Invest 92L Near Leewards- Discussions & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
crownweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 595
Age: 50
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am
Location: Sturbridge, Massachusetts
Contact:

#201 Postby crownweather » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:48 pm

Out of curiousity, how accurate is the SHIPS intensity shear forecast?? Weblink I use is ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/stext/
SHIPS seems to be forecasting stronger shear with 92-L with the 18Z run than what it forecasted with the 12Z run.

Thanks!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#202 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:50 pm

noticed the same crown..globals seem to indicate a rather favorable environment for strengthening..looking forward to the 00z runs..
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Invest 92L East of Leewards-Discussions & Images

#203 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:51 pm

Cold front-NO! Ridge NO! COld front NO! Ridge NO!!!


OHHHH GOSSSHHH I am going to go insane
I can't take this any more. My sanity is gone!

:yesno: :yesno:
0 likes   

User avatar
Typhoon_Willie
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1042
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 3:19 pm
Location: Greenacres City, Florida

Re: Invest 92L East of Leewards-Discussions & Images

#204 Postby Typhoon_Willie » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:54 pm

I beleive it has been mentioned that the cold fromt may very well not pick this up...
0 likes   

destruction92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:43 pm

Re: Invest 92L East of Leewards-Discussions & Images

#205 Postby destruction92 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:57 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Guys what is supposed to happen? Will the ridge
build strong and make FL threatened by 92L?
Or will the cold front sweep it out??? I'm sorry
but what does everyone think. It's so confusing.
SOmebody says ridge. ANotehr says cold front
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:


First off, let me say WOW! You have managed to include 90L, 91L, and 92L along with a ridge, trough, and cold front all in one heck of a paragraphed comment...what is even more scary is that you placed all of these factors into perfect relevance and context of one another. I must admit that I am officially confused as of this moment. If I do not get an informed opinion about what Tampa Bay Hurricane has discussed, think I may need to go to talkin' tropics rehab if this keeps up. :grrr:
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#206 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:58 pm

18z NAM Florida bound..If the pattern set-up indicated by NAM verifies(well-established ridge) this system will cross the southern FL peninsula before turning NW/N towards the central/east gulfcoast...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
0 likes   

destruction92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:43 pm

Re:

#207 Postby destruction92 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:02 pm

Vortex wrote:18z NAM Florida bound..If the pattern set-up indicated by NAM verifies(well-established ridge) this system will cross the southern FL peninsula before turning NW/N towards the central/east gulfcoast...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml


It keeps it as an open tropical wave. Nothing to worry about, at least in the perspective of the NAM.
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Re:

#208 Postby canegrl04 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:03 pm

Vortex wrote:18z NAM Florida bound..If the pattern set-up indicated by NAM verifies(well-established ridge) this system will cross the southern FL peninsula before turning NW/N towards the central/east gulfcoast...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml



I guess we would soon find out how prepared NOLA is since katrina :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#209 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:06 pm

crownweather wrote:Out of curiosity, how accurate is the SHIPS intensity shear forecast?? Weblink I use is ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/stext/
SHIPS seems to be forecasting stronger shear with 92-L with the 18Z run than what it forecasted with the 12Z run.

Thanks!!


There are a number of problems with the SHIPS shear forecast. First, it requires an accurate forecast of upper-level winds, something that's not easy in a data-sparse region. But one other problem is how the shear is taken into consideration. Shear is examined over a very large area (north to south). High shear in any part of this area would yield a negative indicator for development. This isn't bad for large systems that have a great latitudinal extent, but for smaller systems it can greatly overestimate the shear, yielding intensity forecasts that are way too low. In the case of 92L, it's a small system so what's happening 300 or 600 miles north of the center is meaningless as far as wind shear.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions=5:30 PM TWO Shortly

#210 Postby Blown Away » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:07 pm

There is a nice little spin but almost all the deep convection is gone. If 92L goes north of the Hebert Box I say no go for Florida. 92L maybe setting us up for a let down.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Re:

#211 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:07 pm

canegrl04 wrote:
Vortex wrote:18z NAM Florida bound..If the pattern set-up indicated by NAM verifies(well-established ridge) this system will cross the southern FL peninsula before turning NW/N towards the central/east gulfcoast...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml



I guess we would soon find out how prepared NOLA is since katrina :eek:

whoa... calm down with the comparisons to Katrina. This is not a Katrina. Let's not hype.

Actually, I think that if this does not hit Hispaniola, it might have a shot at FL before it rides up the East Coast. There doesn't seem to be much of a threat to the Gulf Coast with this one, IMO.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#212 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:09 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
canegrl04 wrote:
Vortex wrote:18z NAM Florida bound..If the pattern set-up indicated by NAM verifies(well-established ridge) this system will cross the southern FL peninsula before turning NW/N towards the central/east gulfcoast...

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml



I guess we would soon find out how prepared NOLA is since katrina :eek:

whoa... calm down with the comparisons to Katrina. This is not a Katrina. Let's not hype.

Actually, I think that if this does not hit Hispaniola, it might have a shot at FL before it rides up the East Coast. There doesn't seem to be much of a threat to the Gulf Coast with this one, IMO.


At that point in the Atlantic, Katrina was a wave as well...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#213 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:10 pm

Also, SHIPS can indicate high shear when that shear is merely enhancing the outflow. Thus, what SHIPS sees as bad, may be quite beneficial for development (the poster child of this is Wilma)
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: Re:

#214 Postby Blown Away » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:10 pm

wxman57 wrote:
crownweather wrote:Out of curiosity, how accurate is the SHIPS intensity shear forecast?? Weblink I use is ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/stext/
SHIPS seems to be forecasting stronger shear with 92-L with the 18Z run than what it forecasted with the 12Z run.

Thanks!!


There are a number of problems with the SHIPS shear forecast. First, it requires an accurate forecast of upper-level winds, something that's not easy in a data-sparse region. But one other problem is how the shear is taken into consideration. Shear is examined over a very large area (north to south). High shear in any part of this area would yield a negative indicator for development. This isn't bad for large systems that have a great latitudinal extent, but for smaller systems it can greatly overestimate the shear, yielding intensity forecasts that are way too low. In the case of 92L, it's a small system so what's happening 300 or 600 miles north of the center is meaningless as far as wind shear.


Ok so what's your take on 92L?
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Invest 92L East of Leewards-Discussions & Images

#215 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:11 pm

destruction92 wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:
MortisFL wrote:This year will be an interesting one for the central Gulf Coast and the Carolinas....Florida will have to wait IMO.


Isn't your season about over, Rock? Storms find a hard time making it that far west as the season progresses.


Texas is still in season now, but the season does start shutting down as the Wersterlies come back for the Fall, and the first cold front of the year is predicted around Tuesday.

When Rita was approaching this general direction, mi suegro said it wouldn't get here, we'd already had a cold front, and, in fact, it did turn up just before Texas. (Of course, the Western side still did a pretty good job on Beaumont/Pt Arthur, and even here in HOU we lost power for a day). October has had a single hurricane, a barely Cat 1 Jerry in 1989, in six decades.

Whereas, IIRC, Borderline Cat2/Cat 3 Hurricane Kate hit Florida in November. A short hurricane season, no state income taxes, no earthquakes, lower tornado per square mile ratio than Oklahoma, Tex-mex food, all part of living in God's Country, Western Hemisphere edition.


Please, everyone, let's get back on topic and start discussing 92L. I myself will get back to topic. Let's not make this a thread about how Texas or any other state for that matter is "overdue" for a hurricane or something.

Given the current synoptics, I am speculating a Carolina impact due to a weakening ridge...I may be wrong though and I admit it. Okay? So please, let's try to have a civil debate here. :(




I didn't say Texas was overdue. Almost the opposite, while the window isn't completely closed yet, the change to Fall has already begun, and with two fronts forecast into SE Texas in the next 7 days, the window is closing. What I said is, this far out, 92L is a potential threat from Louisiana to the Carolinas, and even the Northeast isn't 100% safe, in my amateur opinion.



12Z GFS 500 mb flow would seem to suggest the East Coast is at greatest risk by next weekend, with flow along the East Coast almost meridonal.

If the 12Z GFS 500 mb forecast is correct, of course.
Last edited by Ed Mahmoud on Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions=5:30 PM TWO Shortly

#216 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:12 pm

Thanks for the explanations, but

OK I give up. I totally give up. This
is so confusing.

Too confusing:
:crying: :Pick: :crazyeyes:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: Invest 92L East of Leewards-Discussions & Images

#217 Postby Ixolib » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:17 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:There is absolutely no connection between 1935 and 2007 whatsoever.

Well, now, what do you think these two would have to say about that...
Image
Sorry.... Back to business now.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions=5:30 PM TWO Shortly

#218 Postby Brent » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:18 pm

TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL1
530 PM EDT SUN SEP 9 2007

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER IS ISSUING ADVISORIES ON TROPICAL
STORM GABRIELLE...LOCATED INLAND ABOUT 45 MILES NORTHWEST OF CAPE
HATTERAS NORTH CAROLINA.

A BROAD AREA OF LOW PRESSURE...ASSOCIATED WITH A TROPICAL WAVE...IS
LOCATED ABOUT 800 MILES WEST-SOUTHWEST OF THE CAPE VERDE ISLANDS
AND IS PRODUCING A LARGE AREA OF CLOUDINESS AND THUNDERSTORMS.
CONDITIONS APPEAR CONDUCIVE FOR GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SYSTEM
DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS AS IT MOVES WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT
ABOUT 15 MPH.

SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS ASSOCIATED WITH A TROPICAL WAVE A FEW
HUNDRED MILES EAST OF THE LEEWARD ISLANDS HAVE DIMINISHED SOMEWHAT
THIS AFTERNOON. DEVELOPMENT...IF ANY...OF THIS SYSTEM IS EXPECTED
TO BE SLOW TO OCCUR AS IT MOVES WESTWARD AT ABOUT 15 MPH. THIS
WAVE COULD BRING SHOWER ACTIVITY TO THE NORTHERN LEEWARD ISLANDS
DURING THE NEXT DAY OR TWO.


DISORGANIZED SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS OVER THE SOUTHERN GULF OF
MEXICO ARE ASSOCIATED WITH A WEAK SURFACE TROUGH AND AN UPPER-LEVEL
LOW. CONDITIONS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE FAVORABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
THIS SYSTEM.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$

FORECASTER BLAKE
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions=5:30 PM TWO at page 11

#219 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:27 pm

Joe Bastardi cut a special Sunday video for 92L.

The GOMEX system, per JB, could have the upper shear relax just in time, before Texas or Mexico, for a quick Erin type TS development.

OK, he was 30 mb too strong, but he did pick Gabrielle a week before it developed.


I'll post this in 92L thread as well, as while JB says too early to pick landfall, he says conditions will be extremely favorable over the Bahamas when 92L arrives. He thinks it could be big ticket. He didn't discuss EATL monster wave too much, but he seemed to imply yesterday it was also big ticket, and he wasn't at all sure it would recurve.
0 likes   

User avatar
crownweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 595
Age: 50
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am
Location: Sturbridge, Massachusetts
Contact:

#220 Postby crownweather » Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:30 pm

Any thoughts on how much this will flare up, based on the current sfc and U/A conditions late tonight into Monday morning during diurnal maximum?? To me shear values look quite favorable ahead of this system, which would lead me to say further development is fairly likely. In addition, dry air looks minimal at worst.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests