TS FELIX: RECON Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Lowpressure
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2032
- Age: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion
Yes, I know. I was just saying that unfortunately for SA at some point the graphic will be correct. Kinda like the stopped clock.
0 likes
Re: Re:
CrazyC83 wrote:HURAKAN wrote:Accuweather is becoming the JTWC of the Atlantic. Unfortunately the JTWC does a much better job. Nevertheless, nothing says Accuweather can't do it, or you, or me.
The JTWC is semi-official (best described as a #2 source - JMA is the official source) being a NOAA agency.
JTWC is a DOD agency, not an NOAA/DOC one.
0 likes
- Lowpressure
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2032
- Age: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion
System not very impressive at all- to this point- per hunter. Minimal TD, with good potential down the road. IMO.
0 likes
Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion
Have the found any NW winds? There was a ship report from ELQQ4 of NW 22mph and 1009.5mb, so unless that ob doesn't pass QC. This looks like at 25kt TD at best, so far.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion
Thunder44 wrote:Have the found any NW winds? There was a ship report from ELQQ4 of NW 22mph and 1009.5mb, so unless that ob doesn't pass QC. This looks like at 25kt TD at best, so far.
Yes they did when they did the first pass of the center (albeit very briefly).
0 likes
Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion
They are flying around 400m meters so standard reduction is 80%. 29kts is about 23kts at the surface.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22950
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re:
Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs
I only listen to TWC - "The Hurricane Authority".
0 likes
- Lowpressure
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2032
- Age: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Re:
Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs
Totally agree Derek!
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 37988
- Age: 36
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: Re:
wxman57 wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs
I only listen to TWC - "The Hurricane Authority".

I had to rely on them for a couple of days during Dean due to a major internet outage, and the frequent mistakes they made were laughable. I can't even remember them all now but I know one time Dean was supposedly moving east.


0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2401
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:33 pm
- Location: Groningen, The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion
NOUS42 KNHC 311430
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1030 AM EDT FRI 31 AUGUST 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 01/1100Z TO 02/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-099
I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (LESSER ANTILLES)
FLIGHT ONE
A. 02/0000Z
B. NOAA2 0306A CYCLONE
C. 01/2000Z
D. 13.0N 67.5W
E. 01/2100Z TO 02/0300Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT TWO
A. 02/0600Z
B. AFXXX 0406A CYCLONE
C. 02/0400Z
D. 13.2N 69.2W
E. 02/0500Z TO 02/0830Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT THREE
A. 02/1200Z
B. NOAA3 0506A CYCLONE
C. 02/0800Z
D. 13.5N 71.0W
E. 02/0930Z TO 02/1430Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 12 HRLY FIXES.
P-3 DOPPLER RADAR MISSIONS EVERY 12 HRS
II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
JWP
The flight numbers are nn06A.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34001
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: Atlantic: Invest 94L: RECON Discussion
HenkL wrote:NOUS42 KNHC 311430
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1030 AM EDT FRI 31 AUGUST 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 01/1100Z TO 02/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-099
I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (LESSER ANTILLES)
FLIGHT ONE
A. 02/0000Z
B. NOAA2 0306A CYCLONE
C. 01/2000Z
D. 13.0N 67.5W
E. 01/2100Z TO 02/0300Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT TWO
A. 02/0600Z
B. AFXXX 0406A CYCLONE
C. 02/0400Z
D. 13.2N 69.2W
E. 02/0500Z TO 02/0830Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
FLIGHT THREE
A. 02/1200Z
B. NOAA3 0506A CYCLONE
C. 02/0800Z
D. 13.5N 71.0W
E. 02/0930Z TO 02/1430Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 12 HRLY FIXES.
P-3 DOPPLER RADAR MISSIONS EVERY 12 HRS
II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
JWP
The flight numbers are nn06A.
Interesting, first sign of an upgrade?
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5
- Posts: 8359
- Age: 64
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re:
Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs
Absolutely agree. First and foremost, you consistently put out verifiable forecast tracks. Accuweather has only very rarely and sporadically issued verifiable forecasts - preferring to speak in generalities and produce vague and sometimes (as today) very inaccurate graphics.
BTW, over 4 hours and counting (and a recon vortex message saying 1009mb) and Accuweather still says this has a pressure of 988mb.
0 likes
- oyster_reef
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:05 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Re:
x-y-no wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:Accuweather's products do not even compre to the ones I out out. To say they are number 2 to NHC is beyond laughable. I know of quite a few other forecasts that easily beat theirs
Absolutely agree. First and foremost, you consistently put out verifiable forecast tracks. Accuweather has only very rarely and sporadically issued verifiable forecasts - preferring to speak in generalities and produce vague and sometimes (as today) very inaccurate graphics.
BTW, over 4 hours and counting (and a recon vortex message saying 1009mb) and Accuweather still says this has a pressure of 988mb.
but all in all, they are the best recognized and most profitable weather service in the open marktet. They are a business and they have done that well.
McDonalds doesn't make the best burger either. They do make money.
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5
- Posts: 8359
- Age: 64
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: Re:
oyster_reef wrote:but all in all, they are the best recognized and most profitable weather service in the open marktet. They are a business and they have done that well.
McDonalds doesn't make the best burger either. They do make money.
True, but you don't see McDonalds trash-talking Bobby Flay about the quality of his burgers.
If I hear one word of boasting about how they called this TD 6 hours before NHC did, I'm going to be absolutely outraged.
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 143863
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re:
Derek Ortt wrote:besides, NHC called this TD 6 very early today... they have already issued 3 forecasts on this system. So no, Accuwx did NOT call this before NHC
Those are not for public comsumption right?
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 19989
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: Re:
cycloneye wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:besides, NHC called this TD 6 very early today... they have already issued 3 forecasts on this system. So no, Accuwx did NOT call this before NHC
Those are not for public comsumption right?
How can a government agency like NHC produce forecasts that aren't for public consumption? Is there an explanation of this somewhere?
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests