Invest 96L East of Windwards,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derek Ortt

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#121 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:34 am

a system can go directly from the tropical wave phase to the TS phase if a closed circulation does not form until winds are of TS force. Happens quite frequently
0 likes   

Windsurfer_NYC
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 233
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:27 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Re:

#122 Postby Windsurfer_NYC » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:35 am

wxman57 wrote:See the lower left panel of this ECMWF tropical loop:

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMW ... floop.html


I think we need to use the URL button to put in working links with this new system...

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ECMWF_0z/ecmwfloop.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#123 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:37 am

For those that might have missed it, the quickscat pass shows a low level circulation, albeit small.

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur/zooms/WMBas26.png

So, even though it is not impressive, it does look like a closed low. Now, onto the highly subjective question... how much more organization would need to occur before this is considered a TD?
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#124 Postby Cyclone1 » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:40 am

Emmett_Brown wrote:For those that might have missed it, the quickscat pass shows a low level circulation, albeit small.

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur/zooms/WMBas26.png

So, even though it is not impressive, it does look like a closed low. Now, onto the highly subjective question... how much more organization would need to occur before this is considered a TD?

If it's got a closed sfc low, shouldn't it be one already? :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
punkyg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: sanford florida

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#125 Postby punkyg » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:43 am

Cyclone1 wrote:
Emmett_Brown wrote:For those that might have missed it, the quickscat pass shows a low level circulation, albeit small.

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur/zooms/WMBas26.png

So, even though it is not impressive, it does look like a closed low. Now, onto the highly subjective question... how much more organization would need to occur before this is considered a TD?

If it's got a closed sfc low, shouldn't it be one already? :eek:
I say it should,
but they want it to look better before they upgrade it. man i like saying upgrade
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#126 Postby 'CaneFreak » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:45 am

Cyclone1 wrote:
Emmett_Brown wrote:For those that might have missed it, the quickscat pass shows a low level circulation, albeit small.

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur/zooms/WMBas26.png

So, even though it is not impressive, it does look like a closed low. Now, onto the highly subjective question... how much more organization would need to occur before this is considered a TD?

If it's got a closed sfc low, shouldn't it be one already? :eek:


Needs more inflow I would say...looks rather grotesque right now...convection seems to be on the decrease as well...possibly due to the dry surrounding air and a diurnal minimum? T numbers were in the 1.5 range...there must only be a couple more factors that need to be present before we classify it..I think in general t numbers need to be in the 2.5 range generally before a system is classified...so....structurally, its almost there...
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngreen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 2:11 am
Location: Thonotosassa, FL & Old Fort, TN

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#127 Postby southerngreen » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:53 am

Derek Ortt wrote:a system can go directly from the tropical wave phase to the TS phase if a closed circulation does not form until winds are of TS force. Happens quite frequently


i can't remember the stats on opal (oct 95?) but i went to work in the morning and there was mild interest near the yucatan and by the next day we had the real thing - sometimes they seem to skip stages entirely
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#128 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:54 am

'CaneFreak wrote:
Cyclone1 wrote:
Emmett_Brown wrote:For those that might have missed it, the quickscat pass shows a low level circulation, albeit small.

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur/zooms/WMBas26.png

So, even though it is not impressive, it does look like a closed low. Now, onto the highly subjective question... how much more organization would need to occur before this is considered a TD?

If it's got a closed sfc low, shouldn't it be one already? :eek:


Needs more inflow I would say...looks rather grotesque right now...convection seems to be on the decrease as well...possibly due to the dry surrounding air and a diurnal minimum? T numbers were in the 1.5 range...there must only be a couple more factors that need to be present before we classify it..I think in general t numbers need to be in the 2.5 range generally before a system is classified...so....structurally, its almost there...


Thanks. 2.5 T numbers then... I always wondered about that. I have seen some pretty lame looking lows upgraded in the past, but they were usually closer to home.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22997
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#129 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:55 am

Cyclone1 wrote:
Emmett_Brown wrote:For those that might have missed it, the quickscat pass shows a low level circulation, albeit small.

http://manati.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/dataimages21/cur/zooms/WMBas26.png

So, even though it is not impressive, it does look like a closed low. Now, onto the highly subjective question... how much more organization would need to occur before this is considered a TD?

If it's got a closed sfc low, shouldn't it be one already? :eek:


I believe that those QuikSCAT winds indicate the possibility of a surface circulation, but they're detecting winds above the surface (cloud movements). Even if the disturbance has/had an LLC, it's general lack of organization is not good enough for the NHC to classify it, particularly since it's well out to sea and no threat to anyone for at least 5-6 days. So even though a disturbance might have an LLC, the NHC forecasters have demonstrated that they won't classify a disturbance out in the "middle of nowhere" as a TD unless it is showing definite signs of an LLC and is increasing in organization (and, i might add, that conditions in its path are forecast to be favorable for development).

So all we have now is a disturbance that might have an LLC. But thunderstorms have diminished in the past 2-3 hours, and conditions aloft in its path are forecast to be increasingly unfavorable for development. In this case, the NHC will most likely just watch it today and tomorrow for some significant signs of organization before jumping the gun and calling it a TD. There's no rush, it's not going to affect anyone soon.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6110
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#130 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:56 am

Well I just watched the weather channel for a minute and the person who was on the tropical update said that it could be upgraded at any time...im not sure Id go that far, but i think its still possible
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#131 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:58 am

Emmett_Brown wrote:
'CaneFreak wrote:Needs more inflow I would say...looks rather grotesque right now...convection seems to be on the decrease as well...possibly due to the dry surrounding air and a diurnal minimum? T numbers were in the 1.5 range...there must only be a couple more factors that need to be present before we classify it..I think in general t numbers need to be in the 2.5 range generally before a system is classified...so....structurally, its almost there...


Thanks. 2.5 T numbers then... I always wondered about that. I have seen some pretty lame looking lows upgraded in the past, but they were usually closer to home.


T2.5 is actually tropical storm strength classification...
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#132 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:59 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:Well I just watched the weather channel for a minute and the person who was on the tropical update said that it could be upgraded at any time...im not sure Id go that far, but i think its still possible


Image

Not really likely in the next 6-12 hours or so unless something changes big-time, I'd say.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#133 Postby Cyclone1 » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:01 am

Yeah, I'd say nothing in the next 6 hours, but maybe tonight. Doesn't look that bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#134 Postby 'CaneFreak » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:08 am

Chacor wrote:
Emmett_Brown wrote:
'CaneFreak wrote:Needs more inflow I would say...looks rather grotesque right now...convection seems to be on the decrease as well...possibly due to the dry surrounding air and a diurnal minimum? T numbers were in the 1.5 range...there must only be a couple more factors that need to be present before we classify it..I think in general t numbers need to be in the 2.5 range generally before a system is classified...so....structurally, its almost there...


Thanks. 2.5 T numbers then... I always wondered about that. I have seen some pretty lame looking lows upgraded in the past, but they were usually closer to home.


T2.5 is actually tropical storm strength classification...


true...T 2.0 is good enough then....sorry...
0 likes   

TPACane07
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:59 am

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#135 Postby TPACane07 » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:09 am

in the "for what it's worth" department, Dennis (2005) formed on 7/4/05, at 12.5/63.1 (we all know how he turned out)

dennis was born further west, but roughly a comparable latitude. (10ish vs 12.5)

I will be watching CMC model with some interest, as it has been fairly on point so far with the two named storms. Latest run I saw (0Z) showed some reflection heading into East Caribbean...but of course, way too early to hang your hat on anything.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#136 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:10 am

Just to remind everyone the criteria for a TCFA...
http://www.nlmoc.navy.mil/trg/tropical/TCFA_Checklist.htm

Also, that link has this note:
"* In most situations, (ie, organized convection for at least 12 hrs, >25 kt sfc wind detected), NHC will go directly to advisory issuance!"
Last edited by Chacor on Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#137 Postby Chacor » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:15 am

Image
Last edited by Chacor on Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

Re: Invest 96L Central Atlantic,Sat Pics,Analysis and Models

#138 Postby Derecho » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:16 am

Actually for unreconned African T-waves T 1.5 for an extended period of time, or any T 2.0, seems to typically be where TD advisories start.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#139 Postby JonathanBelles » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:24 am

It looks good from first glance, low shear, high water temps. good circulation.
0 likes   

User avatar
WmE
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 696
Age: 36
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

Re:

#140 Postby WmE » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:36 am

fact789 wrote:It looks good from first glance, low shear, high water temps. good circulation.


Not to be forgotten the dry air!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests