North Korea Nuclear Standoff

Yarrah · #441 Postby **Yarrah** » Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:51 pm

The scenario doesn't really seem to mention that there's more then just the US. One of the many, many things that makes this scenario only a nice script for a low-budget action movie and nothing else.

#442 Postby **cycloneye** » Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:20 pm

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiap ... index.html

At least,they are talking so let's see if there is progress on the talks and North Korea turns around and dismantle it's nuclear program.In my opinion,it will not be easy talks with them but let's see how far they go.

#443 Postby **cycloneye** » Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:47 am

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16321972/

Talks hit a snag.Now let's see what will be the next move.

#444 Postby **cycloneye** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 7:45 am

North Korea Preparing for Test

:uarrow:

Here we go again with them possibly making another test of their nuclear arsenal.As we recall,the first test was a faliure.

#445 Postby **cycloneye** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:33 pm

U.S Warns North Korea

Let's see if this new possible nuke test by North Korea is a bluff or is for real.

#446 Postby **JonathanBelles** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:38 pm

when would the propsed test take place?

#447 Postby **cycloneye** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:44 pm

fact789 wrote:when would the propsed test take place?

It's unclear at this point if really they will do any test and when it may take place.The only thing that is a sure thing is as sattelite information shows,they are preparing the site in NE corner of North Korea for a possible test.

#448 Postby **JonathanBelles** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:46 pm

about the same place as last time?

Website · #449 Postby **Brent** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:48 pm

fact789 wrote:when would the propsed test take place?

The report I heard last night said 2-3 months before it happens.

#450 Postby **JonathanBelles** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:53 pm

Brent wrote:
fact789 wrote:when would the propsed test take place?

The report I heard last night said 2-3 months before it happens.

huh? before what happens?

#451 Postby **cycloneye** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:54 pm

fact789 wrote:about the same place as last time?

You answered your own question.

#452 Postby **JonathanBelles** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:54 pm

cycloneye wrote:
fact789 wrote:about the same place as last time?

You answered your own question.

ok lol

Derek Ortt · #453 Postby **Derek Ortt** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:16 pm

the efforts we ar eplacing on Iran should be applied to the source of the problem, which is NK.

Iran is the next level down on the chain as they have been getting much of their arms (which they have been then funneling to Hezbollah, though that did not work as well as Israel had to spank Hezbollah this summer).

If we were to take out Iran... Kim Jong Mentallyill can just then start selling to Chavez... and then we would have to go through the same thing we went through with Iran, except in our own hemisphere, which could allow us to be hit

#454 Postby **JonathanBelles** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:18 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Kim Jong Mentallyill

Website · #455 Postby **Brent** » Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:37 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:Kim Jong Mentallyill

#456 Postby **cycloneye** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:46 pm

North Korea and the U.S will Talk

:uarrow:

That is good that talks between North Korea and the U.S. start.I know that some here want the U.S. to crush North Korea,but let's see what if anything these talks go.

#457 Postby **JonathanBelles** » Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:50 pm

im unsure that this will solve anything.

#458 Postby **cycloneye** » Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:46 am

North Korea Wants Giant Rabbits to aliviate Food Shortage

:uarrow:

This news is not about nuclear tests or more tough talk from North Korea,or threats from the U.S to attack them,but about what they have to do to aliviate the enormous food shortage that they have in one of the most poorest countries of the world.All the money that the goverment uses is for the nuclear program and for the army and not to feed the population.

#459 Postby **cycloneye** » Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:48 am

Some Progress in Talks

:uarrow:

The question is if really the talks between the U.S. and NK will end with an agreement or is more buying time?

Cryomaniac · #460 Postby **Cryomaniac** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:36 am

cycloneye wrote:Some Progress in Talks

The question is if really the talks between the U.S. and NK will end with an agreement or is more buying time?

Seems like more buying time, like it was last time they said there was progress.

North Korea Nuclear Standoff

Who is online