ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Re:

#1881 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:43 pm

gtsmith wrote:
gatorcane wrote:well I don't see the NHC shifting the track much north or south at all for the 11PM EST advisory looking at the model consensus tonight.


might they move the end point closer to landfall though...or leave it where it is


guess we'll find out soon enough....
0 likes   

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1882 Postby AtlanticWind » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:43 pm

artist wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Recurve wrote:MiamiensisWx -- what is TVCN, been trying to find out.

GFDL didn't shift much at all, did it -- it's been the cuba coast track for a few runs I thought.


Variable Consensus of AVNI, EGRI, NGPI, GHMI, HWRI, and EMXI
Hanna seems to be at her 06 utc point now. If I am reading it correctly, how could this affect Ike's future track or will it? Thanks for assisting us here and helping keep us sane! :cheesy:[/quote
I thought that too .was wondering if I was misreading something.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1883 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:44 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Recurve wrote:MiamiensisWx -- what is TVCN, been trying to find out.

GFDL didn't shift much at all, did it -- it's been the cuba coast track for a few runs I thought.


Variable Consensus of AVNI, EGRI, NGPI, GHMI, HWRI, and EMXI

afm i plead ignorance here, what is variable about consensus?


A forecaster can add more weight to one model...or throw a bad one out.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145677
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1884 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:49 pm

From 11 PM Advisory days 4-5 forecast points:

EXTENDED OUTLOOK. NOTE...ERRORS FOR TRACK HAVE AVERAGED NEAR 225 NM
ON DAY 4 AND 300 NM ON DAY 5...AND FOR INTENSITY NEAR 20 KT EACH DAY

OUTLOOK VALID 09/0000Z 24.0N 77.0W
MAX WIND 110 KT...GUSTS 135 KT.

OUTLOOK VALID 10/0000Z 26.0N 80.0W
MAX WIND 110 KT...GUSTS 135 KT.

REQUEST FOR 3 HOURLY SHIP REPORTS WITHIN 300 MILES OF 23.6N 59.5W

NEXT ADVISORY AT 05/0900Z
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7185
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1885 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:51 pm

artist wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
Recurve wrote:MiamiensisWx -- what is TVCN, been trying to find out.

GFDL didn't shift much at all, did it -- it's been the cuba coast track for a few runs I thought.


Variable Consensus of AVNI, EGRI, NGPI, GHMI, HWRI, and EMXI
Hanna seems to be at her 06 utc point now. If I am reading it correctly, how could this affect Ike's future track or will it? Thanks for assisting us here and helping keep us sane! :cheesy:


you are correct and it will be south of that 06 point and looks to be moving S of W now and could easily miss its next point to the S
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38101
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1886 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:52 pm

Image
Last edited by Brent on Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1887 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:52 pm

landfall in the nhc 11pm track
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1888 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:53 pm

5day forecast point landfall in Miami

But its prudent to focus on the cone and not the line this far out.
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
NativeFloridaGirl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:07 am
Location: In Exile In Lower Alabama

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1889 Postby NativeFloridaGirl » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:53 pm

Can someone explain this part of the 11p discussion:

THE TRACK GUIDANCE IS IN TWO DISTINCT BRANCHES...THE GFS...NOGAPS...AND UKMET SHOW THE TURN OCCURRING OVER THE BAHAMAS....WHILE THE HWRF...GFDL...AND ECMWF TAKE IKE OVER CUBA OR THE STRAITS OF FLORIDA.

Does that mean it will either go south of Florida or East of Florida, but they're sure it won't hit Florida? :?: :?:

~Beth~
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1890 Postby artist » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:54 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:landfall in the nhc 11pm track

actually just short of landfall.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38101
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1891 Postby Brent » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:54 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Canelaw99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2127
Age: 48
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Homestead, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1892 Postby Canelaw99 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:55 pm

Actually, I used Google Earth to plot the 5 day point, and it's still offshore...offshore between Hollywood and Hallandale. I don't know how to post pics from google earth to here, but maybe someone could plot the lat and long given in the NHC 11 pm advisory and post the pic....
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1893 Postby CronkPSU » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:55 pm

Brent wrote:Image


well that would certainly be worst case scenario
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1894 Postby Sabanic » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:55 pm

NativeFloridaGirl wrote:Can someone explain this part of the 11p discussion:

THE TRACK GUIDANCE IS IN TWO DISTINCT BRANCHES...THE GFS...NOGAPS...AND UKMET SHOW THE TURN OCCURRING OVER THE BAHAMAS....WHILE THE HWRF...GFDL...AND ECMWF TAKE IKE OVER CUBA OR THE STRAITS OF FLORIDA.

Does that mean it will either go south of Florida or East of Florida, but they're sure it won't hit Florida? :?: :?:

~Beth~


Beth what it really means that as of right now anywhere within the cone is possible. There is quite a spread between the models and as is usually the case they are having to take the middle road.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1895 Postby Sanibel » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:55 pm

As I posted before, GFDL, this year, has a history of nailing the SW dips. Fay did a SW dip over Puerto Rico to Hispaniola. GFDL had a crazy SW dip outlier on Jamaica for Gus and it verified. Since this storm is also coming in on the 2008 rising track followed by SW dip I would not ignore GFDL's accuracy so far on this type of track.

If you are confused over the conflict between GFDL tracking along Cuba and the other models doing a sharp recurve in front of Florida it could be simply resolved by saying GFDL thinks it will miss the weakness and the others don't. In this 2008 triple crown so far this year GFDL has the Kentucky Derby and Preakness won. For the Belmont it is also running the same type of race, so far, before the final stretch.

Problem is the Gus dip stayed slightly north of GFDL's first call.
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#1896 Postby artist » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:56 pm

Air Force Met - did you possibly miss my question regarding Hanna moving out north faster than she was supposed to?
Or any one with the knowledge, how will this affect Ike's track?
Last edited by artist on Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10155
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion

#1897 Postby Blown Away » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:56 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Blown_away wrote:I'm having a dilemma tonight. There are two theories that use heavily to determine if SFL is going to have a hurricane. I love the "Lushine Dry SFL May Theory" and the "Paul Hebert Box Theory". Obviously Ike is going to blow the Hebert Box by about 4 degrees to the north, but I also feel this could give even more credit to the Lushine Dry SFL May Theory if Ike comes to SFL. So is the Hebert Box theory a bust with Ike or does Lushine get more credit to his Dry SFL May theory.
Hebert Box Info: http://www.hurricanecity.com/hebertbox.htm
Jim Lushine Thread: viewtopic.php?f=31&t=101251

You have stated that the dry May theory is flawed, but you suddenly "love" it... heh. I'm not dismissive, but it's a little humorous... I don't believe you can utilize it to point toward a Florida strike, in my personal view.

Hopefully, no one earns the impression that I'm -removed- for a Florida landfall... I'm merely adding some considerations to the debate.


I've always loved the Lushine theory, wow all the posts and research I did you can't tell how excited I was watching the SFWMD SFL May rain tallies day to day. I started that thread and understand that conclusions can't be made about the theory if Ike does or does not come to SFL. If Ike comes to SFL, hopefully not as a monster, Lushine will tip the glass to his theory. It seems there is a building anxiety that Ike will make it to SFL, but I have a hard time dismissing Paul's Hebert Box theory, that's why I'm still leaning against no landfall in SFL based on Paul's theory alone. I don't think I am -removed- at all, I've established a long track record discussing those theories.
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#1898 Postby shah8 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:59 pm

I think the size of the dip is dependent on whether or when the shear disrupts Ike. The more disruption, the closer to verification. The less, then it will be pretty gentle SW, NW.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#1899 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:00 pm

Well, Ike looks good, but I think it was wise to maintain Ike at 115kt. Shear is definitely making an attempt to weaken the storm now. The nw side has flattened off dramatically over the last hour or so. However, with such a well formed storm that has already been dealing with 20-25kt shear since this morning, I dont expect this to weaken below 120mph during the next 2 days. And once shear backs off in 48 hours, I think its pretty obvious that unless the core of the storm is significantly disrupted by the shear, this will be a lot stronger than 110kt in 5 days...
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#1900 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:02 pm

gatorcane wrote:5day forecast point landfall in Miami

But its prudent to focus on the cone and not the line this far out.



The NHC 5 days out track record is much better then what it was 5 years ago so I would
definitely be concerned if I lived anywhere in South Florida just ask the
folks in Central LA.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests