DNA not a match in JonBenet Ramsey murder case... whoops

Janice · #221 Postby **Janice** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:29 pm

Did he tell the Professor he killed JonBenet? Maybe the Professor tied him to this murder and no one else is available to tie him to others.

rainstorm · #222 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:01 pm

but why did he only tell this professor about this one murder?. lets face it, until they can prove beyond reasonable doubt he was even in boulder when the murder occured, its all a moot point. since there is no evidence whatsoever he had ever heard of the ramseys prior to the murder he would have had to spemd a long time in boulder just to find someone to murder, then plan how to do it and get away with it. it should be simple to prove he was there, IF HE WAS THERE.

but that begs another question. why go to all that trouble when there were lots of girls close to home he could kill?

rainstorm · #223 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:08 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:From what little I've seen. They better replace his defense team, or else he might have grounds to dismiss later on. Very inept and WAY to chatty. Obviously enjoying their 15 minutes of fame.

this is something that bothers me alot. the ramsey's, who i still feel are the likely killers, can afford the finest defense money can buy, while this guy has to rely on far less quality in his defense.

Website · #224 Postby **Brent** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:28 pm

He's on his way to Colorado right now.

#225 Postby **streetsoldier** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:55 pm

rainstorm wrote:but why did he only tell this professor about this one murder?. lets face it, until they can prove beyond reasonable doubt he was even in boulder when the murder occured, its all a moot point. since there is no evidence whatsoever he had ever heard of the ramseys prior to the murder he would have had to spemd a long time in boulder just to find someone to murder, then plan how to do it and get away with it. it should be simple to prove he was there, IF HE WAS THERE.

but that begs another question. why go to all that trouble when there were lots of girls close to home he could kill?

JonBenet's "celebrity" status, and the fact that she was undeniably beautiful...that would be more than enough for any sleazebag, y'think?

#226 Postby **Cookiely** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:37 pm

rainstorm wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:From what little I've seen. They better replace his defense team, or else he might have grounds to dismiss later on. Very inept and WAY to chatty. Obviously enjoying their 15 minutes of fame.

this is something that bothers me alot. the ramsey's, who i still feel are the likely killers, can afford the finest defense money can buy, while this guy has to rely on far less quality in his defense.

I wouldn't worry too much about his defense because I don't think this will ever get to trial. He is already making excuses about his DNA not matching. If his DNA doesn't match, there is no case! He confessed years ago and they didn't take him seriously. I do wonder if he might not have chatted with the real killer online.

Janice · #227 Postby **Janice** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:11 pm

How would he know if his DNA matched or not. I doubt anyone would tell him the results. If he knew the results, you can bet the media knows them. We would all know.

rainstorm · #228 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:26 pm

Janice wrote:How would he know if his DNA matched or not. I doubt anyone would tell him the results. If he knew the results, you can bet the media knows them. We would all know.

he would know if his dna matched very easily. if he wasnt there it dont match. just i know my dna wont be found in nome alaska, lol

rainstorm · #229 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:33 pm

streetsoldier wrote:
rainstorm wrote:but why did he only tell this professor about this one murder?. lets face it, until they can prove beyond reasonable doubt he was even in boulder when the murder occured, its all a moot point. since there is no evidence whatsoever he had ever heard of the ramseys prior to the murder he would have had to spemd a long time in boulder just to find someone to murder, then plan how to do it and get away with it. it should be simple to prove he was there, IF HE WAS THERE.

but that begs another question. why go to all that trouble when there were lots of girls close to home he could kill?

JonBenet's "celebrity" status, and the fact that she was undeniably beautiful...that would be more than enough for any sleazebag, y'think?

but there is no evidence he knew of her until after he became fascinated by her death. and again, its preposterous he took off for what must have been a very long time when he had numerous victims close at hand

rainstorm · #230 Postby **rainstorm** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:36 pm

i am beginning to fear that this DA, rather than be humilated in public for being fooled by a kook, will railroad this man into a conviction.

#231 Postby **alicia-w** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:02 pm

this guy is weird enough that even if he didnt commit this murder, he did jump bail on other crimes (possession of child pornography). maybe locking him up is a darned good idea. i'm not sure why there are so many folks jumping to his defense. even if he WANTS to be the one who killed her (but didnt) he needs to go away for a very long time, and not to Thailand.

Lindaloo · #232 Postby **Lindaloo** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:50 pm

That is absolutely correct alice. Those that jump to his defense are annoying as heck to me.

rainstorm · #233 Postby **rainstorm** » Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:16 pm

perhaps we "jump" to his defense because we dont want him convicted of a crime he didnt committ. do any of us want that to happen to us? its dangerous thinking to say he should be convicted because he is a rotten human being. there are more than 1 example of rogue prosecutors going after someone.

i still feel strongly the ramseys committed the crime and i think its horrifying that they can manipulate the prosecutors and police in boulder because of their money, and mr karr has to rely on a substandard defense.

if the prosecutor can prove he did it, fine. until then i will continue to "jump' to mr karr's defense.

Website · #234 Postby **Brent** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:34 pm

KUSA in Denver reports the DNA results are in and the DNA at the Ramsey murder scene DOES NOT match Karr's DNA.

sunny · #235 Postby **sunny** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:36 pm

Brent wrote:KUSA in Denver reports the DNA results are in and the DNA at the Ramsey murder scene DOES NOT match Karr's DNA.

Oops.

rainstorm · #236 Postby **rainstorm** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:45 pm

i still fear this rogue DA will attempt to railroad mr karr into a conviction. i will continue to jump to mr karr's defense.

JTD · #237 Postby **JTD** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:56 pm

Disappointing. So much hope that this case would finally be solved and 10 years of pain would be over.

There is no doubt in my mind now that Mr. Karr is innocent. He probably talked to the real killer on some child pornography chat room or something.

Also, at this time, suspicion must again fall on the Ramseys and Mr. Ramsey in particular.

Website · #238 Postby **Brent** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:59 pm

9NEWS has also learned the Boulder County District Attorney's office will not file charges against Karr in connection with the Ramsey case.

http://www.kusa.com/

and we're back to square one.

rainstorm · #239 Postby **rainstorm** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:05 pm

i heard they will not file charges today, not that they wont file charges at all

rainstorm · #240 Postby **rainstorm** » Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:11 pm

thank god, i just heard on the radio that you are right brent, no charges. i hope this is true and an innocent man wont be convicted

DNA not a match in JonBenet Ramsey murder case... whoops

Who is online