DanKellFla wrote:50 posts about an interesting topic, and I have to be the one to kill the thread.

Hahaha... I don't think you killed it? Just tucked it in for a little nap.

J/K
Actually, I agree with all your comments. Though I personally would never
completely rule out the "possibility" that a high-rise could collapse from a "worst-case" wind load scenario alone, I think the probablity of that happening is extremely slight... and would likely take a very complex set of circumstances. And like you said, even if the building doesn't collapse, the resulting interior damage from walls, windows and doors failing would be tremendous in and of itself (i.e. the Burger King World Headquarters after Andrew)
That said, in a hypothetical "worst case" hurricane scenario for downtown Miami, I also agree with the pemise that other types of damage may occur which could potentially augment and/or expedite a catastrophic failure of a high-rise... i.e. If one (or potentially multiple) of the massive construction cranes that are currently everywhere throughout the downtown area were to collapse and strike a nearby building, I can only assume that an impact (or impacts) of that magnitude could be enough to weaken load-bearing elements of the structure to the point that, when combined with the extreme wind loads, the building (or a good portion of it) might fail. That collapse could then potentially lead to other catastrophic failures in nearby buildings.
In addition, aside from the wind-load... some of the Miami area high-rises have other factors to contend with. I remember a documentary on Channel 10 back in 1979 interviewing Neil Frank, Herb Saffir and others about a catastrophic hurricane scenario in Miami (almost prophetic when David approached later that summer) and, at that time, they were very concerned about several condos that had been constructed on "compressed sand" pilings, adjacent to the beach, on Key Biscayne. If I remember correctly, they were concerned that significant erosion would occur, allowing the "compressed sand" to be exposed and also eroded, ultimately allowing the building to be undermined and collapse. I don't remember the specific development that they used as a case study... and I guess it's possible that the buildings have since been retrofitted (though I doubt it), but I suspect this type of scenario would potentially produce a greater risk for seeing large buildings collapse, than from wind loads alone.
Actually a lot of the discussion I've seen for "worst-case scenarios", in threads and in the media, tend to deal with a single city being impacted... i.e. It Could Happen Tomorrow: A Category Five Striking <<fill in your city here>>. My personal opinion is that thinking of a single city as a "worst-case" scenario is too narrow in potential scope... the worst-case scenario for South Florida wouldn't actually be a direct strike on any one particular city, but on several. Like what would happen with a relatively slow-moving, annular, category five, with a huge inner core and windfield... (something like Isabel at it's peak)... taking a track like Cleo in 1964... coming onshore over downtown Miami, moving north-northwest, almost paralleling the Florida east coast with enough of the inner core remaining over water to slow the weakening process, while both sides of the eyewall rake Miami, Miami Beach, Ft.Lauderdale, Boca, Delray, West Palm and everything in between... during multiple tidal cycles... with the western eyewall moving directly over Lake Okeechobee (assuming there's any water left in it after this summer). The results would be unimaginable.
-=Michael=-http://www.tropmet.com