Legal issues when making forecasts

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#21 Postby mf_dolphin » Wed Sep 13, 2006 12:33 am

Actually case law protects the owners of an internet forum in this type of case. Only when notified of slanderous/copywritten/etc type material and failing to take action could the owners be at fault. If you'll remember back when you joined there is actually a statement that says that the posts are the sole work of the author ;-)
0 likes   

User avatar
hiflyer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 563
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:24 am
Location: West Broward Florida

#22 Postby hiflyer » Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:02 am

Yes...but his well-written, good punctuation, proper spelling thesis for his first post on his day of joining was a legal question targeted to websites linked off of S2k...or her.

The game is afoot.
Sir Arther Connan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes
0 likes   

User avatar
WxGuy1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Oklahoma

#23 Postby WxGuy1 » Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:16 am

Can I sue someone (and win) if I read their opinion on some stock only to lose everything when it plummets? Can I sue and win if someone says that the Xbox 7232910 will be the next big thing, only to end up losing money because it ISN'T the next big thing? Most people realize these are OPINIONS, and sueing for taking action on the opinion of any person on here seems baseless. In that case, YOU'RE the ignorant one for believing that person. If I say Hurricane BS will weaken to a TS and hit FL, while it really goes Cat 8 and hits Long Island (with the official NHC forecast indicating correctly), and you lose because you didn't prepare because you read "some guy's" forecast "on some forum", that's you're own fault. The day the user making the amateur forecast gets sued is the day any talk about the future of stocks or the market is illegal, and the speculation or discussion about anything pertaining to the future becomes criminal.

Of course, when I say "you", I'm not explicity referring to YOU, the person who started this thread! The "you" is the person who reads a forecast here and sues because it's incorrect. Most folks on here probably give their best forecast, so in no way am I insinuating anything about the quality of forecasts. 8-)
0 likes   

Truth Seeker
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:46 pm

#24 Postby Truth Seeker » Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:18 pm

Ah... very interesting commentary on this subject from many posters. Back in 2002, Klein and Pielke wrote a 2-part AMS Journal on the very subject of "suing for the weatherman" both in the government and private sectors and broke down the many cases involving liability in the face of natural events and the limit of predictability.

I close with a few remarks. Many of you are correct, there is probably no way someone could successfully sue an errant forecast. But then in civil law its not about who is right, its about who presents the best argument and sways the judge or jury to that argument. In turn, most people would win the suit, but the cost of defending it is quite high - probably in the tens of thousands of dollars creeping up to astronomical dollar numbers which is why a good amount of cases settle out of court.

Anyways, good luck with those individuals testing their prognostic abilities. I have enjoyed the lively debate on such a sensitive topic. The "Truth Seeker" now signs off and shall not return. :wink:
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#25 Postby Bailey1777 » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:08 pm

Sorry mod's but I gotta do it "What a nerd!"
0 likes   

TheShrimper
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:05 pm

#26 Postby TheShrimper » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:31 pm

Good, keep true to your word, and don't ask questions again that in your mind, you already have the answers to.
0 likes   

User avatar
Downdraft
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Sanford, Florida
Contact:

#27 Postby Downdraft » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:33 pm

First off, hurricanes and weather in general is deemed "an act of God." That's kind of funny considering today's politically correct climate but none the less a forecast is an opinion. The only possible way I could see someone getting sued is if they misrepresented themselves to be something they are not; i.e. an agent of the NHC or National Weather Service. Secondly you'd have to prove that what they told you caused you damage. Pretending to issue an evacuation order which you could reasonably believe to be valid and acting upon it at your expense.
On the internet let the buyer beware. If someone chooses to take action based upon the forecasts found on a weather board over the forecasts found on the NHC website they might find a lawyer to take their case but they'd also find a judge that would throw it out.
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#28 Postby Bailey1777 » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:35 pm

AMEN!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#29 Postby KatDaddy » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:42 pm

Truth Seeker I give you credit for your intensity but there are many more battles for you to win outside of the tropics.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7210
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#30 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:15 pm

TheShrimper wrote:Good, keep true to your word, and don't ask questions again that in your mind, you already have the answers to.


Hopefully he/she hit the law library like i suggested last night and we get free full report on the findings in about 10 months or so.
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#31 Postby Bailey1777 » Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:21 pm

The sad thing to me is that this seems like a very intellectual person looking for a crowd to wow, when instead they could be doing something really usefull with their time.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#32 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:25 pm

I feel that this is a legit question, and one I considered when starting NWHHC in 2002

A statement releasing users from all liability linked form the home page stating that the forecasts are independent or non official for public disclosure should be used, so that the general public knows that it is not official gov't information

I even did this on the nwhhc site during RAINEX last year when the forecasts were the official RAINEX forecasts, because the official use was NOT for the general public, only for the field program
0 likes   

User avatar
Robjohn53
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:03 pm
Location: Mims Florida

#33 Postby Robjohn53 » Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:25 pm

This site to me is awsome i like coming here to learn and try to understand these things, but tonight i learned a very very valuable lesson on top of it all and that is: Never Never ask that question here lmao. Although this topic never crossed my mind, i am so glad i read this thread....Always nice to know what not to do..hehehe
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#34 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:37 pm

I personally don't see any problem in having a option about tropical cyclones...Heck the first Amement gives us the right to have a option. A whole lot worst gets said in allowed in this country, in that should be allowed. But its still your right to say. We should all stand by are freedoms. Where doe's it say that we can not discuse are love of hurricanes(Forecast)them? I'v never came across it if you or it has.

I went to be linked to the law that says we can't make forecast?
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#35 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:40 pm

Also I been making my forecast/option on cyclones for years. If I'm going to get into this...Then all that are founding fathers gave to us is gone!

I should be in jail right now for making all the forecast I make! :lol:
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#36 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:53 pm

mf_dolphin wrote:Actually case law protects the owners of an internet forum in this type of case. Only when notified of slanderous/copywritten/etc type material and failing to take action could the owners be at fault. If you'll remember back when you joined there is actually a statement that says that the posts are the sole work of the author ;-)


I got a quastion...If you or storm2k can't get into trouble over it, in people should know that this is a place for nonpro's to discuse. Then why the disclaimer? This is a quastion I been wenting to ask.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

#37 Postby CajunMama » Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:13 am

Matt, we stress that people heed their local mets and the NHC who are professionals. You use our disclaimer because you are not a professional met.
0 likes   

Una
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:17 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Contact:

#38 Postby Una » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:45 am

mf_dolphin wrote:Actually case law protects the owners of an internet forum in this type of case. Only when notified of slanderous/copywritten/etc type material and failing to take action could the owners be at fault. If you'll remember back when you joined there is actually a statement that says that the posts are the sole work of the author ;-)


You may wish to meet with your legal council again about that.
The way my attorney explained it to me was as soon as someone in an official position makes any changes (moderator/admin editing posts) you lose all those protections because you set precedent as to an official position of allowing/disallowing content.
I may have misinterpreted something, but I believe that was the gist of it.
0 likes   

User avatar
hial2
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Indian trail N.C.

#39 Postby hial2 » Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:56 am

Miami Dade county is asking the feds for money to cover the expenses occurred by failed storm "Ernesto"..apparently,someone is upset because Ernesto wan't the storm the NWC said it was going to be..Isn't this what we're talking about??
0 likes   

kevin

#40 Postby kevin » Thu Sep 14, 2006 10:04 am

Una wrote:
mf_dolphin wrote:Actually case law protects the owners of an internet forum in this type of case. Only when notified of slanderous/copywritten/etc type material and failing to take action could the owners be at fault. If you'll remember back when you joined there is actually a statement that says that the posts are the sole work of the author ;-)


You may wish to meet with your legal council again about that.
The way my attorney explained it to me was as soon as someone in an official position makes any changes (moderator/admin editing posts) you lose all those protections because you set precedent as to an official position of allowing/disallowing content.
I may have misinterpreted something, but I believe that was the gist of it.


Dude your attorney is bad, if you're going to sue this site, do you realize that there will be thousands of dollars donated to cover legal expenses? You'll need a better attorney.

Unless this is a post about how you a message board owner sought legal advice. I'm nervous as to what the percieved threat is, and why its being brought up. Will Storm2k be the next McDonalds lady spilling coffee on her lap, with the coffee being Josephine's forecasts???
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests