We ARE really getting the winter storm with freezing drizzle, or do they not consider freezing drizzle to be a winter storm?

Moderator: S2k Moderators
JenBayles wrote:ETXHAMXYL wrote:Why are the NWS holding back?
I think we ALL would love to hear the answer to that question. I have to wonder just how much politics has to do with it. Mr. Mayor and County Commissioners don't want a panic on their hands, or have to pay OT to workers, or pay extra $$ for de-icing supplies? I really just don't get it.
Mattie wrote:Ok, is this typical or what . . . our winter storm watch has been cancelled and in its place they have put a freezing rain advisory - what does this mean for the lay person??
We ARE really getting the winter storm with freezing drizzle, or do they not consider freezing drizzle to be a winter storm?
ETXHAMXYL wrote:Just was reading a blog on WFAA weather site with Steve McCauley..he's the one who really blows things up too big at times, but this time I think he is finally right.
wxman57 wrote:JenBayles wrote:ETXHAMXYL wrote:Why are the NWS holding back?
I think we ALL would love to hear the answer to that question. I have to wonder just how much politics has to do with it. Mr. Mayor and County Commissioners don't want a panic on their hands, or have to pay OT to workers, or pay extra $$ for de-icing supplies? I really just don't get it.
I don't think it has anything to do with Mayors or County Commissioners or a public panic. It's likely a much more simple reason. Accountability. What's the incentive for a government worker to go against all the models with his/her own forecast? If the forecast is blown, he/she will have some explaining to do to the bosses but the public have very low expectations so no loss there. But if the forecaster agrees with the models and the forecast is blown it's the models' fault, not the fault of the forecaster.
The forecasters just aren't held accountable by the general public, their clients. In the private weather business we have to fight for every single client we get, and every dollar we make. It's not easy convincing some companies that they should pay for a service that the NWS provides for free. The only way to convince them is to outperform the NWS forecasts in times like this. By doing so, we can save our clients tens of thousands of dollars (or a lot more).
If we don't provide superior forecsats that save our clients money then they can fire us and go elsewhere. If enough clients follow the lead, then we're out of a job. That's a big incentive to do your very best and provide the earliest possible heads-up with an event like this.
JenBayles wrote:OK, Mario Gomez on KHOU just advertized the big Slow Down of the front just before hitting SE TX, and still no FROPA in Houston until Sunday night? Why the slow down? <blonde moment>
JenBayles wrote:OK, Mario Gomez on KHOU just advertized the big Slow Down of the front just before hitting SE TX, and still no FROPA in Houston until Sunday night? Why the slow down? <blonde moment>
Air Force Met wrote:OK...the front is through Waco. Looking back at the ETA extrapolated data...yesterday's 12/00z run had is passing through b/w 18 and 00z tomorrow. So, the front is 18 hours ahead of schedule on just a 24 hour cycle of the model run...
So...it's moving a lot faster and it is about 10 degrees colder than the ETA has forecasted. The GFS didn't have it coming through until 15/00Z...so the GFS is almost 48 hours too slow on this front in a 24 hours cycle of the model.
The 13/00Z run doesn't have it coming in until 12Z and the temps are already blown. So...the CURRENT run is already HOSED.
Will these NWS guys ever learn the lesson of shallow arctic air?
Air Force Met wrote:JenBayles wrote:OK, Mario Gomez on KHOU just advertized the big Slow Down of the front just before hitting SE TX, and still no FROPA in Houston until Sunday night? Why the slow down? <blonde moment>
Because Mario is having a hard time reconciling what he is observing (fast frontal movement) and what the models are saying (slow frontal movement) with what the NWS is saying (we're not sure)...
Why? Because he's making the same critical error that the NWS is making and forgetting that this is shallow arctic air.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests