CajunMama wrote:As for the mets...how would you feel giving your professional opinion in the field that you specialize in and have someone that doesn't have nearly the education, experience and knowledge that you have, come in and always disagree with the met, thinking that he/she knows better. I've seen our mets patiently explain the same thing over and over and those who insist that the met is wrong pushes the met to his limit. Would any of you not lose your patience? Our mets have done a great job of educating us. Don't forget that they are volunteering to do this. We can't pay them...heck, we can't even pay our staff
Bingo. Nailed it. These are people who have worked hard for many years to get where they are now, and it makes me more than a little irritated when I see some kid with no significant understanding of tropical weather systems stand up and tell a professional meteorologist, who forecasts these phenomena for a living that they're wrong, especially when the met has explained the hows and whys behind their statements at least a dozen times, and the amateur's just throwing some uneducated opinion out there, and not trying to learn anything. I honestly can't blame a pro met if they get irritated and make a cynical remark out of frustration.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not railing on those who don't have an understanding of tropical weather. I used to be clueless about this stuff too, and we all have to start somewhere. What's important is that the amateurs are willing to observe, learn from, and look up to the pro mets, instead of stubbornly pushing the same tired, uneducated ideas that conflict with the predictions of trained experts as well as raw science. I've gained a massive amount of knowledge both from experience and by watching the pro mets' predictions and ideas, and I have a much more level-headed and rational view of what to look for and what to expect from tropical systems than I ever would have if not for this place.
As for the "chatter" problem, I've been around since 2003, and this chatter happens every year when everyone is anxious for something to happen; albeit there are a lot more people around since the events of 2005. Usually when serious stuff is going down this problem takes care of itself -- and if for some reason it continues, I'm sure the s2k staff will put a hiatus to it. I do agree that some more constructive posts would be nice, but there's only so much you can add to a conversation about a cluster of thunderstorms.
In short, it's one thing to have wild ideas that fly in the face of science and expert meteorologists. It's another thing to be so headstrong and stubborn that you argue those ideas against the opinions of trained professionals instead of listening to what they have to say and trying to learn.