Buoy has wind shift to the ssw..notice the approach had N winds and with its passage the wind shift. There's def an LLC
Combined with QSCAT and visuals the NHC could call it at any time.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Buoy has wind shift to the ssw..notice the approach had N winds and with its passage the wind shift. There's def an LLC
wjs3 wrote:WindRunner wrote:A quick run-through of the models on this system (or at least how they appeared at 00z before I left this morning) . . . even though 00z models have probably already been discussed already . . .
ECMWF is starting to realize that this is not the perfect situation . . . and is now adjusting its forecast accordingly. While both the GFS and CMC take this into the northern Caribbean at <1000mb around the day 6/7 time frame, the Euro instead opts for a weaker and more northerly track to a couple hundred miles NW of the Turks and Caicos by day 8. Upon further inspection of the GFS, the Euro seems to be a more sane option at this point. The GFS has an upper low drop southward just behind the cyclone as it passes 40W, and the trough coming off the East Coast now just misses the cyclone to the east about a day later . . . two awfully close (and awfully lucky) occurances. And of course if the negative upper level features are completely avoided, the environment is otherwise favorable . . . leading the GFS to really go wild with this system before it hits the islands. For example, the HWRF (based off the GFS) has a TS at 12z today, a hurricane by 06z Wednesday morning, and starts bombing it out beyond 114 hours (MSLP 960mb/100kts) through the end of the run at 126 hours (MSLP 948mb/110kts), at which point it is slightly northeast of the corresponding GFS position. Needless to say, as much as I'm sure some people would love to see it happen, the GFS and all related solution seem somewhat unreliable at this point . . . and until the storm gets going, similar idealized scenarios will be both commonplace and wrong.
Key feature to watch: Ridge over the southeast in the day 7-10 range (and associated weakness to the east) as that will be our main steering feature once it nears land.
OK, in a quick look at these two, I woud argue that the GFS even places the upper low in a perfect spot for intensification--it sits right where it needs to in order to provide an outflow channel for the system in the mid-atlantic. I used the Penn State e-wall for the euro and it did not seem to see that upper low (hard to tell becasue the 4 panels really aren't helpful there). As such, the aggressive outflow did not exist, and the system seemed weaker.
The GFS seems to have it miss the trough because the GFS is faster than the Euro with the system--the system is west of (and a bit south of) where it needs to be for the trough to get it in the GFS. So I think there's a forward speed issue at play too.
WJS3
bvigal wrote:wxman, I got an sudden warm and fuzzy feeling reading your post... it's good to know that you and others here, armed with experience and knowledge, are keeping an eye on this. Thanks!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests