Myanmar / TC NARGIS (TC 01B) Update: 84,500 dead

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
StormspinnerD2

#481 Postby StormspinnerD2 » Wed May 07, 2008 6:51 pm

I don't think that's the case, I believe late April through mid-May is one of the peaks of the year-round season in that area.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#482 Postby HURAKAN » Wed May 07, 2008 7:05 pm

zaqxsw75050 wrote:http://www.citizensugar.com/1609388

Al Gore Ties Myanmar Cyclone to Global Warming

:roll:


If that's the case, then the 1970 Bangladesh Cyclone was also because of GW. I support the GW debate, but I fear Al Gore has gone too far away with the idea.
0 likes   

Ad Novoxium
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 348
Age: 34
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:12 am

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#483 Postby Ad Novoxium » Wed May 07, 2008 7:31 pm

Al Gore seems, sadly, to have been overtaken by his ideology. Yes, maybe global warming had something to do with hurricanes, but now into the future, it seems that he's become a little mad involving the idea, like many people who, when one bad thing happens, immediately blame whatever they hate or crusade against. I still believe global warming though.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Re:

#484 Postby Cyclone1 » Wed May 07, 2008 7:34 pm

RL3AO wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:For many of us, this is the deadliest cyclone in our lives.

There can't be that many people under 17 on here.

EDIT: There are probably quite a few actually.


I know of several, myself included.

EDIT: And yes, Al Gore is taking this waaaaaay too far. You can't blame a single hurricane on GW, or really, not even a hurricane season.

2005 was followed by 2006, ya know. :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
zaqxsw75050
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#485 Postby zaqxsw75050 » Wed May 07, 2008 7:46 pm

seriously, if Al Gore would spend 5 minutes look up tropical cyclone in wikipedia would save himself a lot of embarrassment.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: Re:

#486 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed May 07, 2008 8:16 pm

Cyclone1 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:For many of us, this is the deadliest cyclone in our lives.

There can't be that many people under 17 on here.

EDIT: There are probably quite a few actually.


I know of several, myself included.

EDIT: And yes, Al Gore is taking this waaaaaay too far. You can't blame a single hurricane on GW, or really, not even a hurricane season.

2005 was followed by 2006, ya know. :wink:


If Al Gore would spend 5 minutes looking through hurricane records, Wikipedia tropical cyclone area to name one. He would understand that hurricanes have been killing tens and even hundreds of thousands of people since humans moved onto the coastlines. In fact before satellites and all the cool stuff we enjoy today. What just happen to Burma, was a lot more likely in the old days, with a lot less warnings. I'm sorry, but it's just crazy to call a weather event that has been happening for god know how long to 'something' that supposed to be climatic-long term. In has nothing to do with short term weather.
0 likes   

User avatar
zaqxsw75050
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#487 Postby zaqxsw75050 » Wed May 07, 2008 8:31 pm

Jeff Master interview on Nargis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvkFJDuZanY
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#488 Postby RL3AO » Wed May 07, 2008 8:43 pm

Anomalies from May 1.

Image
0 likes   

StormspinnerD2

#489 Postby StormspinnerD2 » Wed May 07, 2008 10:10 pm

France urges UN to force cyclone aid on Myanmar

Given Burma's previous history when it comes to accepting international aid, the UN will probably have to do this. The junta can't keep disallowing aid from certain countries in order to preserve its own image and "honour", especially when its own aid is very poor - seven helicopters is woefully inadequate.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#490 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 07, 2008 10:11 pm

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080507/ts_ ... E1JsIE1vAI

Myanmar government is estimating 70,000 dead now
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#491 Postby Chacor » Wed May 07, 2008 10:25 pm

Radio NZ: "She says it is not a confirmed death toll but recent estimates by the Myanmar government put the number of deaths at 70000"

It is still officially 22,000.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#492 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed May 07, 2008 10:33 pm

some estimates of the death toll in one single province are at 80,000:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080508/ts ... eiUNVg.3QA
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#493 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 07, 2008 10:47 pm

that 80,000 number seems to be solid, unfortunately.

The 100,000 estimate may unfortunately be on the low side
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#494 Postby Sanibel » Wed May 07, 2008 10:51 pm

Yeah, and the two category 5er's into Central America were just lucky...
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#495 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 07, 2008 10:51 pm

Another source to the 80,000 quoted by a military official

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st ... 37,00.html

Last report from Myanmar state TV is now 22980, but that appears to be from several hours ago
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#496 Postby Sanibel » Wed May 07, 2008 10:57 pm

If anyone has a motion rerun of the satellite I'd like to see it to see what I missed and understand what a historic storm looks like.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#497 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 07, 2008 10:59 pm

might try the NRL site and look at the archives.

Compare it near landfall to Wilma and Felix and you'll see why I am convinced this was at least upper cat 4
0 likes   

User avatar
RattleMan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1218
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:14 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re:

#498 Postby RattleMan » Wed May 07, 2008 11:05 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:might try the NRL site and look at the archives.


Here are the archives for anyone who can't find them: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc08/IO/01B.NARGIS/

Also:
Wilma: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc05/ATL/25L.WILMA/
Felix: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc07/ATL/06L.FELIX/
0 likes   

User avatar
zaqxsw75050
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#499 Postby zaqxsw75050 » Wed May 07, 2008 11:16 pm

<---- visible shot at landfall

Felix
Image

Dean
Image

Nargis
Image
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: Bay of Bengal: NARGIS (TC 01B) Update=+22,000 dead

#500 Postby Sanibel » Wed May 07, 2008 11:24 pm

Image


I've looked at many archived NRL shots. I think we screwed up here on a serious storm. The shot above shows what looks to be an explosive RI phase with hazed eye. Sort of like Katrina before its eye cleared out, but a completely different structure more like a compact Labor Day killer in RI phase. I don't blame people for missing it because the storm is deceptive with bad-looking structure and a weak-looking eye, but a look at the NRL shots shows it had the entire Bay as a feeding source as can be seen in the different satellite shots. I thought some were exaggerating about the intensity, but now that I see it I agree. This is one of those late bloomers that was probably well into category 4 waiting to blow the eye clear at category 5. The image above shows a storm in intense strengthening. It could be we weren't expecting it in May.*&^%

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc08/IO/01B.NARGIS/ir/geo/1km_bw/20080502.1230.meteo7.x.ir1km_bw.01BNARGIS.115kts-937mb-159N-937E.100pc.jpg
Last edited by Sanibel on Wed May 07, 2008 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests