12/30-31/2007 Snowstorm: Initial Thoughts

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

12/30-31/2007 Snowstorm: Initial Thoughts

#1 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Dec 28, 2007 11:31 pm

Based on the latest computer guidance and a relatively stable synoptic environment, I am increasingly confident that a system will track off shore (not inland) in the December 30-31 timeframe, producing an area of moderate snowfall. The storm's fairly rapid movement will likely preclude chances of a much more substantial snowfall.

In my opinion, rather than the danger that the storm tracks west of the I-95 cities, I believe the higher risk is that it is more suppressed along the lines of some earlier runs of the NAM and GFS. The modest shift to the south and east in the forecast storm track on both the 0z NAM and GFS may well be highlighting this somewhat greater risk.

If one examines the 12/28 12z and 18z Superensemble guidance, one finds that there is no strong signal that the expansive Southeast ridge is backing westward nor that it is growing stronger. Instead, one finds only a signal for perhaps a somewhat deeper storm.

Image

Based largely on the good continuity between the 12/28 0z and 12z runs of the ECMWF and GFS and the 12/29 0z runs of the NAM and GFS, my snowfall thoughts are as follows:

High risk of 2" or more; Moderate risk of 4" or more:
Allentown, Boston, Hartford, Providence, Worcester

By the time the storm has departed, Boston should have set a new December snowfall mark. There is the possibility that Boston's December snowfall could reach or exceed 30".

The following cities also have a reasonable potential to pick up several inches of snow, though my confidence is a little lower: Concord, Harrisburg, New York City, Newark, and Portland. Even Philadelphia has a chance to get into the proverbial game.

As has so often been the case this winter, the NAM and GFS have some sizable disagreements. At some point tomorrow, I may make my initial snowfall estimates.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#2 Postby donsutherland1 » Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:12 pm

Not much change in thought from last night...

A fast-moving system will likely deliver a stripe of 3"-6" snows with some local amounts up to 8". Along coastal areas, it will take time for a warm layer to be overcome. Unfortunately, given the storm's character as a fast-mover, it will likely be a case of too little, too late for those areas. Hence, cities such as New York and Philadelphia likely will miss out on meaningful accumulations. Nevertheless, there remains a chance that this could change. If necessary, I will update amounts, but probably not until I have seen the 12/30 0z and perhaps 12/30 12z guidance and checked the soundings at 12z to see how the actual conditions match the guidance.

For now, my initial snowfall estimates are as follows:

Albany: 2"-4"
Allentown: 2"-4"
Boston: 3"-6"
Burlington: 2"-4"
Concord: 3"-6"
Harrisburg: 1"-3"
Hartford: 3"-6"
Islip: 1" or less
Montreal: 1"-3" (2.5 cm - 7.5 cm)
New York City: 1" or less
Newark: 1" or less
Philadelphia: 1" or less
Portland: 2"-4"
Providence: 1"-3"
White Plains: 2"-4"
Worcester: 3"-6"
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#3 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:04 am

Through the 0z guidance, big differences have emerged between the colder 0z NAM and warmer 0z GFS. For some areas that the GFS has suddenly made borderline, I have opted for a degree of continuity, especially as the overall synoptic picture has not changed greatly. Unfortunately, I am now much more confident that cities such as Newark and New York will not receive much snowfall.

My snowfall estimates are as follows:

Albany: 3"-6"
Allentown: 2"-4"
Boston: 3"-6"
Burlington: 2"-4"
Concord: 4"-8"
Harrisburg: 1"-3"
Hartford: 3"-6"
Islip: 1" or less
Montreal: 1"-3" (2.5 cm - 7.5 cm)
New York City: 1" or less
Newark: 1" or less
Philadelphia: 0.5" or less
Portland: 4"-8"
Providence: 1"-3"
White Plains: 2"-4"
Worcester: 4"-8"
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#4 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:17 pm

Few changes are in order despite the very warm GFS depictions in recent runs. As a result, there is some significant bust potential for such cities as Boston. Nevertheless, I believe the storm's dynamics should be sufficient to promote a thermal profile that is marginally conducive to some accumulating snow. Hence, I will leave my estimate for Boston as it presently stands.

My final snowfall estimates are as follows:

Albany: 3"-6"
Allentown: 1"-3"
Boston: 3"-6"
Burlington: 3"-6"
Concord: 4"-8"
Harrisburg: 1"-3"
Hartford: 3"-6"
Islip: 1" or less
Montreal: 2"-4" (5.1 cm - 10.2 cm)
New York City: 1" or less
Newark: 1" or less
Philadelphia: 0.5" or less
Portland: 4"-8"
Providence: 1"-3"
White Plains: 1"-3"
Worcester: 4"-8"
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: 12/30-31/2007 Snowstorm: Initial Thoughts

#5 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:34 pm

Tragically, despite temps in mid 30sF, NYC area and Long Island plain rain.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#6 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:56 pm

how about sending an arctic blast down to florida with moisture
and some good snow for me Don :ggreen:
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

Re: 12/30-31/2007 Snowstorm: Initial Thoughts

#7 Postby terstorm1012 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:40 am

We received about an inch here in Harrisburg, most of which stuck well after dark.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#8 Postby donsutherland1 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:44 pm

Verification:

A bad forecast. Just 8/16 (50%) of sites verified. Of the 8 that busted, 3 (38%) had an error of 2" or greater and 7 (88%) had an error of 1" or more.

From 12/29/2007 1:09 pm:
Albany: 2"-4"; Actual: 10.1"; Error: 6.1"
Allentown: 2"-4"; Actual: 0.7"; Error: 1.3"
Boston: 3"-6"; Actual: 0.8"; Error: 2.2"
Burlington: 2"-4"; Actual: 7.2"; Error: 3.0"
Concord: 3"-6"; Actual: 10.1"; Error: 4.1"
Harrisburg: 1"-3"; Actual: 1.0"; Within range
Hartford: 3"-6"; Actual: 3.9"; Within range
Islip: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Montreal: 1"-3" (2.5 cm - 7.5 cm); Actual: 2.9" (7.4 cm); Within range
New York City: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Newark: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Philadelphia: 1" or less; Actual: None; Within range
Portland: 2"-4"; Actual: 8.0"; Error: 4.0"
Providence: 1"-3"; Actual: Trace; Error: 1.0"
White Plains: 2"-4"; Actual: Trace; Error: 2.0"
Worcester: 3"-6"; Actual: 2.5"; Error: 0.5"

From 12/30/2007 1:01 am:
Albany: 3"-6"; Actual: 10.1"; Error: 4.1"
Allentown: 2"-4"; Actual: 0.7"; Error: 1.3"
Boston: 3"-6"; Actual: 0.8"; Error: 2.2"
Burlington: 2"-4"; Actual: 7.2"; Error: 3.0"
Concord: 4"-8"; Actual: 10.1"; Error: 2.1"
Harrisburg: 1"-3"; Actual: 1.0"; Within range
Hartford: 3"-6"; Actual: 3.9"; Within range
Islip: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Montreal: 1"-3" (2.5 cm - 7.5 cm); Actual: 2.9" (7.4 cm); Within range
New York City: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Newark: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Philadelphia: 0.5" or less; Actual: None; Within range
Portland: 4"-8"; Actual: 8.0"; Within range
Providence: 1"-3"; Actual: Trace; Error: 1.0"
White Plains: 2"-4"; Actual: Trace; Error: 2.0"
Worcester: 4"-8"; Actual: 2.5"; Error: 1.5"

From 12/30/2007 5:15 pm:
Albany: 3"-6"; Actual: 10.1"; Error: 4.1"
Allentown: 1"-3"; Actual: 0.7"; Error: 0.3"
Boston: 3"-6"; Actual: 0.8"; Error: 2.2"
Burlington: 3"-6"; Actual: 7.2"; Error: 1.2"
Concord: 4"-8"; Actual: 10.1"; Error: 2.1"
Harrisburg: 1"-3"; Actual: 1.0"; Within range
Hartford: 3"-6"; Actual: 3.9"; Within range
Islip: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Montreal: 2"-4" (5.1 cm - 10.2 cm); Actual: 2.9" (7.4 cm); Within range
New York City: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Newark: 1" or less; Actual: Trace; Within range
Philadelphia: 0.5" or less; Actual: None; Within range
Portland: 4"-8"; Actual: 8.0"; Within range
Providence: 1"-3"; Actual: Trace; Error: 1.0"
White Plains: 1"-3"; Actual: Trace; Error: 1.0"
Worcester: 4"-8"; Actual: 2.5"; Error: 1.5"
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest