Tropical Season offically now below normal.... by a hair

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2777
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Tropical Season offically now below normal.... by a hair

#1 Postby Frank P » Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:39 pm

http://www.weatherstreet.com/hurricane/ ... season.htm

statistically speaking per WeatherSreet its below normal at the moment... but only by a fraction... the are contributing the lack of storms due to lower SSTs... My opinion is that the Mr. Shear has been playing havoc with the waves thus far and has been more a contributor to an overall lack of development ..... more so than SSTs... not to say things can't change in a hurry....

regardless....

I hope no one gets hit by a hurricane this year.......... especially me..
0 likes   

User avatar
Regit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2341
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Myrtle Beach

#2 Postby Regit » Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:45 pm

I would say SSTs have had no effect in inhibiting development this year.

That being said, the fact that we are fractionally below normal is completely irrelevant.

You need only look at current conditions and trends

Hypothetically, let's say you have 85 degree seas with favorable upper level conditions and lots of moisture in February. The fact that February is historically a slow month is completely irrelevant when you have such good conditions.
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2777
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

#3 Postby Frank P » Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:51 pm

Regit wrote:I would say SSTs have had no effect in inhibiting development this year.

That being said, the fact that we are fractionally below normal is completely irrelevant.

You need only look at current conditions and trends

Hypothetically, let's say you have 85 degree seas with favorable upper level conditions and lots of moisture in February. The fact that February is historically a slow month is completely irrelevant when you have such good conditions.


Well it is in the sense that prior to the season most experts and non experts were predicting a very active year, an above normal year...... if it turns out only to be "just normal" (whether or not it does remains to be seen) then most everyone would have been off in their predictions... from what we've gone thru from the past two seasons... just "normal" would be a nice break...
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

#4 Postby canegrl04 » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:09 pm

If we don't see a hurricane before the end of August,I would say this year is going to turn out abnormally low
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5196
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#5 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:13 pm

Like you said, it's below by a fraction, but.....not for long.... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
28_Storms
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Miami Dade

#6 Postby 28_Storms » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:14 pm

Maybe that 5% chance of a below normal season just came true?
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#7 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sun Aug 20, 2006 3:18 pm

Below normal is GOOD! :D

May it stay that way!

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

Deputy Van Halen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:00 am
Location: Texas City, TX

#8 Postby Deputy Van Halen » Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:55 pm

If we don't see a hurricane before the end of August,I would say this year is going to turn out abnormally low


I don't even know if I would say that. In 2001, the first hurricane (Erin) didn't form until Sept. 9, and that was an above-average season.

If I tallied these right, there were four other seasons in the last 50 years with no hurricanes before September: 1967, 1984, 1988, and 2002. (I'm probably repeating what others have said).

1967 is the only one of those seasons that was significantly below average. The others were near average or only slightly below.

It looks like the latest first-cane was Gustav in 2002, on Sept. 11. If there are still no hurricanes by 9/12/06, I'd say slow season for sure!
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#9 Postby AussieMark » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:07 pm

to expand a bit on what Deputy Van Halen said

the first Hurricane of 2001 was Erin on September 9

the 2001 season ended up with 9 hurricanes that year and 4 were major
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6369
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

#10 Postby boca » Sun Aug 20, 2006 8:55 pm

Even if the water temps were in the upper 80's basin wide which would never happen but hypothetically if we had the shear we have now nothing would form.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, pepeavilenho and 50 guests