jschlitz wrote:I would hardly say that pro mets claiming their superiority, etc., runs "rampant" on this board. For the most part, the pro mets here are incredibly patient, understanding, and forthcoming with knowledge that most amateurs simply do not have. Sometimes painstakingly so. And for the most part, a professional, degreed meteorologist will understand intricacies of the weather at a level of detail that most of us cannot touch. They do indeed deserve a level of professional respect and most of the time when a regular "Joe Blow" tries to discredit a pro met he's just crying sour grapes.
Yes, there may be one or two people I can think of that just b/c they have a Met degree and have completed X number of research hours it has gone to his/her head a bit, may even sound condescending at times, but that is quite the minority. For every pro met like that there may be 20 amateurs that do this - without the credentials to even back it up, so I think singling-out the pro mets is a bit unfair.
Almost all of the pro mets here dedicate countless hours - in their spare time, no less - posting invaluable information for us to consume, and FOR FREE. I'm a degreed professional in my field and believe me, I don't sit-up late at night dispensing free information on message boards. What our pro mets contribute is completely selfless and I believe almost every member on this board is incredibly grateful for this.
Believe me, it's much better here than some of the other forums out there. If you want to see what some real pompous mets have to say, then look elsewhere, but for the most part you won't find that on S2K. Let's keep things in perspective, please. Our pro mets are first rate and S2K wouldn't be what it is without them. My $.02.
excellent post and totally agree