99L Recon Discussion Thread

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#41 Postby MWatkins » Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:59 pm

If that 1002.7 pressure is valid...and there is a center down there...the system is doomed anyway. There is nothing around 10.8 57.5 to maintain the system...the significant weather is well to the north and west of there.

MW
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22991
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#42 Postby wxman57 » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:15 pm

Chacor wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Plane is reporting calm surface winds over a large area near 11N/58W with pressures 1010mb. Don't think there was a 1002.7mb pressure observed. Wasn't reported in regular recon reports, anyway. Lowest I've seen is 1009mb near Barbados. No westerly surface winds reported yet, either. Looks like a moderate wave to me. But forecasting what the NHC will do is harder than forecasting hurricanes by far. ;-)


There was one W report... only one missing is NW I believe.


Haven't seen a west surface wind reported. Which observation was it? I've been on a plane flying back from New Orleans over the last few hours and only had my BlackBerry to look at. I'm in the office now.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#43 Postby KWT » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:17 pm

I believe this was the one, not quite exactly due west but close:

174330 1139N 05808W 9771 00289 0100 +220 +220 265005 006 025 016 00
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#44 Postby SouthFloridawx » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:23 pm

Could you post the most significant winds and pressures on that graphic?

Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Image
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5077
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#45 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:27 pm

That is a screenshot from the output of my decoder. I'll write over the screenshot next time.

Here is where the lowest pressure was measured:
Image
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#46 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:43 pm

We now have winds from due north.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22991
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#47 Postby wxman57 » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:50 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:We now have winds from due north.


Recon reports the north wind at 15kts as "convection induced"
0 likes   

User avatar
Downdraft
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:45 pm
Location: Sanford, Florida
Contact:

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#48 Postby Downdraft » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:52 pm

can someone send me a pm on how to post a pic or graphic on the board? thanks.
0 likes   

StormScanWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:53 pm

#49 Postby StormScanWx » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:53 pm

When will the next recon mission to investigate be after the current ongoing one?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#50 Postby RL3AO » Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:57 pm

StormScanWx wrote:When will the next recon mission to investigate be after the current ongoing one?


12 hour fixes I think.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38106
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#51 Postby Brent » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:01 pm

Looks like tomorrow at Noon:

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (CARIBBEAN)
FLIGHT ONE
A. 02/1600Z
B. AFXXX 02DDA INVEST
C. 02/1400Z
D. 14.0N 65.5W
E. 02/1500Z TO 02/2000Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY DAY OUTLOOK: BEGIN 12-HRLY FIXES
AT 03/1200Z IF SYSTEM DEVELOPS.
3. REMARKS: THIS MISSION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR 02/1200Z
HAS BEEN SLIPPED TO 02/1600Z.
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5077
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#52 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:44 pm

Well I thought my decoder broke. Must have been the plane with the error. Reported an extraploated surface pressure of 987.5 mb.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#53 Postby WindRunner » Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:17 pm

Brent wrote:Looks like tomorrow at Noon:

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (CARIBBEAN)
FLIGHT ONE
A. 02/1600Z
B. AFXXX 02DDA INVEST
C. 02/1400Z
D. 14.0N 65.5W
E. 02/1500Z TO 02/2000Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY DAY OUTLOOK: BEGIN 12-HRLY FIXES
AT 03/1200Z IF SYSTEM DEVELOPS.
3. REMARKS: THIS MISSION ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR 02/1200Z
HAS BEEN SLIPPED TO 02/1600Z.


Flight should have first fix at noon . . . section A is the first fix time, with section C being the takeoff time and E being the on-site (in storm) time . . .
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#54 Postby WindRunner » Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:23 pm

Also, if I may, the recon never "observed" any pressures . . . with the new HDOBs, the pressure group is extrapolated . . . hence when the geopotential heights fly up or down, the extrapolation varies wildly. There is no large area of 1020-something pressure, or a 1031 high on the south side of the storm . . . and there is no 1002 part of the storm either. The reccos seemed reasonably accurate . . . with lowest pressure reported there being 1006mb.

Personally, I'd put it at 1007mb right now, from the data I saw earlier. Was watching it in the office, and that was the lowest it got while in the convection (I believe the 1002.7 reading was near one of the corners).


Oh, and sorry I haven't been doing graphics. Since they're using the new (and computer-friendly) format, I think a GE plotter will be much easier to write. It probably won't be ready for tomorrow's mission, but I'll work on it some tonight and see what happens . . .
0 likes   

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5077
Age: 42
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

#55 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:33 pm

I didn't realize the extrapolations could be so off sometimes. I'll have to remember that.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re:

#56 Postby WindRunner » Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:39 pm

Chris_in_Tampa wrote:I didn't realize the extrapolations could be so off sometimes. I'll have to remember that.


When they are done by actual people, they are usually quite accurate . . . i.e. vortex fixes and the recco obs. The hdob sets are automated by computer . . . which probably grabs the geopotential group and the plane's pressure (the pressure level that the plane is flying at) and makes a guess. Hence, when the reported geopotential level rises without the plane's pressure rising, the extrapolated pressure will rise as well. You'll note that the geopotential at the 1030 extrapolations had geopotential level reports of just over 400m . . . for a 977mb level in the tropics, that'd be quite high, and therefore the plane thinks it's a good bit higher up and therefore inflates the surface pressure to a level that is actually beneath sea level.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#57 Postby SouthFloridawx » Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:53 am

Bump...
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34006
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#58 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:53 am

It should leave in a little over an hour? or does it arrive at the system then?
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#59 Postby Aquawind » Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:54 am

Ohh Goodie... FACTS.... Well the best we can get... 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: 99L Recon Discussion Thread

#60 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:08 am

take off!!...dont get your hopes up...I doubt they find anything..but its trying
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests