Derek Ortt wrote:there is nothing that supports cat 5 yet. The FL winds are at FL, the SFMR and dropsondes are still below cat 5; thus, it is not a cat 5
We have exactly 156mph surface, don't we?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
mempho wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:there is nothing that supports cat 5 yet. The FL winds are at FL, the SFMR and dropsondes are still below cat 5; thus, it is not a cat 5
We have exactly 156mph surface, don't we?
Well, you don't know that, since SFMR winds haven't been received since the SE eyewall hours ago.RL3AO wrote:mempho wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:there is nothing that supports cat 5 yet. The FL winds are at FL, the SFMR and dropsondes are still below cat 5; thus, it is not a cat 5
We have exactly 156mph surface, don't we?
The .9 formula is a guesstimate. SMFR (?) doesn't show winds close to that.
mempho wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:there is nothing that supports cat 5 yet. The FL winds are at FL, the SFMR and dropsondes are still below cat 5; thus, it is not a cat 5
We have exactly 156mph surface, don't we?
Well, you don't know that, since SFMR winds haven't been received since the SE eyewall hours ago.[/quote]sevenleft wrote:The .9 formula is a guesstimate. SMFR (?) doesn't show winds close to that.
Sanibel wrote:You are looking at it the wrong way. You have to think of a muscular, large storm being pulled around at 918 pressure. Katrina was disasterous because it had a 902 pressure. The pressure pulled that surge. Dean should be the same.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest