http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 33&start=0
Thread #9 above.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
southerngale wrote:While I understand what wall_cloud said and it makes sense, it's hard to believe they'd have numbers this high and even going up on Sunday. I know they have plenty of time to change the forecast, I'm just saying that even if they do drop them by quite a bit, I don't think it's going to be anything bone-chilling, colder than we've seen in many years.
Furious George wrote:http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/loop.ecmwf850t.html
Notice the 12Z ECMWF still has the unbelievably cold air just north of the US border, but it no longer wants to drive it far south (or at least by next weekend). If this holds true, I would not be surprised to see seasonable weather next weekend.
double D wrote:Furious George wrote:http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/loop.ecmwf850t.html
Notice the 12Z ECMWF still has the unbelievably cold air just north of the US border, but it no longer wants to drive it far south (or at least by next weekend). If this holds true, I would not be surprised to see seasonable weather next weekend.
It also look like the cold air that does make into the US gets quickly shunted to the east. I wonder if the models are on to something as the GFS shows something similar to the EURO. Also the 500mb flow doesn't look as impressive as it did a couple of days ago. I would not be surprised at all if next weekend ends up being sunny and cool/mild, but not cold. Just my 2 cents, which may not even be worth that much.
aggiecutter wrote:All the models will have trouble bringing an air mass of that intensity very south because the physics of the model says that's not supposed to happen. If, and I am speaking in the subjunctive, this follows what happened in 83 and 89, and this looks like where it is heading, then chunks of the air mass will break off and come down. There will be 3 or 4 of them and then the motherload will break loose and nothing will stop it.
aggiecutter wrote:All the models will have trouble bringing an air mass of that intensity very south because the physics of the model says that's not supposed to happen. If, and I am speaking in the subjunctive, this follows what happened in 83 and 89, and this looks like where it is heading, then chunks of the air mass will break off and come down. There will be 3 or 4 of them and then the motherload will break loose and nothing will stop it. In the interim, while everyone is wondering when and where the brunt of the cold will go, these feeder shots will be more than cold enough to produce snow and ice in the southern plains and Texas. That will probably be the big story mid-week as everyone keeps their eyes on what is happening in Canada. In December of 83, a 20% chance of snow showers turned into 8 inches of snow in Texarkana.This occurred with one of the feeder shots before the main cold came.
GeneratorPower wrote:wall_cloud, are you saying this air is shallow?
aggiecutter wrote:All the models will have trouble bringing an air mass of that intensity very south because the physics of the model says that's not supposed to happen. If, and I am speaking in the subjunctive, this follows what happened in 83 and 89, and this looks like where it is heading, then chunks of the air mass will break off and come down. There will be 3 or 4 of them and then the motherload will break loose and nothing will stop it. In the interim, while everyone is wondering when and where the brunt of the cold will go, these feeder shots will be more than cold enough to produce snow and ice in the southern plains and Texas. That will probably be the big story mid-week as everyone keeps their eyes on what is happening in Canada. In December of 83, a 20% chance of snow showers turned into 8 inches of snow in Texarkana.This occurred with one of the feeder shots before the main cold came.
Air Force Met wrote:aggiecutter wrote:All the models will have trouble bringing an air mass of that intensity very south because the physics of the model says that's not supposed to happen. If, and I am speaking in the subjunctive, this follows what happened in 83 and 89, and this looks like where it is heading, then chunks of the air mass will break off and come down. There will be 3 or 4 of them and then the motherload will break loose and nothing will stop it. In the interim, while everyone is wondering when and where the brunt of the cold will go, these feeder shots will be more than cold enough to produce snow and ice in the southern plains and Texas. That will probably be the big story mid-week as everyone keeps their eyes on what is happening in Canada. In December of 83, a 20% chance of snow showers turned into 8 inches of snow in Texarkana.This occurred with one of the feeder shots before the main cold came.
There is a big difference b/w 1983/1989 and now. The air was a LOT colder in those years compared to nw...and those years had huge arctic highs. That is what is missing. Right now...there is a 1035 high moving down western Canada...but right now...that's it. There is some cold air sitting up near the pole...-30's and -40s...and that is what the Euro is wrapping into the polar vortex. But...short of a monster high to bring it due south...it is the kind of cold that we get some of...but the bulk of goes into the plains and then east. The air will get brought south form it's source...but it's not all that cold considering where it's coming from. -40 for the north pole in January ain't that cold...and Texas is not known for receiving arctic outbreaks from the north pole. We can get good cold snaps from that source region...but the classic don't come from there...not for us....especially when there isn't a mega-high attached.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests