ATL: Tropical Depression Edouard

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
hwego7

#601 Postby hwego7 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:05 pm

DISTURBANCE FIVE (AL052008) 20080803 1800 UTC


30kts...TD
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#602 Postby Bailey1777 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:05 pm

Aside from wind speed, what direction is this headed and at what speed?
0 likes   

americanrebel

Re: ATL: Invest 91L- Gulf of Mexico

#603 Postby americanrebel » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:06 pm

Right now I would go with a Tropical Storm Watch from Grand Isle to Galveston right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#604 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:06 pm

AL, 05, 2008080318, , BEST, 0, 283N, 880W, 30, 1009, TD,
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#605 Postby RL3AO » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:07 pm

NHC don't need no stinkin' VDM.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#606 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:07 pm

Yep upgraded to tropical Depression 5 now that we have a closed LLC, not really all that surprising it was upgraded.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#607 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:07 pm

hwego7 wrote:DISTURBANCE FIVE (AL052008) 20080803 1800 UTC


30kts...TD



yep

http://asp1.sbs.ohio-state.edu/tropical ... 032006.txt
0 likes   

hwego7

#608 Postby hwego7 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:08 pm

As I thought they would...NHC viewed the SFMR readings as unrepresentative of the storms true intensity given the lack of deep convection directly over the LLC.

The discussion will be interesting to read to see how they inform the public of their decision despite the recon data.
Last edited by hwego7 on Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 91L- Gulf of Mexico

#609 Postby lrak » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:08 pm

I always hear the NE side of a storm is the nasty side, yet Dolly's SW side seemed to produce the most rain and wind damage. Does the angle of approach affect that saying? NE side is the worst?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 91L- Gulf of Mexico

#610 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:10 pm

Shear has dropped of to near nothing
Image
and
mid level shear is also decreasing
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#611 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:10 pm

hwego7, the discussion will probably mention the higher SFMR and say that the estimate may be conservative IMO.

Doubt this will strengthen all that quickly but wouldn't take much for this to be a TS from where it is right now.

Aric, yep shear decreasing but main problem always has been that mid level dry air.
0 likes   

User avatar
vaffie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:11 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re:

#612 Postby vaffie » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:12 pm

HURAKAN wrote:AL, 05, 2008080318, , BEST, 0, 283N, 880W, 30, 1009, TD,


Wasn't that two hours ago, though--before the recon data? It's already 20:12Z, and that was as of 18Z.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 91L- Gulf of Mexico

#613 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:12 pm

lrak wrote:I always hear the NE side of a storm is the nasty side, yet Dolly's SW side seemed to produce the most rain and wind damage. Does the angle of approach affect that saying? NE side is the worst?


actually yes its well normally the right front quadrant. but sometimes other quads will have higher winds do to the others being rain free.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#614 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:14 pm

NRL now shows 05L.NONAME, so it should be a TD at 4 pm.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#615 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:14 pm

Image

NRL: 05L.NONAME
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 91L- Gulf of Mexico

#616 Postby lrak » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:14 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
lrak wrote:I always hear the NE side of a storm is the nasty side, yet Dolly's SW side seemed to produce the most rain and wind damage. Does the angle of approach affect that saying? NE side is the worst?


actually yes its well normally the right front quadrant. but sometimes other quads will have higher winds do to the others being rain free.


So a Port Lavaca hit may mess with Port Aransas, Aransas Pass, Portland, and Corpus Christi perhaps?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 91L- Gulf of Mexico

#617 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:14 pm

Now we are starting to see a small increase in convection..

Image
0 likes   

Honeyko

Re: Re:

#618 Postby Honeyko » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:15 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
Honeyko wrote:Buoy 42040 is now reporting 13.6kts E wind, 19.4k gusts. This is in the clear part of the circulation, and not near the center (the buoy is farther north than the tip of the Delta).
Dude...Im going to say this in the least rude way possible. There is no reason for a warning. If the center is 30-35kts, the bands will likely not be as strong as in the core...assuming there are actually bands there eventually, because right now, the north half of the system is totally bare.
Yeah, it's totally bare, and there's a buoy about a hundred miles from the apparent center with winds already gusting out of the east above 20mph. Gulf systems, ans TS windfields in general, can become extraordinarily broad relative to inner cores. Any convective cells shooting around the top this evening, if containing 30kt gusts above background velocity, will manifest as 45-50kts gusts.

As the other poster observed, when a developing system is this close to land, you can't wait until severe conditions are already occurring before issuing a warning. A warning, by definition, is supposed to precede events, not confirm them.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145330
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 91L- Gulf of Mexico

#619 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:15 pm

Code: Select all

TROPICAL CYCLONE FIVE (AL052008) 20080803 1800 UTC



http://asp1.sbs.ohio-state.edu/tropical/guidance/
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#620 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:18 pm

Still got a very linear apperence I see on that IR imagery as well. Still I remember a few storms in the early seasons of 2000 that had a similar look and went on to become hurricanes.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests