ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#541 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:00 am

Slightly less agressive TWO compared to about 12hrs, still expected to become a TD soon but not quite as quickly as was first expected.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands (TCFA)

#542 Postby Blown Away » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:01 am

The structure looks much better than yesterday all we need is more deep convection and we have a TD. All the conditions are there for 94L to develop. Still moving WNW. I think TD by 5pm or 11pm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#543 Postby Chacor » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:04 am

Nitpicking here, but the thread title is misleading. It says "Invest 94: TD later today or tomorrow", but there's no guarantee of this happening. The TWO only says could become a TD today or tomorrow.

I realise that it most likely will, but as always in the tropics, you can never be sure.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#544 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:07 am

Agreed BA but ther eis no certainty that deep convection will reform we just have to wait and see with this one, if it does re-develop deep convection then its very likely going to get upgraded but right now thats a little bit away it seems.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#545 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:10 am

Yeah, the structure does look good, but it is the lacking convection that has me a bit worried. I am also a bit confused at why the GFS has dropped this system, and could that mean something? Though I still think 94L will eventually develop into a decent system, I always have Chris 2006 hanging in the back of my mind. Like 94L, Chris was a very hyped storm that we all went crazy over. In the end though, Chris never really met any of our expectations, and he fooled everyone as he suddenly died. Will 94L suddenly die too after all this excitement? Or will 94L re-develop convection and continue on the journey we all expected yesterday? I guess we will just have to wait and find out...
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#546 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:11 am

As more visible images come in the Circulation is very clear to see. the center is about 41.5 west by 12 north.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#547 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:11 am

Ouch, that TWO hurts some people that were calling this a TD last night, :wink:
Last night it was very apparent that the defined circulation was only in the ML, with still a broad surface circulation, otherwise the convection will had never died had the LLC being in place.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#548 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:14 am

Derek believes that because the models have a very broad region of Voricity the models aren't developing this very much. We have to wait and see what happens.

Convection does need to develop again if it is to keep the decent structure it started to form recently. Circulation still very evident as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#549 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:15 am

The lack of convection this morning, shows that the LLC may be too weak or disorganized to sustained it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re:

#550 Postby Vortex » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 am

Extremeweatherguy wrote:Yeah, the structure does look good, but it is the lacking convection that has me a bit worried. I am also a bit confused at why the GFS has dropped this system, and could that mean something? Though I still think 94L will eventually develop into a decent system, I always have Chris 2006 hanging in the back of my mind. Like 94L, Chris was a very hyped storm that we all went crazy over. In the end though, Chris never really met any of our expectations, and he fooled everyone as he suddenly died. Will 94L suddenly die too after all this excitement? Or will 94L re-develop convection and continue on the journey we all expected yesterday? I guess we will just have to wait and find out...


the GFS for days has indicated development and in fact nailed the formation of low pressure once again nearly a week out..The last 2 runs show little or no development-correct-. However, if your looking for development I wouldn't be overly concerned on the latest GFS trends..I've seen this scenario happen several times over the years... If we didn't have a developing system which we do and/or the conditions environmentally were hostile which is not the case then I'd give the latest GFS latest runs more credence. For now i'm dismissing the trend on the 00z/6Z runs..Still expecting a Hurricane for the islands..
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#551 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 am

I think the problem is thunder the LLC is pretty elongated, Qscat showed that really nicely with it stretched W-E, it wasn't very circular at all.

Development is still quite likely but its got to tighten that LLC up into a better shape before it can push on, I remember a EPAC invest this year had the same issue and took nearly 3 days to become a TD because of that.
Last edited by KWT on Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#552 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:17 am

This thing is just getting ready to blossom..Its structure is there and i see a much more consolidated structure to it this morning...All this fluxuation(delay in dev) did IMO was get this into the Carribean rather than north of it..
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#553 Postby Blown Away » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:22 am

I think 94L is working to break away from the ITCZ rate now and in a few hours at WNW 94L will break away and take a few gulps of those warm SST's and start to build. If 94L remains 94L then it will run W as a shallow system and I think that's what the models are doing rate now, once 94L becomes Cristobal he will find the weakness left by Bertha and move WNW to NW towards the NE Caribbean.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#554 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:25 am

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8conv.html

MAJOR PROBLEM!!!

There is no low level convergence

Right now, environmental conditions are unfavorable for this to develop (you must first have the favorable lower levels before the upper levels matter)
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#555 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:25 am

Maybe BA there is quite a strong upper high to the N/NW of this system currently so I will be surprised if it lifts up much at all from where it is now, W/WNW track looking the best guide right now for a little while.

Interestingly this does appear to be track more to the WNW then many models were expecting this early...model tracks shifting westwards but I think PR/Hispaniola needs to watch this so closely, thats the main risk still IMO.

Derek, how long would that take to sort out?
0 likes   

User avatar
caribepr
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 10:43 pm
Location: Culebra, PR 18.33 65.33

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of Windward Islands

#556 Postby caribepr » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:28 am

cycloneye wrote:
wxman57 wrote:You guys know me, I'm not one to jump on development potential whenever I see a cumulus cloud in the tropics. But I do think that this system has a good chance of becoming Cristobal this week. It's more than 24 hours away from a depression, probably 48 hours or more, but it's slowly organizing. As I look at the environment in its path I see considerable weakness in the ridge to its north as it nears the Caribbean. This should allow it to gain significant latitude over the coming days. I'd discard the current BAM runs taking into South America. They don't look realistic at all.

I think that the northeast Caribbean islands would be at greatest risk by Friday. Thereafter, we'll have to see just how weak the ridge to the north is and how strong Cristobal becomes (I've already created a Cristobal folder for my 2009 hurricane talks and I'm saving all images of this system there) by the time it reaches 60W. With Bertha still hanging around near Bermuda in 4-5 days, this might allow 94L to track more WNW-NW after reaching the NE Caribbean. Question is, does high pressure build in to its north, blocking it and shoving it west or does it take a path similar to Bertha but more west? My initial thought is the latter. Similar path to Bertha but more west before the turn north. I certainly wouldn't rule out an east coast threat at this point, but with the Bermuda high now so weak west of 60W I'm thinking a Gulf threat is not very likely.


I am reposting the great analysis from one of our pro mets wxman57 for those who haved not read it as it was posted late this morning.mj,these are the kind of posts that you want to see.


Luis, exacto!! wxman57, thank you - we're paying attention!
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re:

#557 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:35 am

Derek Ortt wrote:http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8conv.html

MAJOR PROBLEM!!!

There is no low level convergence

Right now, environmental conditions are unfavorable for this to develop (you must first have the favorable lower levels before the upper levels matter)


I agree Derek, I pointed that out last night also, a good reason why convection died out earlier this morning near the MLC.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re:

#558 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:35 am

Derek Ortt wrote:http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8conv.html

MAJOR PROBLEM!!!

There is no low level convergence

Right now, environmental conditions are unfavorable for this to develop (you must first have the favorable lower levels before the upper levels matter)


I also don't see any LLC on visible loop from the NHC floater. Looks like there maybe some turning in clouds, but they appear to be at mid-level.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#559 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:37 am

The LL Convergence has changed a lot from yesterday.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#560 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:39 am

Image
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests