
ATL HANNA: Extratropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic
we were looking at this system today and wondering why NHC hadn't put the INVEST 95L tag on it......
painfully obvious of either an MLC or LLC...
If we don't go for 94L there is a good chance of flying 95L or both.
painfully obvious of either an MLC or LLC...
If we don't go for 94L there is a good chance of flying 95L or both.
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic
95L looks like it is curling up in those last frames. Longitude near 40W.
Should get a Floater on the next report.
Should get a Floater on the next report.
0 likes
- GeneratorPower
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1648
- Age: 45
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
- Location: Huntsville, AL
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic
pojo wrote:we were looking at this system today and wondering why NHC hadn't put the INVEST 95L tag on it......
painfully obvious of either an MLC or LLC...
If we don't go for 94L there is a good chance of flying 95L or both.
Looks like you guys will stay busy for quite a while. Of course its not a surprise as its getting into late August.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic
I can't imagine that they would both cause the destruction of the other one, but it is certainly possible that the system that develops first (if either does) would absorb or destroy the laggard.
0 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6091
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re:
Scorpion wrote:I would think that if 94L developed then 95L would wait until it was in the Western Caribbean or Gulf to develop.
I dont know. I think both 94 and 95 can develop. 94 has a pretty small circulation and they appear JUST far enough away from each other not to hinder each other too much. Although 94L could be the reason why theres more shear predicted for 95L than 94L
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in East Atlantic
pojo wrote:we were looking at this system today and wondering why NHC hadn't put the INVEST 95L tag on it......
painfully obvious of either an MLC or LLC...
If we don't go for 94L there is a good chance of flying 95L or both.
I think it's so cool to have an actual hurricane hunter on the board....You guys do a fantastic job by the way, especially considering the everchanging oceanic environments that you have to fly into.
0 likes
Re: Re:
RL3AO wrote:Cyclenall wrote:I was waiting a long time for this to be tagged 95L. It looked awesome yesterday and still looks good today. Will the NHC mention it by 2:00 am?
They tagged it as an invest so there is no reason for them not to mention it.
Shows what I know. No mention in the 2am TWO.
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic
I'm confused... 95L isn't mentioned on the NHC site nor or the Navy tropical weather site.
Who is naming invests?
Who is naming invests?

0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 143866
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic
gerrit wrote:I'm confused... 95L isn't mentioned on the NHC site nor or the Navy tropical weather site.
Who is naming invests?
Maybe a computer malfunction at NRL? Anyway,from ATCF is where all invests are activated and deactivated,all by automated computers.Here is the site from that. By the way NRL still has Isselle there after days of last advisory.
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/atcf_web/index.html
0 likes
Re:
GeneratorPower wrote:I think it's pretty likely NHC had their hands full with Fay and didn't want to begin tracking 95L until they *had* to. Hence the delay.
This issue comes up almost every time there is a named storm and an invest.
I just don't subscribe to the belief that the attention span at the NHC does not allow for multiple systems to be observed and forecasted at once.
I respectfully disagree with that contention.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22951
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: Invest 95L in Central Atlantic
Invest 95L is gone from the MRY web site as an invest. I think they're looking at the wrong area for possible development. 95L is part of a wave axis that extends northward to 20N. 95L is the base of the wave. But it's the top part of the wave that typically breaks off and develops. Yesterday, we could clearly see a large rotation at the "crest" of the wave. Look up near 18N/38W, there is convection firing over the broad LLC now. That's the area to watch for potential development.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests