ATL GUSTAV: Tropical Depression - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
bigjohn
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:00 pm

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8521 Postby bigjohn » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:56 pm

SoupBone wrote:
soonertwister wrote:A ship 150 nm due North of Gustav reported 60 kt sustained winds and 46 foot waves a little over a half hour ago.

:eek:

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/radial_search.php?storm=at2



Ummmm....46 foot waves? WOW! Were any waves like this recorded for Katrina. This seems very high. :eek:


I work for an oil company that had wave instrumentation on the structure as part of a met program in conjunction with the MMS. The instrument broke after reading wave heights during Katrina of up to 86 feet.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#8522 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:57 pm

BigB0882, he may also just not know the true facts I suppose :?: Eeither way its worked a treat and thats what matters.

Also there is certainly a real chance that shear remains a problem and doesn't ease quickly enough for Gustav to take advantage of that, however with such explosive convection may only need 3-6hrs.
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8523 Postby HurricaneRobert » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:57 pm

Crap I thought it was weakening, but that's a huge blowup in the past couple of hours. Yesterday it had hurricane-force winds about as far as Rita, but now its a little smaller?
0 likes   

User avatar
VeniceInlet
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 10:12 pm
Location: Nokomis, FL

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8524 Postby VeniceInlet » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:57 pm

Sabanic wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Very Windy across Florida's peninsula.

Sustained Tropical Storm Force Winds Reaching Tampa Bay:
http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstat ... ?ID=MNP165
Saint Petersburg: East 39 mph, Gusts 46 mph


Very Windy across Florida's Peninsula in the Tampa Bay Area:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstat ... KFLCLEAR25
East 23 mph Gust 42 mph Clearwater Beach

Tampa Bay: E36 Gusts 47 mph
http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstat ... ?ID=MC6730


Wow TBH! If you guys are getting that there really makes me a bit more concerned about what we could possibly get here. I'm only 6 miles from Mobile Bay


I find this report very surprising. I'm just sixty miles south of Tampa, 1/2 mile inland from the Gulf, and we've barely had a breeze. We've had 3" of rain since yesterday.

Everybody stay safe.
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re:

#8525 Postby Buck » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:58 pm

RainWind wrote:Local met just stated that there is a possibility that this storm will continue to have problems due to shear, and that we may not get as much as we thought and that was good news for southeast La. Is this right? Should we start to feel some relief? RW


Sounds like either a bad met or just a foolish one.
0 likes   

User avatar
LSU2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1711
Age: 57
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Cut Off, Louisiana

Re: Re:

#8526 Postby LSU2001 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:59 pm

BigB0882 wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:Ts Force Winds out 200 miles, big storm.


It is almost big as Katrina.


According to Nagin, this storm is "twice as large as Katrina." No, I am not kidding, he really said that. :roll:


Nagin has been saying that but he also is saying the "footprint" in LA. I think what he means is that with the angle of attack, Gus will move over much, much more of La. If that is what he means then he is correct. The path of this storm will cause damage over a much larger portion of La. than Katrina did.
Tim
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8527 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:00 pm

bigjohn wrote:
I work for an oil company that had wave instrumentation on the structure as part of a met program in conjunction with the MMS. The instrument broke after reading wave heights during Katrina of up to 86 feet.


Since 86 foot waves were measured in Katrina and broke. It would not surprise me if Katrina produced waves as high as +120 feet waves. :eek:
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: Re:

#8528 Postby rtd2 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:01 pm

BigB0882 wrote:
Ptarmigan wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:Ts Force Winds out 200 miles, big storm.


It is almost big as Katrina.


According to Nagin, this storm is "twice as large as Katrina." No, I am not kidding, he really said that. :roll:






Over footprint? maybe....WIND FIELD IN MILES NOT EVEN CLOSE! ...SO FAR thats the key! it aint over
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8529 Postby Wx_Warrior » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:01 pm

I was told to scrap models this close to landfall....who knows?
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: Re:

#8530 Postby cpdaman » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:01 pm

Buck wrote:
RainWind wrote:Local met just stated that there is a possibility that this storm will continue to have problems due to shear, and that we may not get as much as we thought and that was good news for southeast La. Is this right? Should we start to feel some relief? RW


Sounds like either a bad met or just a foolish one.


sounds to me that most people can't understand what possibly means
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#8531 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:02 pm

Buck wrote:
Sounds like either a bad met or just a foolish one.


Hard to say at this time, the shear may indeed not weaken and hold up till after landfall, equally it could ease off in the next few hours and give this system another 12hrs over warm waters with very decent conditions and could well make it to the forecasted strength.

Right now still too early to say.
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

Re: Re:

#8532 Postby soonertwister » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:02 pm

smw1981 wrote:
ColdFusion wrote:
funster wrote:The NHC's path seems to be right of all the computer models. http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tr ... model.html They must think the models are a little out to lunch.


Remember wxman57's stat from yesterday that in a 10 year study, roughly 75% of Gulf Storms go to the right of the official track.


The only thing that concerns me (for my family and friends in Mobile and on the MGC) is this! My mom and I were talking earlier about Dennis...the NHC track had it hitting Mobile directly the night before it was supposed to hit. My mom had come to stay with me farther inland because my dad refused to leave their river house (stupid, we know...but he is stubborn). That night, my mom and I followed the storm for hours (on S2k!) because we were so worried. It ended up jogging east at the last second and hit between Santa Rosa Island and Navarre beach (a good 2 hour car ride from Mobile), and I don't even remember it raining in Mobile that day lol.

I tried to find these tracks on the archives, but for some reason there are only 9 pages of Dennis advisories. Regardless, we have seen storms do this time and time again (Georges, Ivan, Dennis, etc.), making we wonder if Gus won't do the same. Luckily, MGC has evacuation orders now (finally!), but I just hope people actually heeded the warnings.


You can find a comprehensive summary on Dennis at this page, in both pdf and Word formats.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2005atlan.shtml
0 likes   

bigjohn
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:00 pm

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8533 Postby bigjohn » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:03 pm

These waves were being measure 100 miles offshore if that helps your estimating
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8534 Postby rtd2 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:03 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:I was told to scrap models this close to landfall....who knows?




The models have certainly came into agreement some stacking on top of others...Keep in mind the NHC is just SLIGHTLY different on track than the models so no one is scrapping them
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Re:

#8535 Postby Buck » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:04 pm

cpdaman wrote:
Buck wrote:
RainWind wrote:Local met just stated that there is a possibility that this storm will continue to have problems due to shear, and that we may not get as much as we thought and that was good news for southeast La. Is this right? Should we start to feel some relief? RW


Sounds like either a bad met or just a foolish one.


sounds to me that most people can't understand what possibly means


That's part of it. Television mets need to be especially careful when they are talking about favorable possibilities. Plenty of people who hear something like that might let their guard down.
0 likes   

User avatar
WxGuy1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: Re:

#8536 Postby WxGuy1 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:05 pm

Buck wrote:
RainWind wrote:Local met just stated that there is a possibility that this storm will continue to have problems due to shear, and that we may not get as much as we thought and that was good news for southeast La. Is this right? Should we start to feel some relief? RW


Sounds like either a bad met or just a foolish one.


Why is he a bad or foolish meteorologist? Gustav is having problems with shear (and perhaps now a big chunk of dry air to its west through south). And chances are, Gustav won't be as bad as previously thought. This does NOT mean it'll something to sneeze at, but he's just telling it like it is. Always saying "This is will be the Storm of the Century" is very counterproductive unless it really is "The storm of the century". Overwarning and false alarms can be very bad for warning response (i.e. folks become complacent) in the long term. Heck, that's partially why the original response of people before Katrina was so lacksidaisical -- "Ah, we've been through hurricane warnings before, so I'm sure we'll be fine this time".
0 likes   

User avatar
Buck
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Re:

#8537 Postby Buck » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:08 pm

WxGuy1 wrote:
Buck wrote:
RainWind wrote:Local met just stated that there is a possibility that this storm will continue to have problems due to shear, and that we may not get as much as we thought and that was good news for southeast La. Is this right? Should we start to feel some relief? RW


Sounds like either a bad met or just a foolish one.


Why is he a bad or foolish meteorologist? Gustav is having problems with shear (and perhaps now a big chunk of dry air to its west through south). And chances are, Gustav won't be as bad as previously thought. This does NOT mean it'll something to sneeze at, but he's just telling it like it is. Always saying "This is will be the Storm of the Century" is very counterproductive unless it really is "The storm of the century". Overwarning and false alarms can be very bad for warning response (i.e. folks become complacent) in the long term. Heck, that's partially why the original response of people before Katrina was so lacksidaisical -- "Ah, we've been through hurricane warnings before, so I'm sure we'll be fine this time".


See my post above. I'm not saying that what he said isn't true... I just think the more caution, the better with on-air meteorologists.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#8538 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:09 pm

Keep in mind the storm is STILL moving slightly East of the NHC's track...and has consistently done so since this time yesterday.


At this point the storm would have to make an unreasonably hard left turn to follow what the models are saying. The way I am currently seeing it, if the storm does make a left shift...it will only follow the NHC track..or perhaps slightly to the west of it. Otherwise the storm is moving too fast to allow the ridge to turn it away.


This is of course, my opinion (i'd hope that needs not explanation). So take my next comment as such as well- Scrap the latest model run. I don't expect to see the same thing for the next run.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#8539 Postby dhweather » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:10 pm

With the outflow restricted to the west and south, the dry air, I am beginning to think that Gus won't make it to category 4 before landfall. If we are lucky, maybe he'll drop to a 2.



The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8540 Postby cpdaman » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:12 pm

CNN met just made a good comment IMO that with a storm moving at the speed gustav is it will not just "explode" as it hit's the loop current, because sometimes there can be a bit (assuming 2 or so hours) of a lag effect

so i would look to see over the next two hours if this lag effect kicks in (and not write off intensification in any way, shape, or form just yet) , since she is on the very nothern extreme of the loop current now and leaving it in the next hour or two
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests