ATL HANNA: Extratropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re:

#541 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:23 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:upper lows can be poorly forecast by models because there is very little data over the oceans to initialize the models with in the upper levels


What do you think Hannas chances are of making it through this shear?
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: ATL: Tropical Storm Hanna in Central Atlantic

#542 Postby cpdaman » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:25 pm

thanks derek for a serious reply

i was just pointing out what seems to be a weak link in forecasting accuracy and as they say your only as strong as your weakest link, trying to get feed back as to why are there such limitations on forecasting ull and how/what/if PRO forecasters can do to improve on these limitations- i didn't mean to sound like a jerk
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Re:

#543 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:26 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:upper lows can be poorly forecast by models because there is very little data over the oceans to initialize the models with in the upper levels


What do you think Hannas chances are of making it through this shear?


I posed this question in the Tropical Analysis forum just a few minutes ago...

Derek will reply when he gets a chance.
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#544 Postby storms in NC » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:32 pm

How many Storms have hit the US from where Hana is at now?
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

#545 Postby Weatherboy1 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:33 pm

Hanna, we hardly knew ya! :) Just joking. But she sure is getting shredded to bits by this ULL. If that doesn't fill or move soon, I don't see how Hanna survives. Storms can only remain as "naked swirls" for so long before just falling apart.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: Tropical Storm Hanna in Central Atlantic

#546 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:34 pm

I guess this goes to show you how unpredictable weather can be... she looked great this morning and now look at her nothing but a naked LLC
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Tropical Storm Hanna in Central Atlantic

#547 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:37 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:I guess this goes to show you how unpredictable weather can be... she looked great this morning and now look at her nothing but a naked LLC


There is nothing new about it. We have seen it countless times with storms experiencing shear. It's normal for them to look great during DMAX and completely exposed during DMIN. It's not that it's dying or anything close to it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

#548 Postby Weatherboy1 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:38 pm

Of course wasn't there a system about 16 years ago in this general area that was getting shredded by shear ... but then the shear faded ... and then its general NW move was brought to a halt by a ridge ... and then the system was steered almost due W into South Florida? Hmmm.

No I'm not saying that Hanna is Andrew. Just that a lot could happen here. A complete dissipation, or depending on whether she survives, a strong storm heading toward FL or somewhere else in the SE U.S. Just interesting to note the somewhat similar setup.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#549 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:40 pm

Well the key thing is exactly where the ULL is going, they've really got to seperate but even then I think shear is here to stick for a little while yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: Tropical Storm Hanna in Central Atlantic

#550 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:40 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:I guess this goes to show you how unpredictable weather can be... she looked great this morning and now look at her nothing but a naked LLC


There is nothing new about it. We have seen it countless times with storms experiencing shear. It's normal for them to look great during DMAX and completely exposed during DMIN. It's not that it's dying or anything close to it.


I agree with you we saw this with gus just last night.. im sure she will rebound assuming that ULL moves away or fills in.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re:

#551 Postby Category 5 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:41 pm

Weatherboy1 wrote:Of course wasn't there a system about 16 years ago in this general area that was getting shredded by shear ... but then the shear faded ... and then its general NW move was brought to a halt by a ridge ... and then the system was steered almost due W into South Florida? Hmmm.

No I'm not saying that Hanna is Andrew. Just that a lot could happen here. A complete dissipation, or depending on whether she survives, a strong storm heading toward FL or somewhere else in the SE U.S. Just interesting to note the somewhat similar setup.


I have to agree with you, she looks sick now but don't write it off until it dissipates when it has this much time.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#552 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:42 pm

Image

At least there is no discussion about if a LLC exists or not!!!
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38090
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#553 Postby Brent » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:44 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

At least there is no discussion about if a LLC exists or not!!!


:roflmao:

Refreshing change from Dolly and Fay. :P
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

#554 Postby Weatherboy1 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:46 pm

For those interested in a little hurricane history (and to see why I even bring up the possible parallel/similar set up -- though I am certainly NOT saying Hanna will ever turn into an Andrew clone)

Between the 17th and 20th of August, the tropical storm passed south of the center of the high pressure area over the eastern Atlantic. Steering currents carried Andrew closer to a strong upper-level low pressure system centered about 500 n mi to the east-southeast of Bermuda and to a trough that extended southward from the low for a few hundred miles. These currents gradually changed and Andrew decelerated on a course which became northwesterly. This change in heading spared the Lesser Antilles from an encounter with Andrew. The change in track also brought the tropical storm into an environment of strong southwesterly vertical wind shear and quite high surface pressures to its north. Although the estimated maximum wind speed of Andrew varied little then, a rather remarkable evolution occurred.

Satellite images suggest that Andrew produced deep convection only sporadically for several days, mainly in several bursts of about 12 hours duration. Also, the deep convection did not persist. Instead, it was stripped away from the low-level circulation by the strong southwesterly flow at upper levels. Air Force Reserve unit reconnaissance aircraft investigated Andrew and, on the 20th, found that the cyclone had degenerated to the extent that only a diffuse low-level circulation center remained. Andrew's central pressure rose considerably (Fig. 2 [87K GIF]). Nevertheless, the flight-level data indicated that Andrew retained a vigorous circulation aloft. Wind speeds near 70 kt were measured at an altitude of 1500 ft near a convective band lying to the northeast of the low-level center. Hence, Andrew is estimated on 20 August to have been a tropical storm with 40 kt surface winds and an astonishingly high central pressure of 1015 mb (Figs. 2 and 3 [87K GIF]).

Significant changes in the large-scale environment near and downstream from Andrew began by 21 August. Satellite imagery in the water vapor channel indicated that the low aloft to the east-southeast of Bermuda weakened and split. The bulk of the low opened into a trough which retreated northward. That evolution decreased the vertical wind shear over Andrew. The remainder of the low dropped southward to a position just southwest of Andrew where its circulation enhanced the upper-level outflow over the tropical storm. At the same time, a strong and deep high pressure cell formed near the U.S. southeast coast. A ridge built eastward from the high into the southwestern Atlantic with its axis lying just north of Andrew. The associated steering flow over the tropical storm became easterly. Andrew turned toward the west, accelerated to near 16 kt, and quickly intensified.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re:

#555 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:53 pm

Weatherboy1 wrote:For those interested in a little hurricane history (and to see why I even bring up the possible parallel/similar set up -- though I am certainly NOT saying Hanna will ever turn into an Andrew clone)

Between the 17th and 20th of August, the tropical storm passed south of the center of the high pressure area over the eastern Atlantic. Steering currents carried Andrew closer to a strong upper-level low pressure system centered about 500 n mi to the east-southeast of Bermuda and to a trough that extended southward from the low for a few hundred miles. These currents gradually changed and Andrew decelerated on a course which became northwesterly. This change in heading spared the Lesser Antilles from an encounter with Andrew. The change in track also brought the tropical storm into an environment of strong southwesterly vertical wind shear and quite high surface pressures to its north. Although the estimated maximum wind speed of Andrew varied little then, a rather remarkable evolution occurred.

Satellite images suggest that Andrew produced deep convection only sporadically for several days, mainly in several bursts of about 12 hours duration. Also, the deep convection did not persist. Instead, it was stripped away from the low-level circulation by the strong southwesterly flow at upper levels. Air Force Reserve unit reconnaissance aircraft investigated Andrew and, on the 20th, found that the cyclone had degenerated to the extent that only a diffuse low-level circulation center remained. Andrew's central pressure rose considerably (Fig. 2 [87K GIF]). Nevertheless, the flight-level data indicated that Andrew retained a vigorous circulation aloft. Wind speeds near 70 kt were measured at an altitude of 1500 ft near a convective band lying to the northeast of the low-level center. Hence, Andrew is estimated on 20 August to have been a tropical storm with 40 kt surface winds and an astonishingly high central pressure of 1015 mb (Figs. 2 and 3 [87K GIF]).

Significant changes in the large-scale environment near and downstream from Andrew began by 21 August. Satellite imagery in the water vapor channel indicated that the low aloft to the east-southeast of Bermuda weakened and split. The bulk of the low opened into a trough which retreated northward. That evolution decreased the vertical wind shear over Andrew. The remainder of the low dropped southward to a position just southwest of Andrew where its circulation enhanced the upper-level outflow over the tropical storm. At the same time, a strong and deep high pressure cell formed near the U.S. southeast coast. A ridge built eastward from the high into the southwestern Atlantic with its axis lying just north of Andrew. The associated steering flow over the tropical storm became easterly. Andrew turned toward the west, accelerated to near 16 kt, and quickly intensified.


That synopsis is quite scary and eerily familar!!! :double:

SFT
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#556 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:56 pm

I hate to say it but this situation is very similar to Andrew with the synoptic setup that may happen :uarrow:

But I think in this case the steering patterns downstream are still a bit unknown, more so than Andrew.

Let's hope South Florida never has to deal with an Andrew storm from the east ever again.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re:

#557 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:00 pm

gatorcane wrote:I hate to say it but this situation is very similar to Andrew with the synoptic setup that may happen :uarrow:

But I think in this case the steering patterns downstream are still a bit unknown, more so than Andrew.

Let's hope South Florida never has to deal with an Andrew storm from the east ever again.


Its only a matter of time until something like Andrew happens again... look at all the big storms that hit south florida from the east back in the 1940's
0 likes   

lbvbl
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:24 am

Re:

#558 Postby lbvbl » Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:02 pm

gatorcane wrote:I hate to say it but this situation is very similar to Andrew with the synoptic setup that may happen :uarrow:

But I think in this case the steering patterns downstream are still a bit unknown, more so than Andrew.

Let's hope South Florida never has to deal with an Andrew storm from the east ever again.


The good thing about this so far is that the forecast models (GFS as an exception) agree on the track thus far. I would much rather have a storm with a certain track becuase surprises are less likely.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#559 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:17 pm

18z Best Track:

AL, 08, 2008082818, , BEST, 0, 206N, 596W, 35, 1003, TS,
0 likes   

Broward Mom
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:52 am
Location: One mile from Alligator Alley eastern toll plaza

Re: ATL: Tropical Storm Hanna in Central Atlantic

#560 Postby Broward Mom » Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:18 pm

I just know I'm going to be p.o.'ed beyond belief if both Gustav and Hanna are (let's say) Cat 3's and hit less than a week apart. Our people will have no national news coverage and MUCH worse, no sympathy or emotional support since Katrina...er, I mean Gustav...will have stolen the spotlight with his accompanying flood.

We will not exist, just like after Oct. 24, 2005, and every day thereafter. (Including today when the major outlet I am watching hasn't said "Hanna" in the past hour I've had it on.)

Sorry if I sound bitter. I just am. Spending a few hours in a tiny bathroom with your family and big dog under a mattress will do that to you (after you've seen 2 shutters peeling from your windows).

And for the people who didn't understand why you'd start preparing today? The "before people know about it" is the important part - gotta get my RT-600 (roof tile adhesive) and two-ton epoxy to firm up some of our anchors. Stores will be empty if another one is coming - we're South Floridians, trust us, we know.

Thanks to everyone as always on this forum - now I know it's not just me that hates the incompetence of TWC! :)
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests