SouthFloridawx wrote:If this is an upper level feature right?
How would that affect the mid to low level ridge in the Atlantic?
....
If the UTT does not weaken the ridge and the system remains in the low levels to lower mid levels we won't see recurvature.
Yes, it is mostly an upper level feature, and I would normally be cautious about using 200mb to determine any sort of steering patterns. However, in this case, the 200mb potential vorticity anomaly is large enough and strong enough to cause a vorticity signature further below at 500mb, e.g., which can affect the steering flow for tropical cyclones if they are strong enough. If one simply looked at the 500mb vorticity forecast, it would appear as though the disturbance (i.e. the weakness in the ridge) sort of pops out from no where... since there are no significant mid-latitude shortwaves approaching the area, and one might be quite suspicious of what the GFS and other models are depicting. However, the source of the weakness if further aloft initially as indicated by the tropopause analysis maps and is well initialized by the models. I feel the weakness in the ridge at the mid-levels should eventually develop from the top down. BTW, here's the latest tropopause map from the 06Z GFS analysis from SUNY Albany still showing that tongue of greens indicating a depressed tropopause (cyclonic vorticity at upper levels):
http://www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/rm ... 082206.jpg
Your second point about the system remaining a shallow, weak system is completely valid. Then, only the low level steering would matter, and the upper level feature doesn't not have any projection/signature at low levels and would only serve to increase the deep layer shear over the system.