#112 Postby Frank2 » Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:32 am
This never made into the local newspaper, so, thought I'd share it here, especially since the public seems to continue to jump on the "Good for him - he was interested in the public having a new satellite - the spoiled staff shouldn't have forced him out" way of thinking...
Dear Editor:
It seems that public opinion of the NHC's staff members' actions are being misinterpreted, not by any fault of their own, but, because the public are making critical comments based solely on information that has been made available to them - the reality is that the well-known "dying satellite" issue was apparently the final straw, for those who decided to insist on the former Director's removal.
When I worked at the NHC, we also had satellite problems (one in particular, that lasted off and on for quite some time), but, unlike the just-ended situation, we always were in agreement with the Director's manner of dealing with the situation, since past Directors, although making it understood that they were the person in charge, were also pro-actively involved on a more personal level, when it came to their employee's individual contributions to the mission of the organization as a whole.
However, as told by the staff last week, it seems that the Mr. Proenza did not handle the satellite issue [something previously known to the forecasting staff], or other "in-house" matters, with the staff in mind, but, was moving forward as a single entity - autonomy is not a leadership quality.
Similar to a coach, in order for any group of individuals to be successful, the person in charge must also be humble enough to also take into account the opinions - and experience - of those on his staff.
What is also not known to the public is the fact that a unique employer, such as the National Hurricane Center, is not only a job, in the monetary or career sense, but, is a way of life - those in professional sports, commercial fishing or agriculture would probably understand this better, and, would understand that it is very important for co-workers to have a level of trust among each other that is similar to the trust of family or friends.
Unfortunately, this did not seem to be the case with the recently-departed Director, and, while I'm always sorry to see someone forceably removed from their position, the outcome, as his superiors decided, seems to have been the correct decision in this case.
0 likes