Lindaloo wrote:Regit wrote:Lindaloo wrote:Regit wrote:When I was in school we had paddling for fighting. There was a fight about once a week.
By the 90's, paddling was still in place in the local schools. The local high school had over 200 fights in a 180-day school year. The school actually closed one day because of violence.
The next year, the district hired a principal who got rid of paddling and instituted a zero tolerance policy. If there was a fight, both teens were taken to the sheriff's department and dealt with there. That year there were two fights. During his four-year tenure there were seven.
Zero tolerance was not adopted for fighting. It was for guns and drugs. And furthermore, zero tolerance was not adopted overnight by a district. Principals do not have the power to say whether or not they will use zero tolerance.
wxman... innocent children get caught up in the zero tolerance all the time. Although you may not be one of the bad teens, they are out there.
LoL
He called his policy "zero tolerance." This was in or about 1993. And yes, a prinicpal can adopt policies and call them whatever he/she pleases.

Um no they cannot. They have to follow rules set in place by the superintendent and the school board. Does the principal write the student handbook? no. A principal can only recommend expulsion. The principal is not even in control of the curriculum.

Thanks for your input, drawing on your vast experience in the South Carolina Department of Education.
This principal was hired because of his kick ***, take names way of administrating. The first time he sent a student to jail, the board was not expecting it and it was actually on the 6:00 news as no student in the area had ever been arrested for a fight that didn't result in injury (as you can imagine, the parents were furious). While there are policies set forth by the board, a principal can put policies into place that do not violate the board's policy. Granted, this authority is given by the board, but it is some authority nonetheless.
But none of this has a thing to do with the topic.
Why not simply address the fact that this prinicpal did away with corporal punishment and cut violence in the school immediately by 99%?