F-117 Nighthawk retired

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

F-117 Nighthawk retired

#1 Postby x-y-no » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:06 pm

The last four F-117 stealth fighters quietly made their final flight today. Because much of the plane is still classified, there was no public fanfare.

They were born shrouded in mystery in a windowless building in Burbank. They flew combat missions over Serbia and Iraq virtually invisible to enemy radar. And today, the black, bat-like F-117A Night Hawks will fly quietly into the night as stealthily as they came.

The last four of the world's first stealth fighters will make their final flights from Palmdale to a secret desert base in Nevada, where they will be locked up indefinitely in a secure concrete hangar.

...

The single-seat F-117 was the first plane that could evade radar detection; it was designed to fly into heavily defended areas to knock out radar installations and anti-aircraft missile batteries, clearing the way for other fighters and bombers. It was also used to destroy military command and communication centers.

The planes cost $45 million each, and 59 were built. The F-117 first flew in combat during the 1989 Panama invasion that led to the capture of dictator Manuel Noriega. F-117s were also among the first aircraft to strike targets in the Persian Gulf War in 1991 and in the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

In 2006, with the introduction of the F-22, a fighter that features the latest stealth technology, the Pentagon decided to retire all 59 of the F-117s, leading to today's final flights.


Link
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

#2 Postby Squarethecircle » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:08 pm

Its time was limited. It was not only a less efficient fighter, but the F-22 effectively replaced its stealth.

I was never a big fan of the thing, though I know some who were.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#3 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:27 pm

F-117 was kind of misnamed anyway. Maybe it had an air combat capability that wasn't discussed because it was classified, but the best I could tell, it was a stealth attack plane, not a stealth fighter. A-117 might have been a more accurate designation.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#4 Postby x-y-no » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:37 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:F-117 was kind of misnamed anyway. Maybe it had an air combat capability that wasn't discussed because it was classified, but the best I could tell, it was a stealth attack plane, not a stealth fighter. A-117 might have been a more accurate designation.


Agreed. An "A" designation would have been more appropriate. But I expect this was yet more deliberate obfuscation.
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#5 Postby Squarethecircle » Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:39 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:F-117 was kind of misnamed anyway. Maybe it had an air combat capability that wasn't discussed because it was classified, but the best I could tell, it was a stealth attack plane, not a stealth fighter. A-117 might have been a more accurate designation.


I agree; it was hardly even used in dogfights compared to more fighter-esque planes.
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#6 Postby mf_dolphin » Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:07 pm

It's still sad to see the ugly-duckling put to bed.
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

Re:

#7 Postby Squarethecircle » Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:13 pm

mf_dolphin wrote:It's still sad to see the ugly-duckling put to bed.


It certainly boosted the toy fighter plane market. On that front, I'm sure a lot of people are upset. :wink:
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#8 Postby RL3AO » Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:20 pm

I think the naming had to do with confusing the Soviets. At least I think thats what I heard on the History or Military channel.
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#9 Postby mf_dolphin » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:48 pm

You can bet the Soviets weren't confused. :-) The F-117 fell into a strange category for the Air Force, it really wasn't a fighter but there was no way they were going to associate this baby with the only 2 other A class aircraft (A-10 Thunderbolt II and AC-130 Spectre/Spooky). Being the sexiest thing flying at the time it got the benefit of the doubt and got the F classification. There was some talk of the F-117 being equipped to carry the AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missile but that was just talk as far as I know. Using that type of aircraft for air-air operations just didn't make sense. The mission for the F-117 was built for one purpose and that was for deep strike against heavily defended targets and it did it very well. So long warrior!
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#10 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:01 pm

The USAF flew a version of the Navy's light attack jet, the A-7 Corsair II. The Navy operated other 'A' designated planes, such as the A-3D Skywarrior and the A-4 Skyraider, the type flown by John McCain when he was shot down, and the recently retired A-6E Intruder. My ship had an EA-3D from the electronic intelligence squadron VQ-1. It flew as a spy plane almost 40 years after it first saw service as the Navy's first nuclear weapon capable attack plane.



My carrier (the USS Chuck Wagon (CVN-70) was the last carrier to transition from the A-7E to the F/A-18. There was talk, when some F-14s were being grounded for emergency inspection because a few were found with wing root cracks, that if the entire F-14 fleet was grounded, the A-7E, armed with 2 AIM-9L Sidewinders and a 20 mm Vulcan cannon, might become the alert fighter while the F-14 was fixed. This was about 1986, and might have just been scuttlebutt.


I believe the A-7E was also the last single engine carrier based plane the Navy ever intends to fly.

Below, a USAF A-7D Corsair II

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Beam
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:06 pm

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#11 Postby Beam » Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:59 am

Shame, it was my favorite aircraft as a kid.

As has been said, however, the F-22 outclasses it (and pretty much everything else, for that matter) so it was about time to wrap things up.
0 likes   

User avatar
Jack8631
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 702
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Location: Central Alabama

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#12 Postby Jack8631 » Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:13 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:The USAF flew a version of the Navy's light attack jet, the A-7 Corsair II. The Navy operated other 'A' designated planes, such as the A-3D Skywarrior and the A-4 Skyraider, the type flown by John McCain when he was shot down, and the recently retired A-6E Intruder. My ship had an EA-3D from the electronic intelligence squadron VQ-1. It flew as a spy plane almost 40 years after it first saw service as the Navy's first nuclear weapon capable attack plane.



H&MS-31 had a few A-4's well into the 80's. No idea why; guess they were used as trainers or something. Did the Intruder in the mid-late 80's with VMA(AW)-224. They were in Cherry Point back then. Nice, reliable bird. The (AW) was for real. Also did the EA-6B with VMAQ-2. Hard to believe it outlived the F-117 in terms of service. Different missions, but still. It seems like every generation has a bird that outlives all others. The C-130 is a good example. I'll forever be an F-4 guy (showing my age). :)
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#13 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:25 pm

I know back into the 1980s the Navy used the A-4 as one of the 'enemy' planes in the 'Top Gun' school in Miramar because it had some similar characteristics to a Soviet block fighter. Not sure which Soviet block fighter.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#14 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:36 pm

Per Wiki, the A-4 Skyhawk was chosen for Top Gun because it had similar characteristics of the MiG-17. I think I called the A-4 'Skyraider' above, that name belongs to the Spad, or A-1
0 likes   

User avatar
Jack8631
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 702
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Location: Central Alabama

#15 Postby Jack8631 » Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:41 pm

Ah, yes. I seem to recall something along those lines. That would make sense, and why they were attached to HQ. Thanks, Ed.
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#16 Postby mf_dolphin » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:34 pm

To me the F-4 had the same characteristics as a pit bull. Not sleek, not pretty but you had no doubts of it's intentions when they were hunting.....and they were all bad. :-) The F-15 Eagle was a race horse with a nasty bite, pure bred and built for speed. My favorite fighter of all time though has to be the P-51D Mustang. The and I do mean THE sexiest fighter ever to be built IMO. It's still one impressive war bird on the ground or in the air. A real classic piece of perfection.
0 likes   

User avatar
DanKellFla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1291
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:02 pm
Location: Lake Worth, Florida

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#17 Postby DanKellFla » Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:33 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:
I believe the A-7E was also the last single engine carrier based plane the Navy ever intends to fly.



The carrier version of the F-135 has one engine.

The F-117 had no dogfighting capability. It was strickly a bomber. The F-22 is far superior in all ways to the F-117 except for cost. The F-117 was retired to open up funds for addtional F-22s and as a way to claim a need for more F-22s. The F-117 was one of the first airplanes to be developed by the Skunkworks after Kelly Johnson retired and Ben Rich took over. Maybe it was the first. The capabilities of the F-22 and F-135 are truly amazing. Hopefully, building them won't bankrupt the Defense Department.
0 likes   

User avatar
Jack8631
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 702
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:49 am
Location: Central Alabama

Re:

#18 Postby Jack8631 » Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:58 pm

mf_dolphin wrote:To me the F-4 had the same characteristics as a pit bull. Not sleek, not pretty but you had no doubts of it's intentions when they were hunting.....and they were all bad. :-) The F-15 Eagle was a race horse with a nasty bite, pure bred and built for speed. My favorite fighter of all time though has to be the P-51D Mustang. The and I do mean THE sexiest fighter ever to be built IMO. It's still one impressive war bird on the ground or in the air. A real classic piece of perfection.


Oh, absolutely. I think the F-4 was designed to see how much thrust you can put behind a boat anchor. :lol: We used to call it the Lead Sled. Mean, mean aircraft...but it didn't have much of a glide slope without power. Pretty much J-79's first. :eek:

The P-51 was indeed sexy. Beautiful airplane, very sleek for the day.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#19 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:20 pm

why was it not called the B-117... since it was a bomber aircraft (albiet a relatively light bomber aircraft)
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: F-117 Nighthawk retired

#20 Postby brunota2003 » Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:50 pm

Jack8631 wrote:H&MS-31 had a few A-4's well into the 80's. No idea why; guess they were used as trainers or something. Did the Intruder in the mid-late 80's with VMA(AW)-224. They were in Cherry Point back then. Nice, reliable bird. The (AW) was for real. Also did the EA-6B with VMAQ-2. Hard to believe it outlived the F-117 in terms of service. Different missions, but still. It seems like every generation has a bird that outlives all others. The C-130 is a good example. I'll forever be an F-4 guy (showing my age). :)

Haha, small world. I betcha Havelock has grown a LOT since you were here back then...we even have a Wal-Mart now! The Harriers still fly though, until the JSF completely phases them out =( My mom worked on OV-10's at New River Air Station for a couple years.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests