Tropical Depression TEN: Model Runs

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wiggles
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 32
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Slidell, LA

#361 Postby wiggles » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:58 pm

I truly would love to know what that is below 93L. Where is it coming from?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs=18z GFS Rolling in

#362 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:58 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:New Orleans yet again...Still believe it latched to the EC low


read my post above..it did but lost it and latched on to the one sw of Florida in 12 hr
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re:

#363 Postby jhamps10 » Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:59 pm

wiggles wrote:I truly would love to know what that is below 93L. Where is it coming from?


NW Caribbean.
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs=18z GFS Rolling in

#364 Postby jhamps10 » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:00 pm

Ivanhater wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:New Orleans yet again...Still believe it latched to the EC low


read my post above..it did but lost it and latched on to the one sw of Florida in 12 hr


you sure bout that?

sorry IMO, any run that latches on to the EC low is suspect right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#365 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:02 pm

plus any low that moves a storm NW from the SW coast of FL to New Orleans under a ridge is suspect too. I think a general W or WNW motion (as seen with the EURO) is more likely. Even Derek Ortt's blog said that if the storm forms south of Tampa, it will likely hit Texas.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs=18z GFS Rolling in

#366 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:02 pm

jhamps10 wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:New Orleans yet again...Still believe it latched to the EC low


read my post above..it did but lost it and latched on to the one sw of Florida in 12 hr


you sure bout that?

sorry IMO, any run that latches on to the EC low is suspect right now.


Lol..Im positive...look at GFS and NAM at 12 hours...they both have the low SW of Florida and STILL move it northwest...not my opinion..just what the runs have
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#367 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:03 pm

My bro (kfdm pro met) said it latched but heck who knows? LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re:

#368 Postby skysummit » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:06 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:plus any low that moves a storm NW from the SW coast of FL to New Orleans under a ridge is suspect too. I think a general W or WNW motion (as seen with the EURO) is more likely. Even Derek Ortt's blog said that if the storm forms south of Tampa, it will likely hit Texas.


Yea, but it's not moving it north into a ridge. On this run, just like the last few, the GFS has a ridge over Texas. That's why it's not sending it west. The EURO is seeing the opposite. One will be right, but which one?

The one good thing about this run is shear looks to really pick up as it's nearing the coast line.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#369 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:10 pm

Exactly, the GFS has the ridge back over TX, the EURO has it moving eastward thus sending it back toward TX.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#370 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:16 pm

Hmm..

Does anyone notice that after the GFS shows the system hitting NOLA that it suddenly shoots it back to the south?

72 hrs = http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_072l.gif

78 hrs = http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_078l.gif

Then, after heading south it goes on to move it into the TX/LA border area...

84 hrs = http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_084l.gif

Pretty strange, IMO.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#371 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:18 pm

You beat me to the post...Once on the TX/LA border its gone on 9/24
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re:

#372 Postby jhamps10 » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:18 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:Hmm..

Does anyone notice that after the GFS shows the system hitting NOLA that it suddenly shoots it back to the south?

72 hrs = http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_072l.gif

78 hrs = http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_078l.gif

Then, after heading south it goes on to move it into the TX/LA border area...

84 hrs = http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... n_084l.gif

Pretty strange, IMO.


actually EWG, it does not move it back south, or if it does, it aien't much. What you are most likely referring to is the low, that is coming out of the NW Carribean, but at 84, 93L is at about the same latitude as the 72 hour image.
Last edited by jhamps10 on Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#373 Postby skysummit » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:19 pm

It's not shooting it back to the south. That's another low coming up from the northwestern Caribbean that heads north.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#374 Postby skysummit » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:25 pm

18z GFDL.....


718
WHXX04 KWBC 192320
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER

NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR

TROPICAL DEPRESSION INVEST 93L

INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 19

DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.


FORECAST STORM POSITION

HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)

0 27.9 80.2 345./ 8.0
6 28.0 80.4 308./ 2.2
12 28.8 81.1 317./ 9.6

STORM DISSIPATED AT 12 HRS AT THE ABOVE PSN.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#375 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:28 pm

The GFDL kills the system b/c it initializes the low currently near the east coast of Florida. If the storm forms SW of Florida though, then we will be looking at a whole different situation.
0 likes   

jhamps10

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#376 Postby jhamps10 » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:30 pm

skysummit wrote:18z GFDL.....


718
WHXX04 KWBC 192320
CHGQLM
ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER

NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR

TROPICAL DEPRESSION INVEST 93L

INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 19

DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.


FORECAST STORM POSITION

HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)

0 27.9 80.2 345./ 8.0
6 28.0 80.4 308./ 2.2
12 28.8 81.1 317./ 9.6

STORM DISSIPATED AT 12 HRS AT THE ABOVE PSN.


well, that was a waste of a run.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#377 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:30 pm

Do you know that GFDL losses it for that reason or was shear involved?
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#378 Postby PTPatrick » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:30 pm

IMHO...GFS didnt "latch" onto the EC low...it simply initialized that it was there...which it was. The GFS then shows the low off southwest FL in 12 hours which it would appear will be correct. So I dont think GFS is as far out to lunch as some people claim. Sure this could be a texas hit but who knows.

Also, could the reason GFDL dissapates it be because it actually was run on the EC low...which is now dissapated to give way to the SW coast low...perhaps the GFDL needs to see the right low before it can get a handle. I think the GFDL is rather specific to what it is supposed to be run on and in all fairness it probably initialized the first low...
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#379 Postby skysummit » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:33 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Do you know that GFDL losses it for that reason or was shear involved?


Because it initialized the wrong low. It initialized the one off the east coast. The primary low will be off the southwest coast. Once the models initialize it, I suspect them to shift west a bit to the northern Texas coast and southwest - southcentral Louisiana.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: INVEST 93L : Model Runs

#380 Postby PTPatrick » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:38 pm

ITs true the GFDL is crap because it initialized the wrong low... BUT the GFS is not. It does see the right low. So, nothing constitutes a big shift. I think a lot of people are saying boo to the GFS when it really for the short term is doing better than Euro...because the EURO did NOT see the first low.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests