GFDL brings Florence down to 934MB in 126 hours

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
zlaxier
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:44 pm

GFDL brings Florence down to 934MB in 126 hours

#1 Postby zlaxier » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:18 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146154
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#2 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:19 pm

That was posted already almost an hour and a half ago at the TD 6 thread.
0 likes   

User avatar
DelrayMorris
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Delray Beach, FL

#3 Postby DelrayMorris » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:22 pm

:eek: :eek:

Um... lets hope that's one of those cases where "we are not skilled at intensity forecasts"... or whatever it was they said in the Ernesto forecasts. Cause that's a CAT5 (says winds of 137 knots).

Or am I reading that wrong?
0 likes   

User avatar
Downdraft
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Sanford, Florida
Contact:

#4 Postby Downdraft » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:38 pm

Thought we were letting the NHC give them names? I can't find Florence on their site anywhere at the moment other than the next name to be assigned.
0 likes   

User avatar
SCMedic
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

#5 Postby SCMedic » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:40 pm

Downdraft wrote:Thought we were letting the NHC give them names? I can't find Florence on their site anywhere at the moment other than the next name to be assigned.



I believe that falls under sarcastic and rude to other members. Where's the ban police??
0 likes   

Rainband

#6 Postby Rainband » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:49 pm

SCMedic wrote:
Downdraft wrote:Thought we were letting the NHC give them names? I can't find Florence on their site anywhere at the moment other than the next name to be assigned.



I believe that falls under sarcastic and rude to other members. Where's the ban police??
Actually it's not named and it wasn't rude. Your comment was though. Ban Police??
0 likes   

User avatar
SCMedic
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 7:05 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

#7 Postby SCMedic » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:52 pm

Actually, mine was more tongue in cheek. :) I do agree with the fact that we shouldn't be calling storms names before they are.

What's the deal with everyone being on edge around here lately?
0 likes   

User avatar
huricanwatcher
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 893
Age: 65
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Kirkwood NY
Contact:

#8 Postby huricanwatcher » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:54 pm

90L or (FLO) has very feathery , whisper edges ..... which IMO .. is showing that the wrap around is inevidable and just waiting to put on the power.. Watched too many BIG storms start out this way...
Last edited by huricanwatcher on Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#9 Postby rockyman » Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:02 pm

Actually, if GFDL is forecasting this to be the next named storm, it might be technically correct to say "GFDL brings Florence..."...Maybe a better title would be "GFDL brings what could be Florence down to 934MB in 126 hours"

:)
0 likes   

Josephine96

#10 Postby Josephine96 » Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:36 pm

"GFDL brings #6/Florence" :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6372
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

#11 Postby boca » Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:46 pm

I worked with a Flo so were in trouble with this one where ever it strikes. I think the speed is a little to quick with Aunt Flo on the 11pm advisory.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#12 Postby Aslkahuna » Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:08 pm

I think that the testiness is due to TCDS (Tropical Cyclone Deprivation Syndrome).

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#13 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:20 pm

I believe this answers why the GFDL went "crazy" in a sense:
LATER IN THE FORECAST
PERIOD...THE UPPER-LEVEL ENVIRONMENT IS PREDICTED TO BECOME MORE
CONDUCIVE FOR STRENGTHENING. THE OFFICIAL INTENSITY FORECAST IS
VERY SIMILAR TO THE SHIPS GUIDANCE IN THE LATTER PART OF THE
PERIOD...BUT BELOW THE 1800 UTC GFDL GUIDANCE IN 4-5 DAYS. WE
BELIEVE THAT THIS PARTICULAR RUN OF THE GFDL MODEL HAD A HIGH
INTENSITY BIAS DUE TO PROBLEMS WITH THE OCEAN COUPLING.
however...it could be from TCDS to, but I think the models have been producing enough phantom storms this year to keep them satisfied...:lol:
0 likes   

caneman

#14 Postby caneman » Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:25 pm

Getting quite a few models latching on with consistency and agreement. In a year of very little model consistency and agreement, this looks to be one to really watch
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#15 Postby Jim Cantore » Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:01 pm

Aslkahuna wrote:I think that the testiness is due to TCDS (Tropical Cyclone Deprivation Syndrome).

Steve


I think we've discovered a new disease. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#16 Postby Wthrman13 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:21 am

Aslkahuna wrote:I think that the testiness is due to TCDS (Tropical Cyclone Deprivation Syndrome).

Steve


Closely related and often concurrent with SDS (Supercell Deprivation Syndrome).
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#17 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:25 am

Wthrman13 wrote:
Aslkahuna wrote:I think that the testiness is due to TCDS (Tropical Cyclone Deprivation Syndrome).

Steve


Closely related and often concurrent with SDS (Supercell Deprivation Syndrome).


I definitely have a really bad case of that, though it's improved lately due to the August 24 event. But during summer, boy you don't want to know...

Anyway, SDS are probably at record high levels this year. Here's an explanation... http://home1.gte.net/txt/SDS.htm
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#18 Postby Wthrman13 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:04 am

wxmann_91 wrote:
Wthrman13 wrote:
Aslkahuna wrote:I think that the testiness is due to TCDS (Tropical Cyclone Deprivation Syndrome).

Steve


Closely related and often concurrent with SDS (Supercell Deprivation Syndrome).


I definitely have a really bad case of that, though it's improved lately due to the August 24 event. But during summer, boy you don't want to know...

Anyway, SDS are probably at record high levels this year. Here's an explanation... http://home1.gte.net/txt/SDS.htm


Indeed, if it weren't for the April 24th El Reno, OK tornadoes, my case might have had to be referred to specialists! Short term relief, however, is provided by repeated viewings of Tim Samaras's tornado video probe footage ;)
0 likes   

User avatar
TampaSteve
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 4:05 pm
Location: Riverview, FL

#19 Postby TampaSteve » Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:33 am

Wthrman13 wrote:
wxmann_91 wrote:
Wthrman13 wrote:
Aslkahuna wrote:I think that the testiness is due to TCDS (Tropical Cyclone Deprivation Syndrome).

Steve


Closely related and often concurrent with SDS (Supercell Deprivation Syndrome).


I definitely have a really bad case of that, though it's improved lately due to the August 24 event. But during summer, boy you don't want to know...

Anyway, SDS are probably at record high levels this year. Here's an explanation... http://home1.gte.net/txt/SDS.htm


Indeed, if it weren't for the April 24th El Reno, OK tornadoes, my case might have had to be referred to specialists! Short term relief, however, is provided by repeated viewings of Tim Samaras's tornado video probe footage ;)


Damn...that F4 just smashed that house...bam...gone... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5350
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#20 Postby Nimbus » Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:42 am

Strong storms seem to attract troughs so intensification could end up being a good thing steeringwise. There is no land interaction and once the current trough moves northeast there will be less shear. This is September afterall so 934 sounds reasonable.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beef Stew, Hurricaneman, jgh, Keldeo1997, SconnieCane and 58 guests