Extremeweatherguy wrote:models have shifted west it seems.
LOL..
Were you not the one that reminded a few folks yesterday to take these models with a grain of salt?

Moderator: S2k Moderators
dry air usually doesn't change a storms direction (unless associated with a ridge/trough), instead it would probably just help to weaken it and make it have less convection.dixiebreeze wrote:For now, but look at this water vapor image. It would suggest that the dry air to the west might push it back N and E.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/eaus/wv-l.jpg
yes, do take them with a grain of salt, but even more so yesterday because they were the initial runs. I don't see how pointing out a small difference is me all the sudden saying I trust them though? Of course not. I don't fully trust any model until we have a well-established system that is less than 72 hrs. out from landfall. In this case, it is within the timeframe, but it is not well-established yet. If it does develop, then I will trust the models much more then.Stratosphere747 wrote:Extremeweatherguy wrote:models have shifted west it seems.
LOL..
Were you not the one that reminded a few folks yesterday to take these models with a grain of salt?
ok, thanks for that wxman. I thought this was the case, but based on past events this season (especially Chris and Ernesto) I didn't want to catch myself saying I believe any model solution before it becomes clear that the solution is likely. Since you say that path looks likely though, then I have no reason not to believe it anymore and will agree with your predicted scenario of an upper TX coast or SW LA landfall. [/i]wxman57 wrote:This is a somewhat different situation model-wise. It doesn't really matter if the system is well-established or not. Steering currents are very well-established. The disturbance (or storm) would track northward toward the upper TX coast then make a gradual NNE-NE curve, moving inland between the upper TX coast and the mid LA coast. Heaviest rain will move ashore east of the low pressure area.
yes, I think much of the TX coast and LA coast will get soaked, but based on what I have heard, the risk of the HEAVIEST rains is probably limited to an area between Houston and New Orleans with SW Louisiana probably being in the bullseye (though that is not set in stone just yet). I think it is possible that someone in that area gets 8"+ of rain during the next 36 hrs with widespread 1-3" amounts.fact789 wrote:i think the entire state of texas is gonna get soaked
Extremeweatherguy wrote:yes, I think much of the TX coast and LA coast will get soaked, but based on what I have heard, the risk of the HEAVIEST rains is probably limited to an area between Houston and New Orleans with SW Louisiana probably being in the bullseye (though that is not set in stone just yet). I think it is possible that someone in that area gets 8"+ of rain during the next 36 hrs with widespread 1-3" amounts.fact789 wrote:i think the entire state of texas is gonna get soaked
Users browsing this forum: cajungal, cycloneye, dl20415, MarioProtVI, Teban54 and 32 guests