Invest 93L,E of Florida,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #2

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4022
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#301 Postby AJC3 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:55 am

Thunder44 wrote:[b]999
WHXX01 KWBC 191338
CHGHUR

<guidance snipped>




Throw that entire suite of guidance out. It has been persistently showing a much faster movement to the SW-WSW, owing to deeper layer steering, which has not and will not manifest itself.

BAMS or even a slower than BAMS motion will wind up bonecrushing the rest of the track guidance.
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#302 Postby CronkPSU » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:00 am

Thunder44 wrote:
CronkPSU wrote:ships=57 kts???


Most of the models take the storm into the GOM. Also the ships doesn't take into account, land interaction.


ahh OK, even if it goes into the GOM I can't see it getting that strong that quick after going over the penisula
0 likes   

caneman

#303 Postby caneman » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:00 am

AJC3 wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:[b]999
WHXX01 KWBC 191338
CHGHUR

<guidance snipped>




Throw that entire suite of guidance out. It has been persistently showing a much faster movement to the SW-WSW, owing to deeper layer steering, which has not and will not manifest itself.

BAMS or even a slower than BAMS motion will wind up bonecrushing the rest of the track guidance.


Lets ask a Pro Met. Why is this not a depression?
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#304 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:06 am

AJC3 wrote:
Thunder44 wrote:[b]999
WHXX01 KWBC 191338
CHGHUR

<guidance snipped>




Throw that entire suite of guidance out. It has been persistently showing a much faster movement to the SW-WSW, owing to deeper layer steering, which has not and will not manifest itself.

BAMS or even a slower than BAMS motion will wind up bonecrushing the rest of the track guidance.


Yeah, I've notice system has been moving alot slower these models have forecasted.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4022
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#305 Postby AJC3 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:08 am

caneman wrote:
Lets ask a Pro Met. Why is this not a depression?



My guess, and one which has been pointed out previously in this thread, is that the subjective interpretation of the specialists is that the convection associated with the low:

1) has not quite been of sufficient areal coverage about the center
2) has not been generated via entirely tropical processes (i.e. the convection, while being generated near and south of the center, has been sporadic, and jet-aided)

to qualify as a TD.

There's no doubt that there is:

1) A closed LLC
2) sustained winds of 20-25kt

But the subjective criterion of persistent convection around the low level center has yet to be met, at least in the mind of specialists.


Keep in mind that this system is not being "ignored" at all, and is well handled in the suite of products from TAFB, and the local WFO's.

We all know that there's an "almost-TD" out there. We also know YOMV.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#306 Postby curtadams » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:10 am

CronkPSU wrote:ships=57 kts???

Ships "pretends" that the system won't interact with land, which this one probably will. Look at the DSHIPS, which does account for land.

This system is exhibit A in why the NHC should just report what's there and not ignore systems because, as some suggested yesterday, it would evaporate quickly and be no threat to land. It didn't evaporate (surprising everybody - but since when do we know everything about these storms) but now to upgrade requires saying it strengthened substantially under 40+ kts shear. The truth is that it just maintained its strength but now the TD that wasn't there is about to come ashore on Jacksonville and it's not even out of the question for it to become a TS. Actually, with one particular buoy measuring 25 kts at 5 meter elevation, there's a very good chance it's already Debby. Aircraft measurements are essentially always higher than the highest buoy measurements.
0 likes   

caneman

#307 Postby caneman » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:12 am

AJC3 wrote:
caneman wrote:
Lets ask a Pro Met. Why is this not a depression?



My guess, and one which has been pointed out previously in this thread, is that the subjective interpretation of the specialists is that the convection associated with the low:

1) has not quite been of sufficient areal coverage about the center
2) has not been generated via entirely tropical processes (i.e. the convection, while being generated near and south of the center, has been sporadic, and jet-aided)

to qualify as a TD.

There's no doubt that there is:

1) A closed LLC
2) sustained winds of 20-25kt

But the subjective criterion of persistent convection around the low level center has yet to be met, at least in the mind of specialists.


Keep in mind that this system is not being "ignored" at all, and is well handled in the suite of products from TAFB, and the local WFO's.

We all know that there's an "almost-TD" out there. We also know YOMV.


OK, I'll bite. clue me in :wink: We also know YOMV
0 likes   

StormsAhead
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts

#308 Postby StormsAhead » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:13 am

Your opinion may vary?
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 4022
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

#309 Postby AJC3 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:15 am

StormsAhead wrote:Your opinion may vary?



yuppers.
0 likes   

caneman

#310 Postby caneman » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:16 am

Looks to me like NHC may have a little egg on their face. Loo kate blowup of intense storms.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconusir.html
0 likes   

caneman

#311 Postby caneman » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:17 am

And LLC looks to be mostly covered now on visible. I'd be shocked if they don't upgrade now.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#312 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:18 am

On radar those strong thunderstorms just to the south of the center appeared to have weakened greatly in the last few mins. There are plenty other showers and thunderstorm rotating around the center right now.
0 likes   

StormsAhead
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts

#313 Postby StormsAhead » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:19 am

caneman wrote:And LLC looks to be mostly covered now. I'd be shocked if they don't upgrade now.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconus.html


I wouldn't. :wink:

But maybe after the season is over...like the unnamed storm last year.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146178
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#314 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:19 am

What about having recon baby!!! :lol:
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

caneman

#315 Postby caneman » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:20 am

cycloneye wrote:What about having recon baby!!! :lol:


They don't need a plane. I'll take my boat out about 30 miles and check it out :eek:
Not!
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#316 Postby CronkPSU » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:24 am

caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote:What about having recon baby!!! :lol:


They don't need a plane. I'll take my boat out about 30 miles and check it out :eek:
Not!


LOL where are derek and the jet skiiers?
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#317 Postby CronkPSU » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:25 am

AJC3 wrote:
caneman wrote:
Lets ask a Pro Met. Why is this not a depression?



My guess, and one which has been pointed out previously in this thread, is that the subjective interpretation of the specialists is that the convection associated with the low:

1) has not quite been of sufficient areal coverage about the center
2) has not been generated via entirely tropical processes (i.e. the convection, while being generated near and south of the center, has been sporadic, and jet-aided)

to qualify as a TD.

There's no doubt that there is:

1) A closed LLC
2) sustained winds of 20-25kt

But the subjective criterion of persistent convection around the low level center has yet to be met, at least in the mind of specialists.


Keep in mind that this system is not being "ignored" at all, and is well handled in the suite of products from TAFB, and the local WFO's.

We all know that there's an "almost-TD" out there. We also know YOMV.



thanks!
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1433
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

#318 Postby Emmett_Brown » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:25 am

10 am Conditions here in Jax:

Dense overcast
Wind N/NW 5-10
Barometer 29.96
Humidity 75%

Quite calm out there now, but the sky is very tropical looking. Slight orange glow to the north, similar being on the edge of a CDO. I know that this is just a brief blowup, but the CDO of nearby tropical systems always gives us the same look.
0 likes   

Seele
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:14 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#319 Postby Seele » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:29 am

They won't upgrade it based on just the blowup this morning. It's getting badly sheared and the convection is already on the decrease. On radar, the deeper reds on the SE part of the circulation (which is where the big blowup was coming from) have almost vanished in the last hour.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#320 Postby Stormcenter » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:44 am

It looks like it's moving inland to me but it's hard to tell. Anyway, I can't get over had bad the shear throughout the GOM and Carribean.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 7cardinal, duilaslol, Ulf and 46 guests