DESTRUCTION5 wrote:18z GFDL right over NO
Of course it is. I think you been predicting that with every GFDL run.
It's about time you get right.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:18z GFDL right over NO
Stormcenter wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:18z GFDL right over NO
Of course it is. I think you been predicting that with every GFDL run.
It's about time you get right.
swimaster20 wrote:Just for clarification, the 18z GFDL is not "right over" New Orleans, it shows landfall in Terrebonne Parish while moving northwest. Although New Orleans is on the east side, it isn't a direct hit.
wxman57 wrote:Throw out the BAMs, they won't see the changing steering flow in the Gulf as the high builds west across Florida and the upper low moves west. Here's what you get. Farthest east is NOGAPS (near Baton Rouge). GFDL is just east of Vermilion Bay, right over Lafayette. UKMET is off on its own in moving Gustav way too slowly and turning it back out into the Gulf. Left outliers are the Navy version of the GFDL and the NAM. All reliable models are between Lafayette and Baton Rouge. NHC track is there, too, about 1/3 of the way between Lafayette and Baton Rouge.
Ptarmigan wrote:I wonder if Gustav could become a rain event for Texas?
Ivanhater wrote:FWIW 00z bams shifted even further east..NHC light blue line
Stormcenter wrote:It looks like Gustav has taken a little westward jog recently.
Stormcenter wrote:It looks like Gustav has taken a little westward jog recently.
gboudx wrote:Stormcenter wrote:It looks like Gustav has taken a little westward jog recently.
jeff also mentioned not to watch the wobbles or stair-stepping. You must assess the motion over a 3-6 hour time period. Not sure you are wobble-watching, but just an fyi.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests