Physical basis of limit calculations

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Physical basis of limit calculations

#1 Postby Ptarmigan » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:12 pm

Kerry Emanuel wrote this article. As it turns out, warm water is not the only factor. Also, it depends on wind sheer. In addition, it depends on how high and cold the cloud tops are. Some hurricanes have formed in less than warm water because their cloud tops were high and cold, like Wilma in 2005.

Physical basis of limit calculations

Maximum Potential Intensity based on location. The lowest is the Persian Gulf, where waters are as high as 100 degrees F or 38 degrees C. The central pressure form them is 715 to 736 mb with 265 to 275 knots (305 to 315 mph) winds, which would make it a hypercane. :eek: Of course that will never happen due to dry air and hot sinking air in that region. For Galveston it is 840 to 867 mb with 185 to 205 knots (210 to 235 mph) winds. If a hurricane with 867 mb was to hit us, Houston area would be leveled. :eek: :cry:

Potential Intensity Estimates for Individual Cities and Regions
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#2 Postby Squarethecircle » Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:20 pm

141 m/s is insane... Imagine that some basins in the past probably had even greater potential intensities. I wonder if anything like that has ever occurred in all of history.
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re:

#3 Postby Cryomaniac » Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:23 pm

Squarethecircle wrote:141 m/s is insane... Imagine that some basins in the past probably had even greater potential intensities. I wonder if anything like that has ever occurred in all of history.


I'm sure it has.
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#4 Postby Squarethecircle » Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:19 pm

:uarrow: God, imagine how intense they could've been tens of millions of years ago when the heat content was huge. The sat pictures would be amazing. Any guess as to what a hypercane might look like?
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re:

#5 Postby Cryomaniac » Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:40 pm

Squarethecircle wrote::uarrow: God, imagine how intense they could've been tens of millions of years ago when the heat content was huge. The sat pictures would be amazing. Any guess as to what a hypercane might look like?


:uarrow: Thats what I was thinking. I dunno what a hypercane would look like, but I'm guessing similar to Wilma, but even more perfect.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Re:

#6 Postby Cyclone1 » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:12 pm

Cryomaniac wrote:
Squarethecircle wrote::uarrow: God, imagine how intense they could've been tens of millions of years ago when the heat content was huge. The sat pictures would be amazing. Any guess as to what a hypercane might look like?


:uarrow: Thats what I was thinking. I dunno what a hypercane would look like, but I'm guessing similar to Wilma, but even more perfect.


I'm not sure... but hey. I have Photoshop! Give me ten minutes.
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#7 Postby Squarethecircle » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:21 pm

:uarrow: Not entirely sure Photoshop could render that kind of bad-&$%-ness in one image.

I mean, those things could eat Mike Tyson!
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Physical basis of limit calculations

#8 Postby Cyclone1 » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:11 pm

Can I prove you wrong with this image? Maybe not, but I really like the outcome. That's Paka from 1997, with a shrunken eye to make it look stronger.


Ladies and Gentlemen, your hypercane. o_O
Image
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#9 Postby RL3AO » Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:30 pm

Tip is about as close to a hyper cane as we will know about in our lifetime (hopefully).

At one time Tip had a TS force wind field of 1380 miles. The distance from Brownsville to Miami is 1075 miles.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re:

#10 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:31 pm

Squarethecircle wrote::uarrow: God, imagine how intense they could've been tens of millions of years ago when the heat content was huge. The sat pictures would be amazing. Any guess as to what a hypercane might look like?


Somehow I picture a hypercane as a large annular-like hurricane with massive rainbands surrounding it. A hypercane would dump 100 inches of rain in a few hours and produce storm surge as high as 80 to 100 feet and have winds of 300 to 700 mph. :eek:
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

#11 Postby Cyclone1 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:44 pm

Well, it can't be annular and have rainbands. That's like being a vegetarian except for beef, pork and chicken.

Annular means large eye, no rainbands. But I know what you mean.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re:

#12 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:46 pm

Cyclone1 wrote:Well, it can't be annular and have rainbands. That's like being a vegetarian except for beef, pork and chicken.

Annular means large eye, no rainbands. But I know what you mean.


I've seen non-annular hurricane with large eyes. Hurricane Katrina comes to mind.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Re:

#13 Postby Cyclone1 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:52 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:
Cyclone1 wrote:Well, it can't be annular and have rainbands. That's like being a vegetarian except for beef, pork and chicken.

Annular means large eye, no rainbands. But I know what you mean.


I've seen non-annular hurricane with large eyes. Hurricane Katrina comes to mind.

Well, yeah, some non-annular canes can have large eyes, but all annular canes do.

Plus theres a lot of other features of ann canes that make them different, either way, they're relatively rare.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane and 24 guests