TD INGRID: Discussions & Images - Last Advisory

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
TheShrimper
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:05 pm

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1841 Postby TheShrimper » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:59 pm

I agree. Knock this crap off TBH, it is really getting old.
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1842 Postby jaxfladude » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:01 pm

As of now, if TD#8 can hold it's own until after it passes the forecasted high shear area and stays on the current forecasted track it could become big trouble, is that the gist of it?
Last edited by jaxfladude on Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1843 Postby JTD » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:02 pm

Whoah :eek: :eek:

Hang on a second here guys. We are in an ACTIVE cycle. 2005, just 2 years ago, smashed almost every single hurricane record that there is to be smashed. We had 2 category 5 landfalls just in August/Early September, something that has never happened before. The rate of deepening for Felix was to quote the NHC "one of the more faster rates of deepening that we have ever observed" and Humberto just last night deepend at a rate never seen before in history per the NHC 11 a.m. discussion. The Atlantic from Isabel 2003 to Ivan 2004 to Katrina 2005 to Dean and Felix 2007 has been popping up monster storms at an astonishing pace.

Now, I am making no prediction whatsoever about TD #8, but to think that the potential for RI doesn't exist is flatly ridiculous after what we have seen this past decade.

Not saying and don't even think that TD #8 will do that but seeing potential for a storm to POTENTIALLY do that is not at all unreasonable given what we have seen in the recent past!!
Last edited by JTD on Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1844 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:03 pm

fox13weather wrote:Why aren't the boards all renamed "My reasons why TD (insert number here) will become a CAT 5 and pound the US"?



Thank you! My thoughts exactly!!
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1845 Postby jaxfladude » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:03 pm

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:
:flag:
0 likes   

destruction92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:43 pm

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1846 Postby destruction92 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:03 pm

fox13weather wrote:Why aren't the boards all renamed "My reasons why TD (insert number here) will become a CAT 5 and pound the US"?


Because the board is not filled with people I disagree with.
At least the people here back their opinions with some substance, observations, and some evidence.
I don't think it is very nice to ridicule people for not agreeing...instead we should try to educate each other and remove "topical weather" ignorance.

I for one think TD8 can reach hurricane status because global models are not reliable when it comes to their intensity predictions...they are good mainly for their tracking.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1847 Postby miamicanes177 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:05 pm

SFMR finds a tropical storm Ingrid (not a TD) with 40mph winds (so far).
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1848 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:06 pm

Latest:

Image

LETS GET BACK ON TOPIC: TD 8.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10147
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1849 Postby Blown Away » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:06 pm

Image[/quote]

So based on the shear map, TD8 has not even come close to the significant shear. Look how much it struggled w/ relatively low shear today. If that strong shear is N of PR area it would be unlikely TD8 could do much developing. Now the uncertainity is will that really strong shear be N of the PR area in 5 days?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#1850 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:08 pm

It looks like a pre-2004 system. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#1851 Postby deltadog03 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:09 pm

I am fully confident that this will be upgraded at 11pm....They are just about or basically finding TS winds and they are not even close to the center. Look at the maps at where the obs are taken. (not even close to the center yet)
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1852 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:09 pm

destruction92 wrote:
fox13weather wrote:Why aren't the boards all renamed "My reasons why TD (insert number here) will become a CAT 5 and pound the US"?


Because the board is not filled with people I disagree with.
At least the people here back their opinions with some substance, observations, and some evidence.
I don't think it is very nice to ridicule people for not agreeing...instead we should try to educate each other and remove "topical weather" ignorance.

I for one think TD8 can reach hurricane status because global models are not reliable when it comes to their intensity predictions...they are good mainly for their tracking.


I agree with you to a point of it being that time of year, BUT there are plenty of people I disagree with here, but most will never ever admit it...Nobody wants to be called that....It's just that not every depresson or storm that pops will be a major hurricane, plain and simple......That's the only point I"m trying to say....
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1853 Postby fci » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:12 pm

fox13weather wrote:Why aren't the boards all renamed "My reasons why TD (insert number here) will become a CAT 5 and pound the US"?



Wish you were my local met!!!!!!

:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:
:notworthy:
0 likes   

User avatar
HeeBGBz
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Age: 71
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:25 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1854 Postby HeeBGBz » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:13 pm

gatorcane wrote:wow its blowing up this evening....

TS Ingrid? Looks like she is a fighter and I think baffling those at the NHC and on this board.


She just didn't want to upstage Humberto. Now we're down to business.

I hope this one doesn't line up for that Katrina scenario. Or for that matter a Frederic (Whose anniversary was yesterday).
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1855 Postby jaxfladude » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:14 pm

HeeBGBz wrote:
gatorcane wrote:wow its blowing up this evening....

TS Ingrid? Looks like she is a fighter and I think baffling those at the NHC and on this board.


She just didn't want to upstage Humberto. Now we're down to business.

I hope this one doesn't line up for that Katrina scenario. Or for that matter a Frederic (Whose anniversary was yesterday).

Or a Dora for NE Florida
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1856 Postby jasons2k » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:16 pm

For the 2nd time, please stay on topic. Mods have been instructed to hand-out suspensions without warning and this the 2nd warning on this page alone.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1857 Postby miamicanes177 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:19 pm

NOAA plane confirms significant tropical storm Ingrid has formed

000830 1313N 04832W 6429 03854 0102 +043 +043 267021 023 049 016 00

SFMR 49kts
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1858 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:20 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:NOAA plane confirms significant tropical storm Ingrid has formed

000830 1313N 04832W 6429 03854 0102 +043 +043 267021 023 049 016 00

SFMR 49kts


With FL winds of 23kt. I would ignore that reading unless they get more.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1859 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:21 pm

RL3AO wrote:
miamicanes177 wrote:NOAA plane confirms significant tropical storm Ingrid has formed

000830 1313N 04832W 6429 03854 0102 +043 +043 267021 023 049 016 00

SFMR 49kts


With FL winds of 23kt. I would ignore that reading unless they get more.


Same here but I could be wrong. I still think 35 kt (maybe 40 kt) is the correct intensity at this moment.
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re: Trop Dep EIGHT: Discussions & Images-5 PM EDT at page 87

#1860 Postby jhamps10 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:21 pm

yeah I'm ingoring the 49 kt sfmr, but we have 2 40 kt sfmr's right in between the 49 kt report.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests