cycloneye wrote:Thankfully Humberto did what it did,close to the Texas coast or it would be close to a major.
With all due respect, Humberto was losing its backside quickly and in my opinion, even if it had another 24 hours over water, it would not have been a major. It ramped up to its potential, given the pattern of the time, and that was it. Radar showed that it was being eroded from the SW and was more like a half-a-cane than a hurricane. I firmly believe that even if it had been 200 miles farther out to sea, given the same conditions, that it would have peaked out at maybe 100 mph, but not 115 or higher. Still, it takes nothing away from the record strengthening that it underwent before landfall.
This is in direct contrast to the Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 which went from TS to cat-5 in very little time or other notables such as Wilma in 2005, etc. These ramped up and had IMPROVING conditions around them, not limited good conditions like Humberto had.
I guess the other way to look at it, is that if Humberto had encountered better conditions earlier, then it would have had time to reach major-cane strength. But that's like saying "If only so and so had made that last second shot instead of it rimming out- they would have won the game." All things being equal, it is my guess that Humberto was what it was and could have been no more even with more time over water.