Invest 99L Thread #6

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#461 Postby skysummit » Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:34 am

Yea....regarding my theory....remember, the chances of this happening or low to NIL, but since there's really nothing else to talk about, I'd like to hear a pro met's thoughts on it. Don't just shut it down simply because it likely won't happen....try to keep an open mind :)
0 likes   

User avatar
punkyg
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: sanford florida

#462 Postby punkyg » Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:46 am

Hey where did my post go?
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re:

#463 Postby vaffie » Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:55 am

skysummit wrote:Yea....regarding my theory....remember, the chances of this happening or low to NIL, but since there's really nothing else to talk about, I'd like to hear a pro met's thoughts on it. Don't just shut it down simply because it likely won't happen....try to keep an open mind :)


I'm not a pro, but in my 15 years of watching storms develop, I've seen the scenario you painted countless times. We'll just have to wait and see. The models take it in the general direction of the Yucatan already, so reformation to the north would simply take it through the channel--a bad scenario if you're worried about development.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#464 Postby tailgater » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:01 pm

Emmett_Brown wrote:
philnyc wrote:
tailgater wrote:I have a question for those more knowlegdeable than myself. Is mid level energy just as likely to react to diurnal Max's and Min's as low-level energy?


When the diurnal max comes after dark, the reason you get stronger convection (tstorms) is that the cloud tops of whatever showers and thunderstorms are there radiate energy out into space and thus cool down. Cooler temperatures at the tops of these clouds increases the temperature difference between the warm sea surface and the tops of the clouds. This steeper temperature diference causes the air to rise higher and faster, i.e. the thunderstorms grow in size. It's a positive feedback loop that goes on until the sun comes back out.
So given that, all energy levels from low to mid to upper are affected in the sense that they all see a kinetic energy increase due to air rising higher and faster within the disturbance. If by lower levels you mean the surface, even there we must see an energy increase, since the surface air gets drawn in faster as the divergence increases at the top levels.


I'm a mad scientist, (not officially a meterologist), but that was a great explanation of diurnal convection. This is the same reason that thunderstorms break out during the day over land. Does anyone know what height in the atmosphere this "cooling" takes place at so as to trigger nighttime convection? Also, does anyone have maps that chart this type of instability (difference in temp between lower and upper levels)... is this the same as the lifted index?

Another comment: Perhaps this a contributing factor for why tropical activity picks up in Autumn... peak water temps from a season of heating, with an upper atmosphere that is colder because nights grow longer, hence more convection, and in turn more cyclones.


Thanks for your insight Phil, good stuff, but I guess I didn't explain myself very well. If there is no energy at the surface will this heat transfer still take place. The reason I ask is because IMHO(uneducated weather nerd) I didn't think that 99l ever had much at the surface, yet it was greatly effected by the diurnal Max each evening or was that happenstance, maybe cloud deck keeping the surface cooler until the sun broke through?
Just trying to learn something, please excuse all the grammer errors.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#465 Postby Sanibel » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:05 pm

I think the wave is already being drawn towards the trough over the GOM. It still has that red ir attached to it.
0 likes   

philnyc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, New York City, New York
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#466 Postby philnyc » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:08 pm

I'm a mad scientist, (not officially a meterologist), but that was a great explanation of diurnal convection. This is the same reason that thunderstorms break out during the day over land. Does anyone know what height in the atmosphere this "cooling" takes place at so as to trigger nighttime convection? Also, does anyone have maps that chart this type of instability (difference in temp between lower and upper levels)... is this the same as the lifted index?

Another comment: Perhaps this a contributing factor for why tropical activity picks up in Autumn... peak water temps from a season of heating, with an upper atmosphere that is colder because nights grow longer, hence more convection, and in turn more cyclones.


The daytime tstorms over land are caused by a different mechanism.
The height that the cooling takes place in the diurnal variation we talked about is always at the height of the cloud tops, which can be anywhere from roughly 12-15,000 feet in shallow systems to 60 or even 70,000 feet in the mighty systems like Katrina or Rita.
Charts of these temp differences with height are called skewT diagrams or soundings.
Here's a good definition of the Lifted Index:
http://www.weather.gov/glossary/index.php?word=lifted+index

Sorry, I'm on lunch and had to rush this...
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5903
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#467 Postby MGC » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:13 pm

99L behavior to date is just as I expected. I've been saying that development if any would not occur until 99L reached the W. Carb. Sea. 99L should start slowing down soon, at at time the chances improve slightly. It will likely hit land before it spins....MGC
0 likes   

philnyc
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:14 am
Location: Brooklyn, New York City, New York
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#468 Postby philnyc » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:14 pm

Thanks for your insight Phil, good stuff, but I guess I didn't explain myself very well. If there is no energy at the surface will this heat transfer still take place. The reason I ask is because IMHO(uneducated weather nerd) I didn't think that 99l ever had much at the surface, yet it was greatly effected by the diurnal Max each evening or was that happenstance, maybe cloud deck keeping the surface cooler until the sun broke through?
Just trying to learn something, please excuse all the grammer errors


Unfortunatley I won't be back here til later today. But quickly, there is always a LOT of energy over water that warm. Any mechanism that can lift it, such as an eastery ave in this case, will cause it to lift quite high into tall tstorms, provided other criteria are present.
This wave is fascinating and very complex. I think a lot of the pros could not get a good handle on it, so don't feel left out. It always had a good MLC until now and that is often enough to keep tstorms going. The LLC forms due to very complex processes within the thunderstorm clusters near the center.
Oh, well, I'll have to finish later...
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#469 Postby SouthFloridawx » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:14 pm

I wouldn't rule out some type of Development in the BOC before moving inland, into Mexico.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#470 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:15 pm

Just noticed that 99L is no more in NRL, nor the back-up site. It seems the NHC completely unplugged 99L.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#471 Postby Sanibel » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:24 pm

99L is flattened on the top - so it is telling us it is riding under a guiding ridge. I agree with MGC. This will probably clip Honduras on a west track under that ridge. The forward speed is telling us it is being pushed by this ridge setting up in the Atlantic. The problem with 99L is the system is weaker than the surrounding synoptic. The surrounding synoptic therefore wins. On visible you can see the tropical flow bending NW in front of Yucatan. This could signal a slow down and turn before Yucatan. No way to tell until it happens.

Today the two ULL's, one in the Atlantic, one in the Caribbean, are folding and giving way as the Bermuda High finally sets up. You can see it on Caribbean WV loop.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#472 Postby tailgater » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:25 pm

philnyc wrote:
Thanks for your insight Phil, good stuff, but I guess I didn't explain myself very well. If there is no energy at the surface will this heat transfer still take place. The reason I ask is because IMHO(uneducated weather nerd) I didn't think that 99l ever had much at the surface, yet it was greatly effected by the diurnal Max each evening or was that happenstance, maybe cloud deck keeping the surface cooler until the sun broke through?
Just trying to learn something, please excuse all the grammer errors


Unfortunatley I won't be back here til later today. But quickly, there is always a LOT of energy over water that warm. Any mechanism that can lift it, such as an eastery ave in this case, will cause it to lift quite high into tall tstorms, provided other criteria are present.
This wave is fascinating and very complex. I think a lot of the pros could not get a good handle on it, so don't feel left out. It always had a good MLC until now and that is often enough to keep tstorms going. The LLC forms due to very complex processes within the thunderstorm clusters near the center.
Oh, well, I'll have to finish later...


Thanks again Phil, gotta run to work myself.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#473 Postby skysummit » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:26 pm

Has anyone in the New Orleans watched the 12 noon edition of WWL news? Reports are that they mentioned recon is going in just to take measurements. Anyone else hear this?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#474 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:29 pm

skysummit wrote:Has anyone in the New Orleans watched the 12 noon edition of WWL news? Reports are that they mentioned recon is going in just to take measurements. Anyone else hear this?


They just made that up.

ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. SUCCEEDING DAY DAY OUTLOOK.....NEGATIVE.
3. REMARKS: INVESTS IN CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO
FOR 03/1600Z AND 03/1800Z RESPECTIVELY BOTH
CANCELED BY NHC AT 03/1130Z.

RECON was cancelled at 730 AM EDT.
0 likes   

User avatar
tigergirl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 59
Age: 55
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Location: Larose,LA

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#475 Postby tigergirl » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:31 pm

I watched WWL broadcast at noon and that is what the meterologist said.
Just wondering the same thing if they were going or not.
I am not making this up. Maybe the meterologist was mistaken.
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#476 Postby mgpetre » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:52 pm

Why is that convection in Honduras racing NNW? Anything to watch here? Just doesn't look like an overall westward motion is in store anymore. Thoughts?
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#477 Postby skysummit » Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:59 pm

mgpetre wrote:Why is that convection in Honduras racing NNW? Anything to watch here? Just doesn't look like an overall westward motion is in store anymore. Thoughts?


That convection is being enhanced by the ULL interacting with the wave. The wave axis is already west of Jamaica, but it is leaving a piece of energy behind. That comes to play into my theory I posted earlier. What if this convection persists as it moves to the WNW and NW toward a more favorable area in the Yucatan Channel?
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#478 Postby jasons2k » Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:04 pm

MGC wrote:99L behavior to date is just as I expected. I've been saying that development if any would not occur until 99L reached the W. Carb. Sea. 99L should start slowing down soon, at at time the chances improve slightly. It will likely hit land before it spins....MGC


Yep, I was saying 4 days ago not to expect anything until it reached the central/W. Caribbean and then reassess...and as of now not much to assess...
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: Invest 99L Thread #6

#479 Postby vbhoutex » Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:22 pm

jschlitz wrote:
MGC wrote:99L behavior to date is just as I expected. I've been saying that development if any would not occur until 99L reached the W. Carb. Sea. 99L should start slowing down soon, at at time the chances improve slightly. It will likely hit land before it spins....MGC


Yep, I was saying 4 days ago not to expect anything until it reached the central/W. Caribbean and then reassess...and as of now not much to assess...


If 99L doesn't slam on the breaks soon it is even going to our race its' designation. I was figuring a reassessment in the W Carribean also, but if it doesn't slow down soon it will be in the pacific before I finish typing this thread. We have seen other fast moving invests come to fruition as TC's but I'm not to sure that 99L is going to be one of them. 2 days ago I thought it had a good core structure and that we would see something more by now. WRONG!!! I will still be watching, to say the least, but I definitely am not bullish on further development.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#480 Postby jasons2k » Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:56 pm

Yep, so far this is no Claudette
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Extratropical94, Google [Bot] and 24 guests