Remnants of Andrea-Thread 3

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

Remnants of Andrea-Thread 3

#1 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat May 12, 2007 9:04 pm

Thread 2 has reached 25 pages.

Thread 1: :rarrow: :rarrow: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 67&start=0
Thread 2: :rarrow: :rarrow: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 14&start=0

Here is the link to the prior two Andrea Threads. :uarrow: :uarrow:
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#2 Postby curtadams » Sat May 12, 2007 9:15 pm

fact789 wrote:QuikScat has a 25kt barb now on the Decending pass with a few yellow barbs (20kts)
I dont know too much about QuikScat but does not show the 25kt barb on the Ascending pass.

What is the difference between the two passes? Altitude? Latitude?


If you're getting them from the same place I am there's something wrong with the data. The 01:42Z pass is *exactly* the same as the 19:12Z pass - down to the last barb. Looking at the NHC sat pages, the low is placed where that quickscat pass put it - when the low cloud motion has obviously been tracking the convection, which is moving briskly to the east. Is the current NHC analysis based on a bogus quickscat pass?
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#3 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat May 12, 2007 9:19 pm

0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

#4 Postby cpdaman » Sat May 12, 2007 9:20 pm

fact 789 can u give me a link to the quikscat pass you found (edit u just posted it)

because if i am not mistaken the lastest one i can find MAY 13 1:42 utc is actually data from MAY 11 around 1142 pm
i.e last nite around midnite u can see at the bottom the time -22 hours in addition to the correltation from UTC time to EST

the circulation on the "may 13 1:42 utc is located around 28.5 78.7
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#5 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat May 12, 2007 9:22 pm

look at my last post.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#6 Postby curtadams » Sat May 12, 2007 9:23 pm

Yep, same place. If you look on the ocean page you get a different picture, although it's not possible to make out details due to scale. But it's obviously very different from the storm pass. The descending storm pass is entirely blank. Must be a software bug.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

#7 Postby cpdaman » Sat May 12, 2007 9:24 pm

read my post at the bottom of the quikscat it says it is from a position 22 hours ago plus the hours to go from utc to EST (look under "3) data buffer is may 13 1:42 utc 2007 -22 hours"

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/sto ... _at_0.html
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#8 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat May 12, 2007 9:28 pm

The system still appears to have a close LLC near or under the convection. We will see, but if it was not upgraded this morning. I really really don't like its chances of being upgraded now.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#9 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat May 12, 2007 9:28 pm

So if I am reading you correctly that information is old?
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#10 Postby senorpepr » Sat May 12, 2007 9:29 pm

fact789 wrote:QuikScat has a 25kt barb now on the Decending pass with a few yellow barbs (20kts)
I dont know too much about QuikScat but does not show the 25kt barb on the Ascending pass.

What is the difference between the two passes? Altitude? Latitude?


QuikScat is part of a polar-orbiting satellite. Instead of like GOES, where they remain positioned over one location, these satellite orbit the earth from pole to pole. The ascending pass is when the satellite goes from the South Pole to North Pole on the daylight side of the Earth. Then it becomes a descending pass, going from the North Pole to South Pole on the nighttime side of the Earth.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#11 Postby curtadams » Sat May 12, 2007 9:32 pm

*All* the pics have the "-22 hours", so it doesn't mean anything. Does anybody know what it's *supposed* to mean?

Going through the "previous wind vector" page, they are all coming in sets with identical data but varying timestamps. I though the stamp at top was supposed to give page creation time and the one at the bottom was supposed to give data origin time (the real time, as far as we're concerned). It's not working that way: everything is page creation. I don't see anything that gives the real data time.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#12 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat May 12, 2007 9:33 pm

Senorpepr: Ok. That makes it very clear. Everyone: Im sorry for the QuikScat scuttle. Im trying to learn.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#13 Postby curtadams » Sat May 12, 2007 9:47 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:The system still appears to have a close LLC near or under the convection. We will see, but if it was not upgraded this morning. I really really don't like its chances of being upgraded now.

Don't be so sure. I think the NHC is using the quickscat passes to place the LLCs and isn't aware something is wrong with the timestamps. Franklin's comment that the convection is E of the LLC is very odd because both shortwave and the oceanic quickscat show it's very close. If the NHC has been using old quickscat data - without being aware it's old because of the timestamps - then all their analyses are showing the LLC very remote from the obvious MLC/ULC and of course they haven't upgraded. That's not because they'd disagree with our assessments of what we're seeing, but because they're using mistimestamped data.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#14 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Sat May 12, 2007 9:55 pm

This thing will not give up. More convection is near the center. NHC might just upgrade it tmorrow if she remains like that.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#15 Postby Chacor » Sat May 12, 2007 9:56 pm

040
WHXX01 KWBC 130048
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
0048 UTC SUN MAY 13 2007

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.

ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

DISTURBANCE ANDREA (AL012007) 20070513 0000 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
070513 0000 070513 1200 070514 0000 070514 1200

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 29.6N 77.0W 30.3N 75.2W 30.5N 71.6W 30.0N 68.0W
BAMD 29.6N 77.0W 31.0N 74.5W 32.4N 69.1W 34.3N 61.3W
BAMM 29.6N 77.0W 30.5N 74.8W 31.2N 70.4W 31.7N 64.3W
LBAR 29.6N 77.0W 30.8N 74.4W 32.4N 70.1W 34.4N 64.2W
SHIP 25KTS 31KTS 40KTS 46KTS
DSHP 25KTS 31KTS 40KTS 46KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
070515 0000 070516 0000 070517 0000 070518 0000

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 29.7N 63.3W 28.0N 55.7W 27.2N 54.8W 28.0N 56.4W
BAMD 38.2N 53.5W 46.7N 45.9W 54.5N 34.2W 58.7N 10.6W
BAMM 33.1N 56.1W 41.8N 42.5W 50.0N 36.9W 57.5N 26.9W
LBAR 36.6N 57.2W 41.5N 47.1W .0N .0W .0N .0W
SHIP 48KTS 41KTS 27KTS 0KTS
DSHP 48KTS 41KTS 27KTS 0KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 29.6N LONCUR = 77.0W DIRCUR = 70DEG SPDCUR = 7KT
LATM12 = 29.1N LONM12 = 78.5W DIRM12 = 49DEG SPDM12 = 5KT
LATM24 = 28.5N LONM24 = 79.1W
WNDCUR = 25KT RMAXWD = 25NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1006MB OUTPRS = 1013MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM

$$
NNNN
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#16 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat May 12, 2007 10:02 pm

Its being kicked out now, the LLC is on the western side of the convection, but expect some strengthing over the next 6 hours before it makes cooler water.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#17 Postby curtadams » Sat May 12, 2007 10:12 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Its being kicked out now, the LLC is on the western side of the convection, but expect some strengthing over the next 6 hours before it makes cooler water.
How can you tell? I can't identify an LLC even on shortwave. Some arcs to the S look like the LLC is under the cloud cover, but it's hard to be sure.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#18 Postby brunota2003 » Sat May 12, 2007 10:22 pm

Yea, I dont see anything that resembles a LLC...I see a small ball of convection, and that is it...
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#19 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat May 12, 2007 10:31 pm

Near 29.8 north/76.5 or so west. Give or take. A broad MLC and possibly LLC. Nice convection trying to form over it. Look at the satellite which is placed over the Gulf.

I just got down going through the 22 page Isacc page. This storm has gotten way more discussion then it ever did. Heck for most of Andrea life it has looked better to, Isaac for a short time was a a hurricane, yes, but this sysem is just interesting.

http://www1.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/rms ... PICAL.html
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#20 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat May 12, 2007 10:36 pm

Also you see a upper low coming over southern Florida,,,Which is whats kicking this storm out to sea.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cpv17, EgmontBeachBum, Google Adsense [Bot], Ivanhater, Kazmit, KeysRedWine, Killjoy12, Lizzytiz1, redingtonbeach, RomP, Teban54 and 109 guests