Tropical Storm Fay Model Runs

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Derek Ortt

#501 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:09 pm

I'll wait until I see what the MM5 runs say in the morning
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re:

#502 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:10 pm

deltadog03 wrote:Well, we need to see if and when it develops first...Synoptically I would trust the EURO vs the GFS...I will say this tho, if it does develop the happy medium is basically florida.

:eek: :eek: :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Noles2006
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:57 am
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L Model Runs

#503 Postby Noles2006 » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:11 pm

If this one does not develop... it would become one of the bigger busts of recent memory...

Let's hope that happens. We do not need a Cat-4 anywhere near the US Coast (No s***, Sherlock!).
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#504 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:13 pm

not sure if this was mentioned, but UKMET

DROPPED the cyclone in its 12Z run

The GFDL appears to be an outlier here
0 likes   

Mecklenburg

Re: 92L Model Runs=18z GFDL has a cat 4 (121 kts) in Bahamas

#505 Postby Mecklenburg » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:13 pm

i'm not impressed at all with the GFDL's performance this year... let's wait and see, probably it's forecast is just overhyped
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL: Invest 92L Model Runs

#506 Postby MiamiensisWx » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:13 pm

Ivanhater wrote:
Sure...day 5

Day 7..

Pretty hard to bust through that to get to the Carolinas...anyway olympic time..Go usa women gymnastics team go for gold!

Day 5 per 12Z (previous) run:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/12/images/gfs_500_120m.gif

Note that 18Z indicates a MUCH weaker H5 ridge over the Southeast than the 12Z run's day five contours. A slower movement and a stronger TC (coupled with a weaker upper ridge) would likely result in more interaction with the trough exiting the East Coast, allowing a northward track over the Turks and Caicos/Bahamas toward the Carolinas. Remember that many similar systems also featured initial model runs indicating a track over extreme S Florida into the Gulf of Mexico. Overall, when coupled with the seasonal trends, I would lean toward a track over Florida (i.e. Keys/Miami/S tip to Orlando, etc.) or farther east.

I think the Turks and Caicos faces a threat from this system, as it may intensify as it passes over those islands.
0 likes   

User avatar
canetracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 751
Age: 62
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Suburbia New Orleans...Harahan, LA

Re: ATL: Invest 92L Model Runs

#507 Postby canetracker » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:21 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:
Sure...day 5

Day 7..

Pretty hard to bust through that to get to the Carolinas...anyway olympic time..Go usa women gymnastics team go for gold!

Day 5 per 12Z (previous) run:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/carib/gfs/12/images/gfs_500_120m.gif

Note that 18Z indicates a MUCH weaker H5 ridge over the Southeast than the 12Z run's day five contours. A slower movement and a stronger TC (coupled with a weaker upper ridge) would likely result in more interaction with the trough exiting the East Coast, allowing a northward track over the Turks and Caicos/Bahamas toward the Carolinas. Remember that many similar systems also featured initial model runs indicating a track over extreme S Florida into the Gulf of Mexico. Overall, when coupled with the seasonal trends, I would lean toward a track over Florida (i.e. Keys/Miami/S tip to Orlando, etc.) or farther east.

I think the Turks and Caicos faces a threat from this system, as it may intensify as it passes over those islands.


Do you really put that much faith in the 18z run? Aren't the 00 and 12z runs better or at least a few runs of consistency needed for predicting such a change?
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#508 Postby RL3AO » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:26 pm

Derek, why are you so certain of this? If it doesn't develop any convection tonight, that means it can't develop in the next six days it has over 28C water?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#509 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:27 pm

do not put some much emphasis on SST

If SST were everything, the Carib would crank out cat 5's twice a week.

I'm less than impressed with its SURFACE structure and its atmospheric conditions.

For the record, I did not do the outlook tonight... I was running 3-4K instead
0 likes   

User avatar
Jam151
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:09 pm

Re:

#510 Postby Jam151 » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:28 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:not sure if this was mentioned, but UKMET

DROPPED the cyclone in its 12Z run

The GFDL appears to be an outlier here


The new UKMET isn't all that much different from prior runs. It shows gradual intensification beyond a few days, but it's slower in this run because there is more land interaction with Cuba.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re:

#511 Postby MiamiensisWx » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:33 pm

KWT wrote:Yep GFDL moves this NW at the end of the run, would really worry alot of Floridians...

You mean Bahamians and Carolinians...
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: Invest 92L Model Runs

#512 Postby Bocadude85 » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:40 pm

If this was to develop I find it hard to believe it would plow through that ridge.. more likely it would be a gradual turn NW through the spine of Florida entering lets say near Aventura and heading up the spine of the state.
0 likes   

jaxfladude
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1249
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Fla

Re: ATL: Invest 92L Model Runs

#513 Postby jaxfladude » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:43 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:Actually, the progged heading suggests a threat north of south FL in the 18Z GFDL run...

This trend may indicate the operational 18Z GFS is "delaying" the building H5-H85 ridging, allowing (stronger) 92L to move toward the Carolinas as the trough passes the area.

Personally, I have never anticipated a track significantly farther west than the Florida peninsula and Monroe County Keys. Models have been demonstrating a seasonal bias toward stronger upper level ridging in the medium/long ranges.

I've always believed you can unanimously discount a western/central Gulf threat.


Sorry if wrong thread, but how much north of South Florida?
Central Flroida?
North Florida/my area?
Thanks....

Edit:
Just read latest page... some answers there...
Last edited by jaxfladude on Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#514 Postby Vortex » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:43 pm

system seems poised to make into the heart of the bahamas..Where it goes from there still is fairly uncertain. In terms of strength, I think by tomorrow at this time we will be dealing with a system that is taking on "the look" By late week things may become very interesting..
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: Re:

#515 Postby AJC3 » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:46 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
KWT wrote:Yep GFDL moves this NW at the end of the run, would really worry alot of Floridians...

You mean Bahamians and Carolinians...


Not quite sure I follow your logic about the Carolinas threat. Most of the reliable global guidance, ensemble means, etc. keep strong H50 ridging in place over the western Atlantic through day 7. Where are you seeing the trend toward a big enough breach in the mid level ridge to cause a northward turn?

From the HPC web site...

http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/mdltrend/gfs500.shtml
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayfcst500_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ns_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ff_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ns_wbg.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: Re:

#516 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:49 pm

AJC3 wrote:
MiamiensisWx wrote:
KWT wrote:Yep GFDL moves this NW at the end of the run, would really worry alot of Floridians...

You mean Bahamians and Carolinians...


Not quite sure I follow your logic about the Carolinas threat. Most of the reliable global guidance, ensemble means, etc. keep strong H50 ridging in place over the western Atlantic through day 7. Where are you seeing the trend toward a big enough breach in the mid level ridge to cause a northward turn?

From the HPC web site...

http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/mdltrend/gfs500.shtml
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayfcst500_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ns_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ff_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ns_wbg.gif


I tried to explain this on the last page, no way this goes to the Carolinas with this ridge the models indicate but I gave up cause the olympics are more important :flag:
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: Re:

#517 Postby MiamiensisWx » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:49 pm

AJC3 wrote:Not quite sure I follow your logic about the Carolinas threat. Most of the reliable global guidance, ensemble means, etc. keep strong H50 ridging in place over the western Atlantic through day 7. Where are you seeing the trend toward a big enough breach in the mid level ridge to cause a northward turn?

From the HPC web site...

http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/mdltrend/gfs500.shtml
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayfcst500_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ns_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ff_wbg.gif
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/medr/5dayf ... ns_wbg.gif

I noticed the weaker H5 ridging around day five (compared to 12Z) on the 18Z operational GFS. The GFDL also indicates slower movement of (stronger) 92L, so it would have an opportunity to move north on day five via interaction with the bypassing trough. The average (mean) of the ensembles typically reflects a bias toward stronger ridging/higher heights than the operational GFS. We may see trends toward a weaker SE ridge in the ensembles over the next several days.

I'm not arguing for a Carolinas threat, but I was suggesting the Gulf of Mexico threat may be overplayed.

Do you understand my logic?
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: Re:

#518 Postby AJC3 » Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:05 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote: I noticed the weaker H5 ridging around day five (compared to 12Z) on the 18Z operational GFS. The GFDL also indicates slower movement of (stronger) 92L, so it would have an opportunity to move north on day five via interaction with the bypassing trough. The average (mean) of the ensembles typically reflects a bias toward stronger ridging/higher heights than the operational GFS. We may see trends toward a weaker SE ridge in the ensembles over the next several days.

I'm not arguing for a Carolinas threat, but I was suggesting the Gulf of Mexico threat may be overplayed.

Do you understand my logic?


Eek! I'd be really, really careful about using the intermediate runs (06Z/18Z) for development of any trend unless it's backed up by a trend seen in comparison of 00Z-12Z guidance. Not saying that you'll wind up incorrect this time, however I'm not at all a big fan of the GFS intermediate runs. If the 00Z shows this same trend compared to the 12Z run, then I think you may be onto something.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re:

#519 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:12 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Yes there is a red spot on GFDL indicating Category 4.


Yes that is true, but lets not forget the little red disclaimer at the bottom.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L Model Runs

#520 Postby ronjon » Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:18 pm

I have to agree with AJC3. Major ridging developing at 138 hrs and it only gets stronger and builds west with time - even in the 18Z run. The ECMWF has even stronger ridging. It's no doubt a major pattern change from the last week of an east coast trough. If anything, I think the GFDL is showing a rightward bias - it may be more likely this system gets pushed west through the straits.

Image
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests