Ex Tropical Depression KAREN: Discussions & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1321 Postby SouthFLTropics » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:02 am

There is no question about it, she is fighting for her life. It seems like she is attempting to take the path of least resistance and try and avoid the shear to stay alive. The convection is not all that impressive but the circulation is still very evident.

SFT
0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3222
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

Re: Re:

#1322 Postby chris_fit » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:03 am

wxman57 wrote:Just the opposite. The northerly motion means relative shear is down. Convection is returning to very near the center. Could hang in there and actually BE a TS by this afternoon.



I was just about to ask about this. My thinking too... By going north it will actually have a greater chance at survival.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

Re:

#1323 Postby Chacor » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:10 am

Derek Ortt wrote:some good news for the Karen fans... the working best track file does have Karen as a hurricane for 12 hours


I noticed that, Derek. NRL, based off ATCF, was carrying Karen at 65 kt for a while (but the TPC adv went with 60 and a note that it probably was a hurricane).

Anyway, any idea why the TPC went from a restrengthening scenario (50 kts) to 30 knots flat out for five days? That seems to be quite big a change in an intensity forecast in just six hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1324 Postby BigA » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:13 am

wxman57 wrote:Just the opposite. The northerly motion means relative shear is down. Convection is returning to very near the center. Could hang in there and actually BE a TS by this afternoon.


Would moving north move it out of the high shear area more quickly than a WNW/NW course?
0 likes   

User avatar
AnnularCane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2862
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
Location: Wytheville, VA

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1325 Postby AnnularCane » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:16 am

Karen looks so tiny all of a sudden.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#1326 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:23 am

Derek Ortt wrote:Karen is moving due north. I cannot understand how one could derive a WNW track out of due north


Because they weren't forecasting a due north motion...so its still moving WNW until they have no choice.

Now...if they were forecasting a turn to the north you can bet your last dime the 11 Am advisory would have stated it was moving north.

Its that whole forecast verification thing.
0 likes   

Lifesgud2
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: South Florida Baby

Re: Re:

#1327 Postby Lifesgud2 » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:27 am

Air Force Met wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Karen is moving due north. I cannot understand how one could derive a WNW track out of due north


Because they weren't forecasting a due north motion...so its still moving WNW until they have no choice.

Now...if they were forecasting a turn to the north you can bet your last dime the 11 Am advisory would have stated it was moving north.

Its that whole forecast verification thing.


I know it is difficult, but what is this thing going to do in the coming days? Is the shear supposed to let up?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1328 Postby wxman57 » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:30 am

AnnularCane wrote:Karen looks so tiny all of a sudden.


That's because it's intensifying as relative shear decreases. Convection isn't 150+ miles from the center now, it's only 20 miles from the center.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1329 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:31 am

Sudden move to the north and now convection very close to the center, eastern side. This is why I love the tropics!

Now I wonder why, when, and if it will help.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#1330 Postby storms in NC » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:32 am

You can see in this Vloop that she is tring very hard to wrap Convection around her. As she goes NORTH

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Re:

#1331 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:34 am

Air Force Met wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Karen is moving due north. I cannot understand how one could derive a WNW track out of due north


Because they weren't forecasting a due north motion...so its still moving WNW until they have no choice.

Now...if they were forecasting a turn to the north you can bet your last dime the 11 Am advisory would have stated it was moving north.

Its that whole forecast verification thing.


I respectfully disagree. It seems to me that there's a fine line between wobble watching and direction changes. I bet they will admit in the next discussion that what they thought was a large wobble turned out to be a direction change. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Nothing predicted a due north motion so I think they chose the most reasonable route. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1332 Postby wxman57 » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:39 am

6-hr movement toward 2 deg (North) at 13.5 kts. It moved 81 miles due north the past 6 hours.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#1333 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:43 am

Lifesgud2 wrote: I know it is difficult, but what is this thing going to do in the coming days? Is the shear supposed to let up?


Well...it's hard to deny the current trend and that the models didn't see it. As far as the shear goes...I don't think it will let up any time soon...other than the relative fact that it is moving north with the flow. It will be an uphill climb.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1334 Postby wxman57 » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:48 am

Comparing current motion to NHC 10am track, the center will cross 16N near 49.1W in just under 2 hours. NHC has the center crossing 16N at 51W near 10pm-11pm this evening. That's about 120 miles west of where the center will cross 16N. From its current position, it needs to move at 283 deg. to reach 16N/51W.
0 likes   

User avatar
Fego
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 767
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1335 Postby Fego » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:51 am

There she goes.. up north. 12:30 p.m. The red x is the NHC initial point, and the yellow line is the proyected path... aprox...

Image
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: Re:

#1336 Postby otowntiger » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:55 am

tolakram wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:Karen is moving due north. I cannot understand how one could derive a WNW track out of due north


Because they weren't forecasting a due north motion...so its still moving WNW until they have no choice.

Now...if they were forecasting a turn to the north you can bet your last dime the 11 Am advisory would have stated it was moving north.

Its that whole forecast verification thing.


I respectfully disagree. It seems to me that there's a fine line between wobble watching and direction changes. I bet they will admit in the next discussion that what they thought was a large wobble turned out to be a direction change. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Nothing predicted a due north motion so I think they chose the most reasonable route. :)


Isn't it true little weak storms like this don't really wobble. Its a term that should only apply to those tightly wound systems with a clear eye. Those wobble, because the eye within the whole storm sometimes is spinning like a top, and moves around withing the storm. A little weak storm like this just moves one way or the other. It has no tight spin in order for it to wobble. That's just my opinion.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#1337 Postby Air Force Met » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:56 am

tolakram wrote: I respectfully disagree. It seems to me that there's a fine line between wobble watching and direction changes. I bet they will admit in the next discussion that what they thought was a large wobble turned out to be a direction change. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Nothing predicted a due north motion so I think they chose the most reasonable route. :)


You are free to disagree but it doesn't change the fact that they do this all the time...I've watched them do it for years and its usually predictable. Movement is movement. From the earliest visible images is was obvious it wasn't a wobble. Sheared systems don't wobble in one direction for hours at a time at 12+ knots. That's a movement that is caused by a change in the steering flow.

And it is a certainty that if a northward turn had been forecasted...what they were observing this morning would have been described as "KAREN IS NOW MOVING NORTH NEAR 9 MPH." You can bet on it and that is what I am saying. But...since WNW is the forecast...they hold off until they can't any longer. So I guess the point is don't call it one thing when it is convenient and fits the forecast and another when it doesn't.

What would have been prudent would have been to say "KAREN HAS BEEN MOVING TOWARDS THE NORTH AT 9 MPH OVER THE LAST FEW HOURS BUT A TURN BACK TO THE WNW IS FORECASTED."

And actually the BAMD did predict the turn. It sees the deep layer steering flow would direct a storm northward because of increasing shear. Karen was deeply stacked apparently and responded.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1338 Postby Blown Away » Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:00 pm

Definite convection building to the E and it looks much better than earlier this morning. I'm stunned how far off track Karen is from the NHC track, I can picture those guys over at the NHC glued to a monitor watching Karen go N and scratching their heads. :D
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Tropical Storm KAREN: CEN ATL: Discussions & Images

#1339 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:03 pm

Thanks for taking the time to explain AFM.
0 likes   

User avatar
DelrayMorris
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Delray Beach, FL

Re: Re:

#1340 Postby DelrayMorris » Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:08 pm

RattleMan wrote:
DelrayMorris wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:some good news for the Karen fans... the working best track file does have Karen as a hurricane for 12 hours


What does that mean, Derek? (the working best track file)

I don't see how Karen can be a hurricane in 12 hours. She seems to be impressively holding on to BARELY TS status right now. Does the 'working best track file" actually have any accuracy?


No, that's not it...

"the working best track file does have Karen as a hurricane for 12 hours"

That means, at one point, for 12 hours, it was a hurricane.


Thanks, everyone. I learned something new today. I was heartily confused by that for a bit.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests