O Town wrote:TampaFl wrote:
link does not work. Here is the 2:00AM plots.
http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png
Both links are bad.........Forbidden Error.
Both work for me.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
O Town wrote:TampaFl wrote:
link does not work. Here is the 2:00AM plots.
http://euler.atmos.colostate.edu/~vigh/ ... early1.png
Both links are bad.........Forbidden Error.
tgenius wrote:Don't know how important, but the 8am dropped NW speed from 14 to 13... don't know if 1mph is going to be a big deal, or is it? (Perhaps the beginning of a trend?
linkerweather wrote:tgenius wrote:Don't know how important, but the 8am dropped NW speed from 14 to 13... don't know if 1mph is going to be a big deal, or is it? (Perhaps the beginning of a trend?
8 AM is still at 14 mph
But I am a bit suprised that the NHC still has it NW, it moved from 5 am 0.2 N and 0.4 west.
Also, recon and EYW radar seem to indicate WNW if not just north of west movement
johngaltfla wrote:linkerweather wrote:tgenius wrote:Don't know how important, but the 8am dropped NW speed from 14 to 13... don't know if 1mph is going to be a big deal, or is it? (Perhaps the beginning of a trend?
8 AM is still at 14 mph
But I am a bit suprised that the NHC still has it NW, it moved from 5 am 0.2 N and 0.4 west.
Also, recon and EYW radar seem to indicate WNW if not just north of west movement
Thank you Mr. Linker, I wasn't hallucinating then. If we still see a WNW movement in 12 hours, or by 1700, do you expect watches, etc. to be extended up into our neck of the woods?
linkerweather wrote:tgenius wrote:Don't know how important, but the 8am dropped NW speed from 14 to 13... don't know if 1mph is going to be a big deal, or is it? (Perhaps the beginning of a trend?
8 AM is still at 14 mph
But I am a bit suprised that the NHC still has it NW, it moved from 5 am 0.2 N and 0.4 west.
Also, recon and EYW radar seem to indicate WNW if not just north of west movement.
By the way, if my eyesight is correct the 5 am track had it passing 80 W at 24 North
linkerweather wrote:tgenius wrote:Don't know how important, but the 8am dropped NW speed from 14 to 13... don't know if 1mph is going to be a big deal, or is it? (Perhaps the beginning of a trend?
8 AM is still at 14 mph
But I am a bit suprised that the NHC still has it NW, it moved from 5 am 0.2 N and 0.4 west.
Also, recon and EYW radar seem to indicate WNW if not just north of west movement.
By the way, if my eyesight is correct the 5 am track had it passing 80 W at 24 North
tgenius wrote:Not trying to be conflictive, but it IS 13mph, not 14mph.
http://icons.wunderground.com/data/images/at200605.gif
SWLA wrote:The storm appears to be directly under the axis of the high to its north. That's why the movement has a more westerly component right now. Should begin to turn more northerly pretty soon as the high is sliding eastward off the east coast.
SWLA wrote:The storm appears to be directly under the axis of the high to its north. That's why the movement has a more westerly component right now. Should begin to turn more northerly pretty soon as the high is sliding eastward off the east coast.
linkerweather wrote:SWLA wrote:The storm appears to be directly under the axis of the high to its north. That's why the movement has a more westerly component right now. Should begin to turn more northerly pretty soon as the high is sliding eastward off the east coast.
The western edge of the high is still about 100 miles into the GOM. It should move soon, but it hasn't yet, No northward move at least through this afternoon, IMO
Users browsing this forum: fllawyer, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Hurricanehink and 57 guests