Nimbus wrote:She is still stacking herself apparantly, and yes aric I think the punter is going to miss.
we are all going to die!!! lol im just sitting back a watching everyone go back and forth.. its quite funny
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Nimbus wrote:She is still stacking herself apparantly, and yes aric I think the punter is going to miss.
Derek Ortt wrote:senorpepr wrote:I've been noticing the system elongating SW to NE, most notibly on microwave. Also, it appears dry air is being ingested into the system.
Mike,
I dont see the elongation of the core region
I do see the outflow becoming slight better defined.
That siad, the circulation is not as organized as we all thought based upon the QS pass
senorpepr wrote:As for the drier air, that's wraping around the northeast quad of the center. Derek, what is your thoughts on intensity based on satellite presentation? We just did a rough guess here and are leaning more toward the T3.5 that SAB is saying. 55KT for the 03Z advisory?
dixiebreeze wrote:Does anyone think Recon might move up its surveillance schedule to Monday instead of Tuesday? My hunch is yes.
MiamiensisWx wrote:I believe QuikSCAT should not be utilized as the sole method and standard for detecting a LLC associated with a well developed TC. TRMM scans and NRL data clearly indicate a closed low level circulation.
senorpepr wrote:
The latest F-16 shot doesn't show it, but F-17 just before it and the previous F-16 shot shows a slightly elongated central region (not the core, or "eye", but the central region of the storm). Then again, that could be because of the tilting.
As for the drier air, that's wraping around the northeast quad of the center. Derek, what is your thoughts on intensity based on satellite presentation? We just did a rough guess here and are leaning more toward the T3.5 that SAB is saying. 55KT for the 03Z advisory?
MiamiensisWx wrote:MiamiensisWx wrote:I believe QuikSCAT should not be utilized as the sole method and standard for detecting a LLC associated with a well developed TC. TRMM scans and NRL data clearly indicate a closed low level circulation.
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc08/ATL/02L.BERTHA/tc_ssmis/composite/20080706.2226.f16.x.composite.02LBERTHA.45kts-1000mb-178N-462W.82pc.jpg
The scan on the lower left corner is particularly supportive of my view.
brunota2003 wrote:Wow...tonights QS pass is a tad off it's rocker or something!
wxman57 wrote:brunota2003 wrote:Wow...tonights QS pass is a tad off it's rocker or something!
QS can't see through rain, so it does a poor job at finding the center of better-organized storms many times. It couldn't locate Katrina's center very well when Katrina was a cat 5 with a giant eye.
Code: Select all
SHEAR (KTS) 12 9 10 11 15 17 11 20 20 24 9 4 3
Mecklenburg wrote:but soon she will encounter heavy shear as she approach north of hispaniola, like what the NHC says...
cycloneye wrote:The most shear value will be 24kts at 84 hours but drops bigtime after that.Code: Select all
SHEAR (KTS) 12 9 10 11 15 17 11 20 20 24 9 4 3
tolakram wrote:
00:15 - further north.
Please note the time of the pic if you want to dispute it.
Question, the yellow circle in this image, is that predicted position or some analysis of the position of the LLC?
Archived images here:
http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/product ... r=AL022008
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests