Tropical Depression TEN: Discussions & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#221 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:48 pm

Latest IR SAT frame shows intense storms (reds showing up) but more activity seems to be brewing farther east of the peninsula than the models are showing it right now.....

anybody think the "center" may actually form more offshore SE Florida giving it time to develop before moving onshore?

Here is the loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/watl/loop-avn.html
Last edited by gatorcane on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#222 Postby cpdaman » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:48 pm

just walked dog to beach before i go back to work, the seas and winds are up a good deal from mid morning. probably gusting to 30 in s. palm beach county with sustained around 20-23 IMO

and wow the ULL looks like it's signature improved 10x since this morning to the west of tampa, unless this thing is flying west i don't see how the shear around it would not create anything but a subtropical type storm

is the ULL development pushing the convergance/ precip shield east off florida and is the low level circulation still intact
Last edited by cpdaman on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#223 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:49 pm

skysummit wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:SHIPS has almost no shear at this time tomorrow.

The UL likely is not going to have the influence on shearing this that I thought yesterday (isn't as sheared as I thought it would be currently even)


Derek, why is the SHIPS showing such low shear as early as tomorrow? Is it figuring the ULL moving away quicker than we're currently thinking?

The SHIPS is picking up on the fact the sfc low will be in close proximity to the upper low...at least that is how I read it. I think it is a bit of a red-herring. Zero shear in this case doesn't mean ideal conditions...since it will be near the center of the upper low. Look at the forecast upper level charts. The sfc low moves close to where the upper low itis...so SHIPS sees low shear...it's not under low shear in the middle of antic-cyclonic flow...its under low shear in the middle of cyclonic flow. Thats a big difference.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#224 Postby Brent » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:49 pm

Can someone get SSD to put a floater on this?
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#225 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:53 pm

Brent wrote:Can someone get SSD to put a floater on this?



Where is Dixie when you need her..LOL
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#226 Postby cpdaman » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:54 pm

is vivian brown from TWC a meteorologist or just an on air personality

she keeps saying it is an upper level feature and they are waiting on a possible low level circulation to form

then i read the 205 marine statement talking about a strengthening low near bimini

geez what gives
Last edited by cpdaman on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

babyblue4791
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:06 am

Re: Re:

#227 Postby babyblue4791 » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:54 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
skysummit wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:SHIPS has almost no shear at this time tomorrow.

The UL likely is not going to have the influence on shearing this that I thought yesterday (isn't as sheared as I thought it would be currently even)


Derek, why is the SHIPS showing such low shear as early as tomorrow? Is it figuring the ULL moving away quicker than we're currently thinking?

The SHIPS is picking up on the fact the sfc low will be in close proximity to the upper low...at least that is how I read it. I think it is a bit of a red-herring. Zero shear in this case doesn't mean ideal conditions...since it will be near the center of the upper low. Look at the forecast upper level charts. The sfc low moves close to where the upper low itis...so SHIPS sees low shear...it's not under low shear in the middle of antic-cyclonic flow...its under low shear in the middle of cyclonic flow. Thats a big difference.


What is SHIPS?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#228 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:55 pm

however, SHIPS keeps the system under low shear until landfall. 200mb divergence/convergence is only accounting for a -2KT change in the model

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation

GFS goes fully anti-cyclonic in 48 hours
Last edited by Derek Ortt on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38088
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#229 Postby Brent » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:55 pm

cpdaman wrote:is vivian brown from TWC a meteorologst or just an on air personality

she keeps saying it is an upper level feature and they are waiting on a possible low level circulation to form

then i read the 205 marine statement talking about a strengthening low near bimini

geez what gives


LOL... I admit I just saw it too. I don't rely on them for primary info anymore because of just this situation. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
wzrgirl1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#230 Postby wzrgirl1 » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:56 pm

Derek,

Do you expect this to be named before it crosses south florida?
0 likes   

User avatar
TreasureIslandFLGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1581
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#231 Postby TreasureIslandFLGal » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:56 pm

When this thing does cross the state, it is expected to rapidly pass over and head west, correct? --or is there a possibility that this will be a slow-mover and, even worse, potentially stall in the gulf? right now I'm hoping for nothing but a little much needed rain from Jerry. We have company coming into town tomorrow and staying through the weekend. Please tell me that there is no chance of this getting off the west coast and then really cranking up...without moving west quickly...causing our weather here to be a mess and having to evacuate!? (we are on a barrier island)
0 likes   

caneman

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#232 Postby caneman » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:57 pm

Plents of West winds, at one buoy sustained running 30 mps and 40 in gusts. Pressured dropping quite a bit How long til classified?
0 likes   

tracyswfla
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 792
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 1:19 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Re: Re:

#233 Postby tracyswfla » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:57 pm

What is SHIPS?[/quote]Taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_c ... tion_model
"tropical cyclone forecast model is a computer program that uses meteorological data to forecast the motion and intensity of tropical cyclones. Such models utilize powerful supercomputers with sophisticated mathematical modeling software and meteorological data to calculate paths and intensities. There are two general types, statistical and dynamical, and two primary types of forecasts, track and intensity."

SHIPS (Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme) is a statistical model that uses climatological, persistence and synoptic predictors.
Last edited by tracyswfla on Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Re:

#234 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:58 pm

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:To me if you look at those models and the current SAT image it reminds me alot of Frances -- although Frances was much stronger..

wow here we go again.

latest:

Image



LMAO ..Yea that looks exactly like frances...maybe whn she left Africa!


I'm shocked that anyone is comparing this to Frances or any other "organized" named system right now. It not even close to that.
0 likes   

User avatar
hial2
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Indian trail N.C.

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#235 Postby hial2 » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:59 pm

Remember Humberto went from nothing to 85 mph in a matter of hours..not that it's going to happen in this instance,but....it does seem to be developing fast!
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#236 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:00 pm

Is there even a surface low yet? Can somebody show me where it is?
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#237 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:00 pm

Brent wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Yes, that is why I think the NHC may consider tropical storm warnings for parts of Florida tonight.

Just my opinion.

Another thing to consider is the possibility of tornado watches/warnings with all the vorticity in the atmosphere....


If they put TS warnings up then it has to be at least a TD first. They don't put them up for invests only. It's certainly possible... could see another "surprise" storm.


Like I said last night...once the low closes off and deepens just a little...we should have a TS no problem just due to gradient conditions ALONE. There is a steep gradient in place already and just a little lower pressure is all that is needed to create some TS force winds on the north side...albeit 60-100 miles from the center.

Also...not sure why so many of you are acting surprised. What is happening now off the east coast of FL is by no means a shocker. The synoptic setup was almost perfect...and keeping that in mind...it isn't going to get on a runaway train like Humberto did. It will follow the synoptics and deepen to a certain extent (while off of Florida)...its not going to pull a Katrina or Humberto right now...so everyone can remain calm. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145300
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#238 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:00 pm

The LATEST at 19:45 UTC

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Re:

#239 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:01 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:To me if you look at those models and the current SAT image it reminds me alot of Frances -- although Frances was much stronger..

wow here we go again.

latest:

Image



LMAO ..Yea that looks exactly like frances...maybe whn she left Africa!


I'm shocked that anyone is comparing this to Frances or any other "organized" named system right now. It not even close to that.


no the point was that it is the size of Frances, not as strong obviously but the size of it is similar.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: INVEST 93L (ATL): Discussion & Images

#240 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:02 pm

Updated recon...


NOUS42 KNHC 182000 AMD
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
0400 PM EDT TUE 18 SEPTEMBER 2007
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 19/1100Z TO 20/1100Z SEPTEMBER 2007
TCPOD NUMBER.....07-116 AMENDMENT

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA (CHANGED)
FLIGHT ONE (ADDED)
A. 20/0000Z
B. NOAA9 01XXA SYNOPTIC
C. 19/1730Z
D. N/A
E. N/A
F. 41,000 TO 45,000 FT

2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: PROBABLE LOW LEVEL INVEST
NEAR 25.5N 88.0W AT 20/1800Z. ANOTHER G-IV MISSION
FOR 21/0000Z (ADDED)

II.PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
SEF
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests