ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#461 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:53 pm

Just Joshing You wrote:If that is from 2hr30m ago, then it is definitely closed off now.


I agree. Ike is getting better organized by the minute.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL 09L.IKE - Discussion

#462 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:53 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
Just Joshing You
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nova Scotia

#463 Postby Just Joshing You » Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:56 pm

And it's still twice as large as Tracy - at least!
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

Re: ATL 09L.IKE - Discussion

#464 Postby Vortex » Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:56 pm

This has the potential to become a very strong hurricane...Compact for now which often allows these smaller storms to ramp up very quick.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#465 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Sep 02, 2008 5:59 pm

Yea, small storms can develop really quickly, but on the flipside, they also can be disrupted much more easily by shear(which I think the last discussion mentioned), and of course if it travel over land..
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#466 Postby fasterdisaster » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:00 pm

I don't think compact storms weaken faster over land than big ones? I could be wrong I just have never heard or seen this.
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#467 Postby Vortex » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:03 pm

Like a comet coming out of left field...
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#468 Postby Stormcenter » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:05 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:I don't think compact storms weaken faster over land than big ones? I could be wrong I just have never heard or seen this.



I believe they do weaken quicker then larger systems.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#469 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:06 pm

Does look very good indeed though that suggests the eyewall is still open but that doesn't matter a huge deal this probably is still around 65kts now and I fully expect the NHC will go ahead and upgrade and show it as a major as well at the end of the advisory.
0 likes   

User avatar
Just Joshing You
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nova Scotia

Re:

#470 Postby Just Joshing You » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:08 pm

KWT wrote:Does look very good indeed though that suggests the eyewall is still open but that doesn't matter a huge deal this probably is still around 65kts now and I fully expect the NHC will go ahead and upgrade and show it as a major as well at the end of the advisory.


That microwave pass was from 2 hrs 30 mins before the eye opened.
0 likes   

User avatar
Annie Oakley
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Texas

Re:

#471 Postby Annie Oakley » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:30 pm

Vortex wrote:Like a comet coming out of left field...

So beautiful already lol......I dontknow how NHC or all of the great ones here at Storm2k can keep up with all these systems-what a challenge. Makes these hot summer daze go by so fast.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#472 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:40 pm

JJY, I was refering to the IR imagery which showed a region of very weak convection on the southern side, thats probably where the gap was but I'm fully expecting that gap is filling as we speak.

No doubt in my mind this is a hurricane now...
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL 09L.IKE - Discussion

#473 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:56 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#474 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:02 pm

Looking at that tolakram the center is as about 285 for the long term motion but I suspect the center has jogged to the WNW..either that or the eye has set-up further north then the NHC estimated, that may be the more likely answer I suppose.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#475 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:13 pm

It doesn't look fully closed yet to me. I'd say 60 kt right now.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: ATL 09L.IKE - Discussion

#476 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:20 pm

I strongly disagree, this looks better then Gustav was through 90% of its time over the gulf of Mexico. 1# 90% closed eye, that is clear 2# red eywall. I would say 70 knots.

Image
Last edited by Matt-hurricanewatcher on Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#477 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:21 pm

Hmm I think its borderline, I have to agree I'm not sure its got a totally closed eyewall butr the convection on the northern side is deep and its well wrapped around a pretty obvious eye even on the vis imagery, suggest to me maybe minimal cat-1, I'll split the difference and say 65kts :D
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re:

#478 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:24 pm

KWT wrote:Hmm I think its borderline, I have to agree I'm not sure its got a totally closed eyewall butr the convection on the northern side is deep and its well wrapped around a pretty obvious eye even on the vis imagery, suggest to me maybe minimal cat-1, I'll split the difference and say 65kts :D




I would of said north of Cuba..In which Gustav looked to be around 80 knots based on IR,,,that he was mostly around 70-75 knots. With maybe 75 knots at landfall. But looks are not everything. I believe this is 70 knots.

Of course Gustav was a major for most of that time, and just under that at landfall. I also believe this could become a major.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL 09L.IKE - Discussion

#479 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:28 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145309
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL 09L.IKE - Discussion

#480 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:29 pm

No Hurricane yet according to BEST TRACK at 00:00 UTC: Winds remain at 55kts.

AL, 09, 2008090300, , BEST, 0, 197N, 472W, 55, 996, TS,
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest