the GFS, and I tend to trust them more than other models. Usually, in terms of tropical development, CMC and NAM are the worst since they go all gung-ho over everything. At most, IMO, this will be a tropical low or a depression, if it even develops.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6667
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#35 Postby Cyclenall » Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:52 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Best line I have heard today!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#36 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:06 pm

:eek:
:)
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#37 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:10 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
ronjon wrote:The NAM I agree is one of the most agressive cyclone developers amongst the pack of models. CMC comes in a close second. So I'm very skeptical. With that said, the latest 18Z GFS does show a low pressure system in the western caribbean. It appears to lose it as the system moves up into the GOM but I think there may be something here to eyeball over the next week. "Tis the season. Oh, and weren't the CMC and NAM the first models to develop Alberto. And isn't the NAM doing the best job on the low pressure off the coast of SC. Just some random thoughts. :lol:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Besides, realize that the NAM was developing Alberto into a major in the Caribbean.

Not unless I see model agreement that last several runs, will I be interested. That's usually my motto. Even so, the big guns are usually the Euro and the GFS, and I tend to trust them more than other models. Usually, in terms of tropical development, CMC and NAM are the worst since they go all gung-ho over everything. At most, IMO, this will be a tropical low or a depression, if it even develops.
The NAM never forecasted Alberto to be a major in the Caribbean. The strongest I saw it forecast was about 996mb.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9490
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#38 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:34 pm

Maybe we should lock this thread and continue in the GOM thread.......seems like we got the same discussion going on.....
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4839
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#39 Postby ronjon » Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:35 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
ronjon wrote:The NAM I agree is one of the most agressive cyclone developers amongst the pack of models. CMC comes in a close second. So I'm very skeptical. With that said, the latest 18Z GFS does show a low pressure system in the western caribbean. It appears to lose it as the system moves up into the GOM but I think there may be something here to eyeball over the next week. "Tis the season. Oh, and weren't the CMC and NAM the first models to develop Alberto. And isn't the NAM doing the best job on the low pressure off the coast of SC. Just some random thoughts. :lol:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Besides, realize that the NAM was developing Alberto into a major in the Caribbean.

Not unless I see model agreement that last several runs, will I be interested. That's usually my motto. Even so, the big guns are usually the Euro and the GFS, and I tend to trust them more than other models. Usually, in terms of tropical development, CMC and NAM are the worst since they go all gung-ho over everything. At most, IMO, this will be a tropical low or a depression, if it even develops.


Personally, I like the one that even a blind squirrel can find an acorn once in a while. :D Well, if the PRO METs think its worth watching (and even start a thread about it), then we all need to watch it.

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 78#1421378
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#40 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:38 pm

We will just have to wait intill more models show it deeloping...Its the model trend that is needed to watch. Also if a strong tropical storm weak hurricane was going to hit New orleans, with the levy's the way they are. Would it top it again?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], islandgirl45, Killjoy12, MarioProtVI, Miami Storm Tracker, NingNing and 47 guests