Hurricane Katrina's Waves Felt in California.

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5319
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

#21 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:37 pm

wxman57 wrote:I have the wave data for Ivan, Katrina, Rita, and Wilma on my work PC. When you're talking about waves, we mostly refer to the "significant wave", which is the highest 1/3 of all waves. For Ivan, the significant wave height maxed out at 52-53 feet. We also estimate the "occasional" wave, which is about 1.5 times the significant wave (75-80 ft for Ivan). And there are the absolute peak waves. For Ivan, that peak was in the 90-100 ft range. I know of no measurements of waves larger than that from ivan. The only sensors capable of measuring Ivan's large waves were pressure sensors on the sea bed, as buoy 42040 broke free just before Ivan's waves reached their peak.

I think that Wilma's trapped fetch waves were in the 12-15 meter range (40-50 ft). I can check on that tomorrow.


I wouldn't be surprised if there are even higher waves that were not measured because the buoys were all broken free.
0 likes   

User avatar
Swimdude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2270
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Houston, TX

#22 Postby Swimdude » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:40 pm

umguy1 wrote:Wasn't Wilma the most powerful?


He said the most powerful hurricane to "form in the Gulf." Neither Gilbert nor Wilma formed in Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5319
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

#23 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:46 pm

Swimdude wrote:
umguy1 wrote:Wasn't Wilma the most powerful?


He said the most powerful hurricane to "form in the Gulf." Neither Gilbert nor Wilma formed in Gulf.


Both were strongest in the Caribbean. I believe in fact they were at their peak in the same general area. I've seen Gilbert and Wilma photos and they look almost the same.

Wilma's Peak
12 GMT 10/19/05 17.3N 82.8W 185 882 Category 5 Hurricane

Gilbert's Peak
0 GMT 09/14/88 19.7N 83.8W 185 888 Category 5 Hurricane
0 likes   

User avatar
tndefender
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 123
Age: 64
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Germantown, TN

#24 Postby tndefender » Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:36 am

TheShrimper wrote:Why was there not evidence of this happening elsewhere? I find this pretty suspect and coincedential, seeing that there are GRS all over the country, in closer proximity than CA.


Living in Memphis I have become familiar with the Center for Earthquake Research and Information at the University of Memphis. I thought they might have covered this and turns out they have. Very interesting:

http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/katrina/
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23010
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#25 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:06 pm

As I had promised, here is the wave data I saved from Ivan, Katrina, and Wilma. Sorry, no data for Rita.

Ivan's wave trace from Buoy 42040:

Image

Katrina's trapped fetch wave predition. Note that the predicted waves are higher than was observed at buoy 42040 for Ivan. Note that the values in the two figures below are significant wave heights - the highest 1/3 of all waves. Maximum waves were aboug 1.5 to 1.7 times this height.

Image

Finally, here's Wilma. Note that this graphic was prudiced using the NHC Forecast from 4-5 days prior to landfall. The track is incorrect, and the wind radii/speeds were likely incorrect. So the projected trapped fetch wave heights are suspect.

Image
Last edited by wxman57 on Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#26 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:07 pm

WxMan I don't think your track of Wilma in the NW Caribbean is accurate. I believe it moved alot farther west before turning NE and slamming into Florida.

Am I correct?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23010
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#27 Postby wxman57 » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:22 pm

gatorcane wrote:WxMan I don't think your track of Wilma in the NW Caribbean is accurate. I believe it moved alot farther west before turning NE and slamming into Florida.

Am I correct?


That's correct, the graphic was using the NHC forecast at the time. That means the wave heights projected are probably wrong, as I don't think the NHC weakened Wilma as much as it did in that forecast.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#28 Postby Aslkahuna » Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:11 pm

Speaking of Wilma, should be noted that the 882 mb pressure in the storm is the 6th lowest measured pressure in any Tropical Cyclone Globally. There are seven storms with pressures lower than Wilma-Tip '79 with 870mb, June '75 876mb, Ida '58 877mb, Nora '73 877 mb Rita'78 878mb and Vanessa '84 879mb-all typhoons. On an historical note, the first recon flight lost in a WPAC typhoon was lost flying into STY Wilma in 1951.

Steve
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blown Away, Bobbyh83, facemane, Frank P, hurricane2025, islandgirl45, JtSmarts, Kazmit, KeysRedWine, Lizzytiz1, riapal, SFLcane, sunny and 95 guests