#55 Postby wjs3 » Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:51 am
...Like any other model guidance, there can (will) always be errors. Think big picture and pattern rather than the specifics any time, including shear, I say. Like any other model variable, shear is estimated by looking at a number of characteristics of the atmosphere over a number of different altitudes/heights. The chance for errors increases over time.
Add to that that there are not a lot of surface/upper air obs to "inform" the models over a lot of the area we are looking at--and you can see that these things have to be taken with a grain of salt. Things can be really poorly initialized just because of the lack of obs.
That being said, I looked at it really quickly, but I thought there was generally a "consistent" look to PSU ewall models in increasing shear a bit in a few days. (I caveat that by saying there are of course other models out there, and I haven't checked them out)
But that could totally change. I'm not as experienced as Wxman57, so I don't come down quite as strongly on a forecast as he does. Someday, maybe.
...also, welcome to the board, canecharmer. As cpdaman noted, there is no reliable way to tell whether there will even BE a system by the time it gets that far west, let alone what the path, if any, will be. I assume you have watched the tropics for a while? Think about how many times you've seen track errors on well-developed systems near the coast. Now, in this case, there's not even really a "system" for the models to get a hold of and give us any kind of estimate on!
WJS3
0 likes